looked for an answer
what i did find was this:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/assets...paygo_bill.pdf(b) PAYGO Ledger.—OMB shall maintain and make publicly available a document containing a PAYGO ledger and, not later than 7 days (excluding weekends and legal holidays) after the enactment of any PAYGO legislation, OMB shall record on that ledger its estimate of the legislation's budgetary effects in each fiscal year, applying the look-back requirement of subsection (e) and the averaging requirement of subsection (h). The document shall also explain any major differences between the OMB and CBO estimates of the budgetary effects of PAYGO legislation.
what i was unable to locate (within the OMB.gov site) was the required PAYGO Ledger to be maintained for public view by the OMB
if anyone is able to find that PAYGO ledger, please post its location
while i was looking i stumbled across this paygo statement by my favorite (living) politician:Spratt Statement on Senate Passage of Statutory PAYGO Legislation | Congressman John Spratt, Representing the 5th District of South Carolina“I’m pleased to see the Senate join the House and make “pay-as-you-go” black-letter law.
“At the outset of the 1990s, Congress passed the Budget Enforcement Act to ensure that the Budget Summit Agreement was carried out. Among its provisions was a new rule called ‘pay-as-you-go’ or PAYGO for short. Critics disdained our resort to budget process. They accused us of dodging the hard choices we had to make if we were going to wipe out the deficit. But by the end of the 1990s, the budget was in surplus for the first time in 30 years; and it was clear that budget process rules like PAYGO played a big part in our success.
“Republicans were in the majority in 2002 when the Budget Enforcement Act expired, and they chose not to reinstate PAYGO, knowing that it would impede passage of their tax cutting agenda. Without the process rules, the budget plunged from a surplus of $236 billion in the year 2000 to a deficit of $413 billion in the year 2004.
“When Democrats took back the House, the reinstatement of PAYGO was at the top of our agenda. We made PAYGO a rule of the House the first day we convened the 110th Congress.
“The Obama Administration and the current Congress have inherited a colossal deficit, swollen to accommodate needed recovery measures. As these measures pull us out of recession, we must turn our attention on our longer-term fiscal fate.
“Statutory PAYGO works because it reins in new entitlement spending and new tax cuts. Both tend to be long lasting – easy to pass, hard to repeal. By insisting on offsets and deficit neutrality, PAYGO buffers the bottom-line. Its terms are complex, but at its core is a common-sense rule that everyone can understand: when you are in a hole, stop digging.
“Statutory PAYGO will put more rigor into the budget process, and help us reduce the deficit, both short and long-term.”
i will contact Spratt's office to see if his constituency support staff can help locate that PAYGO ledger
Came across this article moments ago concering the G-20 Summit. I don't know how many times it's been stated, but our economic problems aren't just "our problem". The entire industrialized world is affected.
As such, the U.S. isn't the only country that has authorized stimulus programs. I mention this because everyone who still opposes the idea really need to open their eyes and realize that the ARRA was something that needed to be done whether we liked the idea or not.Obama spoke after G-20 leaders issued a statement calling for "advanced" nations to cut their budget deficits — as a proportion of gross domestic product growth — in half by 2013, and to put their annual deficits on either a lower or more stable basis by 2016.
We'll start hearing the W.H./Pres. Obama put more emphasis on job creation in the coming days. So, for those who say, "It's about damned time," you can relax soon.
How about not using the phrase "deficit reduction" and use a phrase that describes what has to be done. That phrase is "spending cuts". A corollary phrase is "constitutional limits on government".
Impose those two magic phrases on the US government and the deficit will vanish and we'll be needing tax cuts. And all the out of work government bureaucrats can replace Mexicans in the hotels and strawberry fields and finally start doing something useful with their lives.
For those who are interested, the G-20's Summit Declaration can be found at: http://www.g20.org/Documents/g20_declaration_en.pdf
Point #10 is the one that has been the focus of public and media attention.
One should note that it does not repudiate the fiscal stimulus packages that were deployed during the severe recession. Indeed, if one recalls, the G-20 championed the use of fiscal stimulus measures during the economic crisis. It also offers cautious language regarding implementation of fiscal consolidation. The bottom line is that the U.S. has not committed itself to aggressive fiscal consolidation. Instead, much of the deficit reduction that is likely to occur over the next 3 years will be driven by a decline in cyclical deficits on account of economic growth and expiration of fiscal stimulus measures. Steps aimed at alleviating the nation's structural deficits (mandatory spending/health care reform and significant tax code changes) are not very likely. Some tinkering is possible on the revenue side as tax relief provisions are slated to expire next year, but most will likely be renewed. Recent overwhelming legislative waiver of Medicare's modest cost-saving provision (the so-called "doctor's fix") suggests that bipartisan opposition to mandatory spending reforms remains very strong.10. We are committed to taking concerted actions to sustain the recovery, create jobs and to achieve stronger, more sustainable and more balanced growth. These will be differentiated and tailored to national circumstances. We agreed today on:
· Following through on fiscal stimulus and communicating “growth friendly” fiscal consolidation plans in advanced countries that will be implemented going forward. Sound fiscal finances are essential to sustain recovery, provide flexibility to respond to new shocks, ensure the capacity to meet the challenges of aging populations, and avoid leaving future generations with a legacy of deficits and debt. The path of adjustment must be carefully calibrated to sustain the recovery in private demand. There is a risk that synchronized fiscal adjustment across several major economies could adversely impact the recovery. There is also a risk that the failure to implement consolidation where necessary would undermine confidence and hamper growth. Reflecting this balance, advanced economies have committed to fiscal plans that will at least halve deficits by 2013 and stabilize or reduce government debt-to-GDP ratios by 2016. Recognizing the circumstances of Japan, we welcome the Japanese government’s fiscal consolidation plan announced recently with their growth strategy. Those with serious fiscal challenges need to accelerate the pace of consolidation. Fiscal consolidation plans will be credible, clearly communicated, differentiated to national circumstances, and focused on measures to foster economic growth...