Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: UN 'to adopt' fourth round of Iran nuclear sanctions

  1. #1
    Guru

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Last Seen
    05-13-11 @ 09:01 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    4,075
    Blog Entries
    3

    UN 'to adopt' fourth round of Iran nuclear sanctions

    Link
    BBC News - UN 'to adopt' fourth round of Iran nuclear sanctions

    Quote(A resolution to impose a new round of sanctions on Iran is ready for a vote by the UN Security Council.)

    I cannot see Iran taking any more note of this latest round of sanctions than they have of those that have been previously set.

  2. #2
    Sage

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    New York
    Last Seen
    12-13-17 @ 12:40 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    11,691

    Re: UN 'to adopt' fourth round of Iran nuclear sanctions

    Quote Originally Posted by jujuman13 View Post
    Link
    BBC News - UN 'to adopt' fourth round of Iran nuclear sanctions

    Quote(A resolution to impose a new round of sanctions on Iran is ready for a vote by the UN Security Council.)

    I cannot see Iran taking any more note of this latest round of sanctions than they have of those that have been previously set.
    Given that the sanctions will largely be cosmetic in nature e.g., they won't affect Iran's critical oil production sector, they will likely have little or no impact on Iranian policy.

  3. #3
    Guru

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Last Seen
    05-13-11 @ 09:01 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    4,075
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: UN 'to adopt' fourth round of Iran nuclear sanctions

    Quote Originally Posted by donsutherland1 View Post
    Given that the sanctions will largely be cosmetic in nature e.g., they won't affect Iran's critical oil production sector, they will likely have little or no impact on Iranian policy.
    So in effect all this work that Clinton has done was a complete and utter waste of time?

  4. #4
    Global Moderator
    Moderator

    Zyphlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    NoMoAuchie
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    47,998

    Re: UN 'to adopt' fourth round of Iran nuclear sanctions

    And the next round of Breaking News

    *UN's fourth round of adopted Iranian Nuclear sanctions does nothing and are essentially ignored to the outrage of, well, no one in europe*

    followed by

    *Report out of U.N. now says Iran has the capacity for 4 nuclear weapons."

    Followed by

    *UN 'to adopt' fifth round of Iran nuclear sanctions*

    Repeat cycle

  5. #5
    Global Moderator
    Truth will set you free
    digsbe's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Metro Washington DC
    Last Seen
    Today @ 09:48 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    18,985

    Re: UN 'to adopt' fourth round of Iran nuclear sanctions

    Quote Originally Posted by Zyphlin View Post
    And the next round of Breaking News

    *UN's fourth round of adopted Iranian Nuclear sanctions does nothing and are essentially ignored to the outrage of, well, no one in europe*

    followed by

    *Report out of U.N. now says Iran has the capacity for 4 nuclear weapons."

    Followed by

    *UN 'to adopt' fifth round of Iran nuclear sanctions*

    Repeat cycle
    The cycle will end with "Iran now has nuclear weapons, international community welcomes them as a nuclear weapons bearing nation." Either this or "The Zionist regime of Israel has launched an attack against peaceful Iranian nuclear facilities. The UN condemns the harsh actions of the Zionist entity."
    When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser. -Socrates
    Tired of elections being between the lesser of two evils.

  6. #6
    Sage

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    New York
    Last Seen
    12-13-17 @ 12:40 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    11,691

    Re: UN 'to adopt' fourth round of Iran nuclear sanctions

    Just over a year ago, I noted that the new round of sanctions that were imposed on Iran would be "largely be cosmetic in nature" and would likely have "little or no impact on Iranian policy." Findings from the IMF's recently concluded Article IV consultation with Iran reveal just how weak the sanctions are. Select relevant findings:

    Economic growth rebounded from the cyclical downturn in 2008/09 to reach 3.2 percent for the 2010/11, spurred by a recovery in agriculture production, and higher oil prices...

    Other key macroeconomic indicators continued to improve in 2010/11. The overall fiscal surplus is estimated at 1.7 percent of GDP in 2010/11, reflecting prudent spending policies. The current account surplus increased to 6 percent of GDP in 2010/11, in line with the recovery of oil prices.


    Were truly crippling sanctions in place, Iran's economy would not be growing and Iran would not be benefiting from the rise in oil prices. Moreover, Iran would not be registering a current account surplus.

  7. #7
    Global Moderator
    May the force be with you
    Serenity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    18,934

    Re: UN 'to adopt' fourth round of Iran nuclear sanctions

    Quote Originally Posted by digsbe View Post
    The cycle will end with "Iran now has nuclear weapons, international community welcomes them as a nuclear weapons bearing nation." Either this or "The Zionist regime of Israel has launched an attack against peaceful Iranian nuclear facilities. The UN condemns the harsh actions of the Zionist entity."
    i'm sure the US, who still remains the only country in the world that has committed the crime of inflicting nuclear devastation on a nation not just once, but twice, might have something to say about that way before it got to that stage. don't you think?

    personally i don't like the fact that anyone has wmd. Obama talks so much of his push to rid the world of nuclear weapons. if Obama's push to rid the world of nuclear weapons, included his own then that would be a different story wouldn't it.

    how can any rational person not see how wrong that is? how can anyone try to justify a U.S. policy that kills where WMD don't exist after using that as an excuse to bomb the hell out of Iraq, and yet turns a blind eye and unconditionally supports other Countries and provides them with billions of dollars in foreign aid each year, where they obviously do? it's insane. the leaders have absolutely no integrity at all. it's so messed up.

    no one in their right mind would applaud Irans quest for nuclear weapon access, which is what you are suggesting here Digsbe. the UN will never welcome them as a nuclear weapons bearing nation. such a ridiculous comment.

    how about using some commons sense. if they can't be completely rid of them then goal should be to at the very least minimize nuclear arsenals (ourselves included) and raise treaties so it's an across the board agenda for all to follow and participate in.

    you really think Iran would be wanting nukes if no one else had them?

    i sure as hell don't.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •