Anything which infringes upon my right of self ownership and violates the non-aggression principle, yes. The legitimate roll of the government (assuming that there is one) is to defend those rights not to infringe upon them., because you seem to oppose the governmental ability to actually do anything.
Through theft. I never agreed for the state to confiscate my capital and transfer it to state corporatists to produce weapons. You don't need the state to provide for defense, private security and defense agencies could provide those services and it could be provided cheaper through dominant assurance contracts entered into voluntarily with their consumers rather than through a giant racketeering scheme.Those soldiers, tanks, planes, rockets, and satellites that protect you, how exactly do you think they get paid for?