It's not a lie. You never once said "**** tuck, I'm sorry for implying you deleted the posts that weren't in tehis thread."
What have I been dishonest about?
No, it's pretty obviously there. I quoted the posts that prove my position has never changed. I can only lead the horse to water, if it chooses not to drink, that's on the horse.
Numerous times. With thrown rocks and with real weapons as well.
Was he being held in place by the guy?
My mistake. I meant to add "Tehy are not allowing the border agent this self-preservation option. If they choose to deny that option, they should be shot."
That is absolutely false. My position has
never changed. I posted my initial posts proving this already.
I've changed nothing. The only thing that could have changed is your understanding of my position. The only reason I can think of for your claim that I altered my position would be that you do not want to admit having not understood it before.
Yes. The pertinent factor between two different situations of
rock throwing.
Why do you ignore the facts? I was responding to a situation where an agent used lethal force against a person throwing rocks who was on the US side of th eborder. What is th edifference between that case adn this one.
Hint: It's the side of the border they were on.
See how easy that is.
In a comparison of two rock throwing incidents, yes. In those cases the side of th ebroder becoems the pertinent factor. All one needs to do is track down what that quote was in response to to see how
painfully obvious that is.
The most important tool necessary to determine that my position is wrong is an understanding of my position. It's not a personal attack to make a statemnt of fact. It's not like I told him he had earned my contemt or that he had no character or some other emotional drivel such as that.
What prevented the agent form moving? Was the suspect in custody holding him in place? If so, that would absolutley change my position about his rightful use of lethal force, although in that case I would say that he should have used it on the suspect in custody.
And are those links regarding the boat situation? That doesn't really contradict my position.
And anyone who actually understands what my position was, and always has been. Tehy might not agree with my position, but if they understand my position they at least know it has held up to your "scrutiny" (this is because you have yet to actually scrutinize my position)
That is a lie.