- Joined
- Jul 21, 2005
- Messages
- 51,710
- Reaction score
- 35,488
- Location
- Washington, DC
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
This amazes me...
We can't round up all the illegal aliens in the country but we can give housing to every homeless person.
We can't afford to secure the border but we can afford to provide living space for every person without it.
We couldn't afford Iraq or Afghanistan, but we can pass Trillion dollar stimulus programs, trillion dollar entitlement programs, and provide housing to millions and millions of people for free.
There's a disconnect here I'm somehow missing. The argument always seems to be "we don't have the money" yet we always seem to have the money when its something the other side wants to do. Which leads me to believe perhaps its less about the money and more about them disagreeing with the very notions.
We can't round up all the illegal aliens in the country but we can give housing to every homeless person.
We can't afford to secure the border but we can afford to provide living space for every person without it.
We couldn't afford Iraq or Afghanistan, but we can pass Trillion dollar stimulus programs, trillion dollar entitlement programs, and provide housing to millions and millions of people for free.
There's a disconnect here I'm somehow missing. The argument always seems to be "we don't have the money" yet we always seem to have the money when its something the other side wants to do. Which leads me to believe perhaps its less about the money and more about them disagreeing with the very notions.