• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Al Gore Accused of "Unwanted Sexual Contact" in 2006, Authorities Say

Middleground said:
Wow, Rev... for Al's sake, I hope you are not judge and/or jury (if it ever comes to that).
Click to expand...





I haven't convicted him yet, consider me though, in line with the prosecutions contention for now....


All to often the canary in the cage is the egress of the wife. ;)
 
Reverend_Hellh0und said:
I haven't convicted him yet, consider me though, in line with the prosecutions contention for now....


All to often the canary in the cage is the egress of the wife. ;)
Click to expand...


I was really hoping for the Goracle to be placed in a cell over his huge scam to the tune of Trillions world wide rather than some sex scandal, but I'll take it. If for nothing else than to stop the damage he is doing to the world.


j-mac
 
Reverend_Hellh0und said:
I haven't convicted him yet, consider me though, in line with the prosecutions contention for now....


All to often the canary in the cage is the egress of the wife. ;)
Click to expand...

Thing is, Rev, there is a difference between cheating and commiting a crime. Two different reason why a spouse would leave, so I wouldn't jump the gun if I were you.
 
Middleground said:
Thing is, Rev, there is a difference between cheating and commiting a crime. Two different reason why a spouse would leave, so I wouldn't jump the gun if I were you.
Click to expand...

Not always. Sometimes cheating involves a crime. John Edwards is learning that.
 
Gill said:
Not always. Sometimes cheating involves a crime. John Edwards is learning that.
Click to expand...

In Gore's case, he's being accused of sexual assault. How does that involve donation money again?
 
Middleground said:
In Gore's case, he's being accused of sexual assault. How does that involve donation money again?
Click to expand...

Where did I make that claim ???? :roll:

Edwards is accused of abusing campaign contributions, Gore is accused of sexual assault........both crimes.
 
Gill said:
Where did I make that claim ???? :roll:

Edwards is accused of abusing campaign contributions, Gore is accused of sexual assault........both crimes.
Click to expand...

You said that John Edwards was learning that sometimes cheating involves a crime.
 
Reverend_Hellh0und said:
I haven't convicted him yet, consider me though, in line with the prosecutions contention for now....


All to often the canary in the cage is the egress of the wife. ;)
Click to expand...

It need not be because of a crime for the wife to want a divorce, ya know.
 
rivrrat said:
It need not be because of a crime for the wife to want a divorce, ya know.
Click to expand...




I don't know, who would want to divorce this? :pimpdaddy:




watchingu.gif
 
Last edited:
rivrrat said:
You said that John Edwards was learning that sometimes cheating involves a crime.
Click to expand...

Did I make the claim that Gore misused campaign money ????

Answer: NO
 
Gill said:
Did I make the claim that Gore misused campaign money ????

Answer: NO
Click to expand...

That's not what she said. She asked what campaign money had to do with sexual assault. You're the one who made the comparison between the two.
 
rivrrat said:
That's not what she said. She asked what campaign money had to do with sexual assault. You're the one who made the comparison between the two.
Click to expand...

NO, I did not. I said cheating sometimes involves a crime. Sexual assault in Gore's case, campaign money abuse in Edward's case.

Try reading a bit closer instead of jumping in and muddying the water.
 
RightinNYC said:
Al Gore Accused of "Unwanted Sexual Contact" in 2006, Authorities Say



Eeesh. The whole story seems a bit strange - her lawyer went to the police in 2006 to complain of a sexual assault, but never did anything about it. Then she herself talked to the police in 2009, but the police never went forward with it. Now in 2010, she's...doing what exactly? It's not clear what precipitated this story.

Either way, the National Enquirer once again breaks a story. Pretty damn impressive.
Click to expand...


I do not mean to sound like I am sticking up a for a eviro-loon wacko religious nut but I heard that his accuser tried selling the story to the National Enquirer. If this is true then how can this woman's word be trusted?(just in case no one else brought this up)Seems to me that she is just trying to scam people for money and fame.
 
jamesrage said:
I do not mean to sound like I am sticking up a for a eviro-loon wacko religious nut but I heard that his accuser tried selling the story to the National Enquirer. If this is true then how can this woman's word be trusted?(just in case no one else brought this up)Seems to me that she is just trying to scam people for money and fame.
Click to expand...



Or she's making the best of a bad experience. :shrug:
 
Reverend_Hellh0und said:
Or she's making the best of a bad experience. :shrug:
Click to expand...

