Last edited by PubliusInfinitu; 07-04-10 at 06:10 PM.
Maybe Clinton didn't completely balance the budget, but see that leveling out of the debt at the end of his administration, it's noticeable. This graph seems to indicate a near balanced budget under his administration.
You clowns are an absolute laugh fest. Is there a point hidden amongst that inane drivel?
Are you trying to complain about the doubling of the US debt under Bush, while celebrating the further projection of Clinton leveling off the US Debt... hoping to project Bush as a Conservative and a spend-thrift, Clinton as a Liberal and fiscally responsible?
Please clear this up for us before we proceed... and yes... no matter which way ya go, it's gonna hurt.
Last edited by PubliusInfinitu; 07-04-10 at 07:13 PM.
What I'm saying is that during the Clinton administration spending went down, while during the Bush administration spending shot up, according to this graph. They deserve blanket credit/responsibility for what happened during their administration.
Please, go for it buddy.
Last edited by Harry Guerrilla; 07-04-10 at 09:01 PM.
I was discovering that life just simply isn't fair and bask in the unsung glory of knowing that each obstacle overcome along the way only adds to the satisfaction in the end. Nothing great, after all, was ever accomplished by anyone sulking in his or her misery.