Page 28 of 64 FirstFirst ... 18262728293038 ... LastLast
Results 271 to 280 of 631

Thread: Justices extend gun owner rights nationwide

  1. #271
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    virginia
    Last Seen
    04-01-13 @ 03:46 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    16,881
    Blog Entries
    19

    Re: Justices extend gun owner rights nationwide

    Quote Originally Posted by Tucker Case View Post
    It was intended to be a limitation on the Federal Government's authority to infringe upon certain rights.
    Yeah, that what I said.

  2. #272
    Matthew 16:3

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Everywhere and nowhere
    Last Seen
    06-24-17 @ 05:05 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Progressive
    Posts
    45,603

    Re: Justices extend gun owner rights nationwide

    Quote Originally Posted by LiberalAvenger View Post
    Yeah, that what I said.
    No, that's not what you said.
    Tucker Case - Tard magnet.

  3. #273
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    virginia
    Last Seen
    04-01-13 @ 03:46 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    16,881
    Blog Entries
    19

    Re: Justices extend gun owner rights nationwide

    Quote Originally Posted by Tucker Case View Post
    No, that's not what you said.
    Is two.

  4. #274
    Matthew 16:3

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Everywhere and nowhere
    Last Seen
    06-24-17 @ 05:05 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Progressive
    Posts
    45,603

    Re: Justices extend gun owner rights nationwide

    Quote Originally Posted by LiberalAvenger View Post
    Is two.
    No, you said "protect".

    In order for the Bill of Rights to have been intended to protect certain rights, it would have had to grant authority to the Federal Government, not restrict authority form the federal government. In the preamble to the Bill of Rights, it clearly states that the bill of rights was restricting federal authority.
    Last edited by Tucker Case; 06-30-10 at 01:19 PM.
    Tucker Case - Tard magnet.

  5. #275
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    virginia
    Last Seen
    04-01-13 @ 03:46 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    16,881
    Blog Entries
    19

    Re: Justices extend gun owner rights nationwide

    Quote Originally Posted by Tucker Case View Post
    No, you said "protect".

    In order for the Bill of Rights to have been intended to protect certain rights, it would have had to grant authority to the Federal Government, not restrict authority form the federal government. In the preamble to the Bill of Rights, it clearly states that the bill of rights was restricting federal authority.
    **** the federal government. We the people are the government.

  6. #276
    Wrinkly member
    Manc Skipper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Southern England
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:00 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Liberal
    Posts
    23,208

    Re: Justices extend gun owner rights nationwide

    Those activist judges are the pits, aren't they!
    Don't work out, work in.

    Never eat anything that's served in a bucket.

  7. #277
    Banned Goobieman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Last Seen
    03-22-15 @ 02:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    17,343

    Re: Justices extend gun owner rights nationwide

    Quote Originally Posted by Guy Incognito View Post
    He makes no mention of the right extending to self defense or hunting/sport. What do you make of it?
    Oh, sorry - you need to show that the intent was to protect the collective right to self-defense to the specific exclusion of the individual right. Simply posting a quote that doesnt mention the individual right to self-defense doesnt cut it.
    Try again.

  8. #278
    Banned Goobieman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Last Seen
    03-22-15 @ 02:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    17,343

    Re: Justices extend gun owner rights nationwide

    Quote Originally Posted by CaptainCourtesy View Post
    I said nothing about owning a car. I said driving. In order to drive, legally, in Ohio, what are the rules, Goobie?
    As noted:
    -You only need a license to drive on public property
    -You only need to register a car if you will drve it on public property.
    And so, to treat guns like cars, there would be no licensing or registration requirements for guns that are not used on public property.

  9. #279
    Banned Goobieman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Last Seen
    03-22-15 @ 02:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    17,343

    Re: Justices extend gun owner rights nationwide

    Quote Originally Posted by Tucker Case View Post
    No, you said "protect".

    In order for the Bill of Rights to have been intended to protect certain rights, it would have had to grant authority to the Federal Government, not restrict authority form the federal government. In the preamble to the Bill of Rights, it clearly states that the bill of right
    s was restricting federal authority.
    Yes... but by forbidding the federal government to act against those rgihts, it protects those rights from the federal government.
    ???

  10. #280
    Matthew 16:3

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Everywhere and nowhere
    Last Seen
    06-24-17 @ 05:05 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Progressive
    Posts
    45,603

    Re: Justices extend gun owner rights nationwide

    Quote Originally Posted by Goobieman View Post
    Yes... but by forbidding the federal government to act against those rgihts, it protects those rights from the federal government.
    ???
    The key is adding the "From the federal government". Your wording is accurate, his wasn't.

    I can say the intention of a condom is to protect a person, but I'd be being inaccurate if I didn't say "From sexually transmitted diseases".

    If someone wasn't aware of the unstated prepositional phrase, they might put on a condom before running into a fire. Then they'll end up dead with a condom melted to their giblets. They were offered no protection by said condom.

    The Bill of Rights isn't an unlimited protection of those rights. Just like a condom isn't an unlimited protection of a person's well-being.
    Tucker Case - Tard magnet.

Page 28 of 64 FirstFirst ... 18262728293038 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •