Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: White House works to ease Iran proposal in Congress

  1. #1
    Guru

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Last Seen
    05-13-11 @ 09:01 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    4,075
    Blog Entries
    3

    White House works to ease Iran proposal in Congress

    Link
    White House works to ease Iran proposal in Congress - latimes.com

    Quote(Reporting from Washington
    The Obama administration, which labored for months to impose tough new United Nations sanctions against Iran, now is pushing in the opposite direction against Congress as it crafts U.S. sanctions that the White House fears may go too far.

    Administration officials have begun negotiations with congressional leaders, who are working on versions of House and Senate bills that would punish companies that sell refined petroleum products to Iran or help the country's oil industry.

    Unlike the U.N. measures, congressional action would pertain only to U.S. policies and agencies and would not be binding on other countries. Other countries and groups of nations also are considering adopting measures to augment the U.N. action.)

    Good God, after all that the US has done in persuading other Countries to agree with the exceptionally weak sanctions that they have been able to get a majority agreement for in the UN,
    Obama is now trying to weaken those sanctions still further.
    JUST WHAT IS GOING ON?
    If Obama was fearful of damaging relations with other countries that have Company's that deal with Iran, does he not realize that country's such as EU nations as well as Russia and China knew exactly what the ramifications of signing up and agreeing to the latest round of sanctions would be for them and their own Company's.

  2. #2
    User Deputy Fife's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Last Seen
    06-17-10 @ 01:03 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    9

    Re: White House works to ease Iran proposal in Congress

    Obama is certainly concerned about foreign relations, but he does not realize that conveying weakness does not earn you any respect on the world stage.

    The carrot is offered as a means of promoting diplomacy, but the carrot is useless without the stick to serve as a severe consequence if nations are unwilling to cooperate.

    Can it be argued that the US is a bully? That the US has a cultural and economic empire? Yes, but since that perception is unlikely to change in the Europeans' minds, I say we embrace our role as world leaders.

    The US should worry about garnering the respect, rather than the friendship of foreign nations. If fear and envy factors into that respect, so be it.

    When we change this whole popularity contest outlook on foreign policy to one that zealously asserts American exceptionalism, we will gain respect and avoid false sentiments of "friendship" among nations.

    Iran needs to know that we're serious, and Obama needs to communicate that.

  3. #3
    Guru

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Last Seen
    05-13-11 @ 09:01 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    4,075
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: White House works to ease Iran proposal in Congress

    Do you in all honesty think Obama is capable of that?

  4. #4
    Sage
    Khayembii Communique's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 07:15 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    7,881

    Re: White House works to ease Iran proposal in Congress

    Quote Originally Posted by Deputy Fife
    Obama is certainly concerned about foreign relations, but he does not realize that conveying weakness does not earn you any respect on the world stage.
    You have to put this in the context of recent events. I don't know how closely you follow Iranian politics, but the flotilla massacre and detainments were a huge propaganda victory for the hardliners in Iran who exploited them in their rhetoric to gain support. Iran has a lot of influence in the region, and has gained a lot of that due to US intervention in the region in the past decade, and so this poses a very big problem for the US government. While they do want to exert their influence on Iran in terms of its nuclear program, they don't want to push Iran so far to the right that the really conservative leaders gain the majority, as this would really increase the tensions in the region and increase the chances of destabilization enormously, which is exactly what the US doesn't want.

    It's a very sensitive situation, and if the US administration plays too strong of a hand they could see it slip through their fingers. The results could be disastrous.
    Last edited by Khayembii Communique; 06-11-10 at 09:46 PM.
    "I do not claim that every incident in the history of empire can be explained in directly economic terms. Economic interests are filtered through a political process, policies are implemented by a complex state apparatus, and the whole system generates its own momentum."

  5. #5
    Slayer of the DP Newsbot
    danarhea's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:30 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    39,725

    Re: White House works to ease Iran proposal in Congress

    Quote Originally Posted by Khayembii Communique View Post
    You have to put this in the context of recent events. I don't know how closely you follow Iranian politics, but the flotilla massacre and detainments were a huge propaganda victory for the hardliners in Iran who exploited them in their rhetoric to gain support. Iran has a lot of influence in the region, and has gained a lot of that due to US intervention in the region in the past decade, and so this poses a very big problem for the US government. While they do want to exert their influence on Iran in terms of its nuclear program, they don't want to push Iran so far to the right that the really conservative leaders gain the majority, as this would really increase the tensions in the region and increase the chances of destabilization enormously, which is exactly what the US doesn't want.

    It's a very sensitive situation, and if the US administration plays too strong of a hand they could see it slip through their fingers. The results could be disastrous.
    Actually, the US let the situation slip through their fingers in 1953, when they sent in the CIA to overturn a democratic election in Iran, and then installed the Shah.
    The ghost of Jack Kevorkian for President's Physician: 2016

  6. #6
    Educator
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Last Seen
    02-04-15 @ 11:02 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    808

    Re: White House works to ease Iran proposal in Congress

    Quote Originally Posted by Khayembii Communique View Post
    You have to put this in the context of recent events. I don't know how closely you follow Iranian politics, but the flotilla massacre and detainments were a huge propaganda victory for the hardliners in Iran who exploited them in their rhetoric to gain support. Iran has a lot of influence in the region, and has gained a lot of that due to US intervention in the region in the past decade, and so this poses a very big problem for the US government. While they do want to exert their influence on Iran in terms of its nuclear program, they don't want to push Iran so far to the right that the really conservative leaders gain the majority, as this would really increase the tensions in the region and increase the chances of destabilization enormously, which is exactly what the US doesn't want. It's a very sensitive situation, and if the US administration plays too strong of a hand they could see it slip through their fingers. The results could be disastrous.
    I will grant you that Iran has been spinning this event in their favor, I would argue that it is more so becaue of their worsening domestic situation that they have to make an even bigger deal about events like this. Ultimately, I do not think additional sanctions would push the youth, and those we saw revolting in the streets a few months ago, suddenly into the arms of the far right within Iran. If anything, I would argue that backing off of sanctions would weaken the reformers resolve, and firm up the power base of the present regime, which is not something I would shoot for.

    I think that your method is basically a maintence of the status quo, which already destabilizes the region, and does nothing to oust the current regime in favor of a more moderate replacement.

    Now to be clear, I am not calling for war, but reality is, this round of sanctions is mostly meaningless to begin with, and it just makes us look bad, and give Iran another PR victory when we back down from them, for really no gain.
    Last edited by NolaMan; 06-11-10 at 09:56 PM.

  7. #7
    Educator
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Last Seen
    02-04-15 @ 11:02 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    808

    Re: White House works to ease Iran proposal in Congress

    Quote Originally Posted by danarhea View Post
    Actually, the US let the situation slip through their fingers in 1953, when they sent in the CIA to overturn a democratic election in Iran, and then installed the Shah.
    Looking at it through the context of the Cold War and stability of the world's oil supply, that was not necessarily a bad move.

  8. #8
    Sage
    Khayembii Communique's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 07:15 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    7,881

    Re: White House works to ease Iran proposal in Congress

    Quote Originally Posted by Nolaman
    Ultimately, I do not think additional sanctions would push the youth, and those we saw revolting in the streets a few months ago, suddenly into the arms of the far right within Iran.
    There has already been a huge shift towards the hardliners because of these recent events so I'm not really sure what this means.

    If anything, I would argue that backing off of sanctions would weaken the reformers resolve, and firm up the power base of the present regime, which is not something I would shoot for.
    I very highly doubt there are many people in Iran that support sanctions.

    I think that your method is basically a maintence of the status quo, which already destabilizes the region, and does nothing to oust the current regime in favor of a more moderate replacement.
    What is "my method"???

    Now to be clear, I am not calling for war, but reality is, this round of sanctions is mostly meaningless to begin with, and it just makes us look bad, and give Iran another PR victory when we back down from them, for really no gain.
    You're very seriously underestimating the influence that the hardliners have and the volatility of the situation. A "hardline" approach against Iran will shift national opinion sharply to the right. There is absolutely no doubt about that.
    Last edited by Khayembii Communique; 06-11-10 at 10:01 PM. Reason: Typo
    "I do not claim that every incident in the history of empire can be explained in directly economic terms. Economic interests are filtered through a political process, policies are implemented by a complex state apparatus, and the whole system generates its own momentum."

  9. #9
    Educator
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Last Seen
    02-04-15 @ 11:02 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    808

    Re: White House works to ease Iran proposal in Congress

    Quote Originally Posted by Khayembii Communique View Post
    There has already been a huge shift towards the hardliners because of these recent events so I'm not really sure what this means.
    I don't think a "rally around the flag" moment constituents a real change however.

    I very highly doubt there are many people in Iran that support sanctions.
    I agree, my point is that there are those in the opposition party (for lack of a better term) that would probably see them as a way to eliminate the hardliners and change their overall policies to get them lifted.

    What is "my method"???
    Perhaps this was a poor choice of words. What I meant was what you were advocating, which is the same as the President I suppose.

    You're very seriously underestimating the influence that the hardliners have and the volatility of the situation. A "hardline" approach against Iran will shift national opinion sharply to the right. There is absolutely no doubt about that.
    I don't doubt they have a lot of influence, I am just saying the way to change that is arguably not to look even more weak and cave in terms in sanctions.

  10. #10
    Sage
    apdst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bagdad, La.
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:46 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    76,317

    Re: White House works to ease Iran proposal in Congress

    Quote Originally Posted by danarhea View Post
    Actually, the US let the situation slip through their fingers in 1953, when they sent in the CIA to overturn a democratic election in Iran, and then installed the Shah.
    It's a good thing we didn't install the current government. The people are no more satisfied with this boss than the last boss. I guess this time, the Iranian government has the world press on their side.
    Quote Originally Posted by Top Cat View Post
    At least Bill saved his transgressions for grown women. Not suggesting what he did was OK. But he didn't chase 14 year olds.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •