Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Justices Limit Use of ‘Honest Services’ Law Against Fraud

  1. #1
    Girthless
    RightinNYC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    New York, NY
    Last Seen
    01-23-11 @ 11:56 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Conservative
    Posts
    25,894

    Justices Limit Use of ‘Honest Services’ Law Against Fraud

    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/25/us...gewanted=print

    Ruling for two prominent corporate executives in prison for fraud, the Supreme Court on Thursday dramatically narrowed the scope of a law often used by federal prosecutors in corruption cases. The justices were unanimous in calling at least the broadest interpretation of the law, which makes it a crime “to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services,” unconstitutionally vague. The decisions call into question the convictions of Jeffrey K. Skilling, a former chief executive of Enron, the Houston energy company, and Conrad M. Black, the newspaper executive convicted of defrauding his media company, Hollinger International.

    The decisions may also have implications for many other cases, including those of former Gov. Rod R. Blagojevich of Illinois, whose trial for violating the law is underway in Chicago, and Joseph L. Bruno, once one of the most prominent politicians in New York who was convicted of federal corruption charges in December. The law has been the subject of frequent criticism in the lower courts for giving potential defendants too little guidance and prosecutors too much discretion. “How can the public be expected to know what the statute means when the judges and prosecutors themselves do not know, or must make it up as they go along?” Judge Dennis Jacobs of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in New York, asked in a 2003 dissent.

    Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, in writing the majority decision in both the Skilling and Black cases on Thursday, said the law must be limited to the core offenses of bribes and kickbacks. Mr. Skilling’s conduct, she said from the bench, “entailed no bribe or kickback.”
    This is great news. The "honest services fraud" law is absurdly vague, allowing prosecutors to turn almost anything into a crime, even where no real crime has been committed. As the law stood, you could be convicted under the honest services law for things that would be considered merely unethical, regardless of whether or not you actually got anything out of it.

    I'm surprised that only 3 would have overturned it altogether, but it's good that the court was unanimous in its main opinion.


    For links to the opinions: SCOTUSblog » Today’s opinions
    People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.

  2. #2
    Outer space potato man

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:29 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    51,849

    Re: Justices Limit Use of ‘Honest Services’ Law Against Fraud

    On the other hand, Skilling should be shot. :P
    He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear
    Quote Originally Posted by Lutherf View Post
    We’ll say what? Something like “nothing happened” ... Yeah, we might say something like that.

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    virginia
    Last Seen
    04-01-13 @ 03:46 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    16,881
    Blog Entries
    19

    Re: Justices Limit Use of ‘Honest Services’ Law Against Fraud

    This is great news. Maybe Bernie Maddox will be released from prison, now.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •