Pedophlilia by true definition is sex with prepubescent kids - and has never been considered normal. That's the worst analogy ever.
You can play me again and I'll go easier on you next time just to give you a chance, don't worry.Game, set and match.
And your opinion is just that, an opinion. Evolution has nothing to do with your argument as this isn't an argument about procreation or the passing on of genetic material. It is an argument about how the law should equally apply to everyone.Two, don't attempt to define my world. Your opinion is just that, an opinion. On my side, several hundred million years of evolution. I can be tolerant, but I don't need sexual perversity shoved down my throat.
As far as what's being shoved down your throat...well, you wandered into a thread about something you claim to find perverse, you willingly participate in said thread where the topic is about something you claim to find perverse, and then you bitch and moan that it's being forced on you when we all know there's this little X in the top corner of the window that you can hit at any time to make it all go away and no one in this thread would care to stop you from doing so...
So yeah, forgive me if I point and laugh at your double entendre about something being shoved down your throat. It's laughable when you people pull that.
Pedophilia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You really don't want to go there with me. And besides, I'm off to work.The word comes from the Greek: παιδοφιλία (paidophilia): παῖς (pais), "child" and φιλία (philia), "friendship". Paidophilia was coined by Greek poets either as a substitute for "paiderastia" (pederasty), or vice versa.
The founders instituted democratic elections with state's rights. California voted on gay marriage and it was shot down. If there is anything illegal in the bill they should have dealt with it before the election. It was nothing but a shot at legalizing it through the voters, and when that didn't work they had to take plan B and legislate from the bench.We're a democratic republic, not a democracy - the way our Founders wanted it.
It affects everyone living in the state of California. This does affect the voters because it essentially means that their votes and opinions mean absolutely nothing. The voted to prevent gay marriage, reversing this absolutely affects the voters and strips them of their right to vote on this issue.That's a right they shouldn't have had, since this does not affect the people as a whole. Therefore I'm all for the Supreme court overturning it. I don't believe in referendum unless the law directly affects the voters.
And how dare the secular/socially liberal world impose their morals upon us and say "deal with it." Who is imposing morals upon others in this case? Through a democratic process California voted on gay marriage, the majority voted to prevent it. Reversing this decision is imposing secular morals upon an entire state of people who democratically voted to prevent gay marriage. This is a prime example of imposing morals upon others and ignoring the democratic process.How dare the religious morons vote against something just because they don't like it.
If this is overturned it's a disgrace to this country and a defeat of individual liberty. It's a disgrace to the country because it means democracy was defeating and an imposing group has legislated their morals from the bench. It's a defeat of individual liberty because it means individuals have no voting rights when it comes to social issues. It means that even though individuals voted and the majority voted in favor of preventing gay marriage, that their votes don't matter. It strips an individual of their voting rights and essentially says "your opinion doesn't matter because it's not what we want."If it's not overturned, it's a discrace to this country and a defeat of individual liberty. Go ahead and overturn it, and show these Christo-fascist who impose fascim descretely by legal means that the American people have had enough of there elitist, unpatriotic bullcrap.
Tired of elections being between the lesser of two evils.When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser. -Socrates
I am not attempting to define your anything. I am simply pointing out that what you call it is irrelevant to the big picture, which is the law. You show a lack of understanding of evolution, as homosexuality can be accounted for by evolution.