I say con artist trying to make a buck or get fame. If she really was sexually assulted or got unwanted sexual contract I would think that she would have been telling her story to everyone if the police didn't do anything about it.IF ABC,CBS,NBC,PBS,FOX,CNN, or any of their other affiliates didn't listen then seeing how she went to the National Enquirer she could have went to every loony site that jumped onto the Obama is not a natural born citizen tabloid news site with her story. I find it hard to trust people trying to seek monetary gain instead of seeking justice over what some might view as a horrible event.
 
jamesrage said:
I say con artist trying to make a buck or get fame. If she really was sexually assulted or got unwanted sexual contract I would think that she would have been telling her story to everyone if the police didn't do anything about it.IF ABC,CBS,NBC,PBS,FOX,CNN, or any of their other affiliates didn't listen then seeing how she went to the National Enquirer she could have went to every loony site that jumped onto the Obama is not a natural born citizen tabloid news site with her story. I find it hard to trust people trying to seek monetary gain instead of seeking justice over what some might view as a horrible event.
Click to expand...

Maybe she can get a Penthouse gig like Paula Jones did.
 
jamesrage said:
I say con artist trying to make a buck or get fame. If she really was sexually assulted or got unwanted sexual contract I would think that she would have been telling her story to everyone if the police didn't do anything about it.IF ABC,CBS,NBC,PBS,FOX,CNN, or any of their other affiliates didn't listen then seeing how she went to the National Enquirer she could have went to every loony site that jumped onto the Obama is not a natural born citizen tabloid news site with her story. I find it hard to trust people trying to seek monetary gain instead of seeking justice over what some might view as a horrible event.
Click to expand...




I think she did, then the paper quashed it, no? The same one that quashed stories for another democrat no? ;)
 
Reverend_Hellh0und said:
I think she did, then the paper quashed it, no? The same one that quashed stories for another democrat no? ;)
Click to expand...
Those are not the only media sources she could have went to. I find it hard to believe that the same woman who would go to the national Enquirer would not go to world net daily or some other site with a ax to grind against democrats regardless of how absurd the story may sound.
 
jamesrage said:
Those are not the only media sources she could have went to. I find it hard to believe that the same woman who would go to the national Enquirer would not go to world net daily or some other site with a ax to grind against democrats regardless of how absurd the story may sound.
Click to expand...




Dunno, we'll see. That said though its an odd way to "make money"/
 
Gill said:
NO, I did not. I said cheating sometimes involves a crime. Sexual assault in Gore's case, campaign money abuse in Edward's case.

Try reading a bit closer instead of jumping in and muddying the water.
Click to expand...

No, you said cheating sometimes involves a crime, something that John Edwards was learning. As if his campaign money had some relevance to cheating. If John Edwards had been convicted of sexual assault, your statement would have made sense. As it is, it made no sense at all.
 
Reverend_Hellh0und said:
I think she did, then the paper quashed it, no? The same one that quashed stories for another democrat no? ;)
Click to expand...

Al Gore gets treated by a massage therapist everywhere he travels. A local newspaper in the area where this "incident" happened, got wind of this, and tried for a year to find others (all over the US) who have been victimized by Al. Nothing but crickets, so they gave up. According to this conservative newspaper, it's an non-story.

I find this bit of information interesting, don't you?
 
Middleground said:
Al Gore gets treated by a massage therapist everywhere he travels. A local newspaper in the area where this "incident" happened, got wind of this, and tried for a year to find others (all over the US) who have been victimized by Al. Nothing but crickets, so they gave up. According to this conservative newspaper, it's an non-story.

I find this bit of information interesting, don't you?
Click to expand...



what your anecdote and unverified evidence?


I think calling for a "massage" at 11pm is kinda shady. :shrug:
 
Reverend_Hellh0und said:
what your anecdote and unverified evidence?


I think calling for a "massage" at 11pm is kinda shady. :shrug:
Click to expand...

It is a tad shady but then again many people don't keep normal hours. I know that I personally do a lot of things late at night when most people are asleep, and if I had the money I would probably call in a masseuse at some strange hour of the night, because that's when I'm awake and doing things.
 
Frozengale said:
It is a tad shady but then again many people don't keep normal hours. I know that I personally do a lot of things late at night when most people are asleep, and if I had the money I would probably call in a masseuse at some strange hour of the night, because that's when I'm awake and doing things.
Click to expand...



Just make sure you negotiate up front. :ssst:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom