Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 41 to 44 of 44

Thread: San Francisco set to pass cell phone radiation law

  1. #41
    User
    Chappy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    San Francisco
    Last Seen
    04-07-15 @ 01:50 AM
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    2,443
    Blog Entries
    26

    Re: San Francisco set to pass cell phone radiation law

    Quote Originally Posted by RightinNYC View Post
    You're confusing two things …
    We can always count on you to distort and misrepresent the meanings of other members posts.

    When the Board requires cell phone companies post emission levels along side the phones that are offered for sale that what's they mean.


    Quote Originally Posted by RightinNYC View Post
    Ah, harping on the distinction between a warning label on the phone and a warning label posted next to the phone. Cute.

    Moreover, you once again ignore the point - do you actually think this is going to have a real impact on consumer choices? Is the information posted next to phones going to impact your cell phone usage? Do you think people are going to see these signs and decide to go back to land lines?

    It's frivolous ****, on par with the vaccine-autism garbage.
    Bull****. You just refuse to get it. It's not about not using cell phones, it's about buying the right cell phone. They're not all created equal. Consumers have the right to know.
    Last edited by Chappy; 06-17-10 at 11:26 PM.
    “Real environmentalists live in cities, and they visit what's left of the wilderness as gently and respectfully as possible.” — Donna Moulton, letter to the editor, Tucson Weekly, published on August 23, 2001

  2. #42
    Outer space potato man

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:19 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    51,709

    Re: San Francisco set to pass cell phone radiation law

    Quote Originally Posted by Orion View Post
    Seeing as how the trains in my city operate on electro magnetism, I'm assuming it was electromagnetic energy.



    I determined it through simple deduction.

    I'm not sure what your attachment is to disproving my claim which, to me, is self-evident based on my experience. Maybe you feel that the ways in which you understand the world are being threatened or something, I don't really know. I can assure you, it wasn't accoustics. I'm a pretty sound sleeper. People who live near power lines can experience similar effects, if they are sensitive to it. Not everyone is though, so I can't make any sort of universal generalization.

    I can only speak on behalf of myself.
    ... it's a debate forum. Arguing is what we do here

    Edit: Plus I'm a science geek and people posting things that are in direct contradiction of the laws of physics makes me giggle.

    Edit 2: And what sort of train are you talking about?
    Last edited by Deuce; 06-18-10 at 12:30 AM.
    He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear
    Quote Originally Posted by Lutherf View Post
    We’ll say what? Something like “nothing happened” ... Yeah, we might say something like that.

  3. #43
    Sage
    mike2810's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    arizona
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:59 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    14,981

    Re: San Francisco set to pass cell phone radiation law

    Quote Originally Posted by Chappy View Post
    Bull****. You just refuse to get it. It's not about not using cell phones, it's about buying the right cell phone. They're not all created equal. Consumers have the right to know.
    and the information is available for those who seek it. It was there for the reading before SF did anything.
    "I can explain it to you but, I can't understand it for you"

  4. #44
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Last Seen
    12-26-10 @ 06:57 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    8,083

    Re: San Francisco set to pass cell phone radiation law

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post
    Edit: Plus I'm a science geek and people posting things that are in direct contradiction of the laws of physics makes me giggle.
    Yeah, because science knows everything and there are no phenomena that we don't know about. Typical arrogance.

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post
    Edit 2: And what sort of train are you talking about?
    I don't feel like debating this with you anymore. This whole tangent is based on a side comment I made.

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •