Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Black lawmakers want to limit new ethics office

  1. #1
    Sage
    Renae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    San Antonio Texas
    Last Seen
    10-23-17 @ 10:14 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    38,972
    Blog Entries
    15

    Black lawmakers want to limit new ethics office

    WASHINGTON (AP) - Stung by a series of inquiries, nearly half the members of the Congressional Black Caucus want to scale back the aggressive ethics procedures that Democrats trumpeted after gaining control of Congress.
    Rep. Marcia Fudge, D-Ohio, and 19 fellow black lawmakers in the all-Democratic caucus quietly introduced a resolution last week that would restrict the powers of the new independent Office of Congressional Ethics. The office, formed by Congress in 2008, is run by a panel of private citizens.
    Black caucus Chairwoman Barbara Lee, D-Calif., is among the sponsors, but the full 42-member caucus did not endorse the measure. Lee declined comment through a spokesman.
    My Way News - Black lawmakers want to limit new ethics office

    I think the action of these 19 lawmakers show why we need this Ethics Office.
    Climate, changes. It takes a particularly uneducated population to buy into the idea that it's their fault climate is changing and further political solutions can fix it.



  2. #2
    Educating the Ignorant
    zimmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:31 PM
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    14,373
    Blog Entries
    12

    Re: Black lawmakers want to limit new ethics office

    quietly introduced a resolution

    Lee declined comment through a spokesman.
    Ahhh... so very ethical.

    .
    The Clintons are what happens...
    when you have NO MORAL COMPASS.

  3. #3
    Sage
    Renae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    San Antonio Texas
    Last Seen
    10-23-17 @ 10:14 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    38,972
    Blog Entries
    15

    Re: Black lawmakers want to limit new ethics office

    Quote Originally Posted by zimmer View Post
    Ahhh... so very ethical.

    .
    Amusing how no one wants to touch this.
    Climate, changes. It takes a particularly uneducated population to buy into the idea that it's their fault climate is changing and further political solutions can fix it.



  4. #4
    Liberal Fascist For Life!


    Redress's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Georgia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 08:47 PM
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    93,272
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Black lawmakers want to limit new ethics office

    It's funny how so many threads with republican misconduct or that have positive liberal messages you won't touch...

    From the link:

    The citizen-run ethics panel is far more open than the notoriously secretive standards committee, publicizing its referrals even when the standards committee finds no violations.

    Fudge's proposal would remove that power, and allow lawmakers on the standards committee to seal from public view the ethics office's findings on matters deemed meritless.

    The resolution also would make it harder for the ethics office to initiate investigations, requiring a sworn complaint from a citizen claiming personal knowledge of an alleged violation. That could prevent complaints from watchdog groups, for example.

    It would prevent the standards committee from taking a referral from the ethics office within 60 days before an election in which the subject of the case is a candidate.
    The first and third I have no problem with. A lawmaker cleared of wrongdoing should not have the claims publicized. He did nothing wrong. 60 days before an election makes sense since it avoids politicization of the process. That still leaves the vast majority of the time to investigate wrongdoing.

    The second one I disagree with the lawmakers on strongly. Limiting the ability to investigate wrongdoing is not what we should want.
    We became a great nation not because we are a nation of cynics. We became a great nation because we are a nation of believers - Lindsey Graham

    Quote Originally Posted by Fiddytree View Post
    Uh oh Megyn...your vagina witchcraft is about ready to be exposed.

  5. #5
    Sage
    Renae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    San Antonio Texas
    Last Seen
    10-23-17 @ 10:14 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    38,972
    Blog Entries
    15

    Re: Black lawmakers want to limit new ethics office

    Quote Originally Posted by Redress View Post
    It's funny how so many threads with republican misconduct or that have positive liberal messages you won't touch...
    I wish you'd show more intellectual honesty and not try these passive aggressive personal attacks against me.

    Quote Originally Posted by Redress View Post
    From the link:



    The first and third I have no problem with. A lawmaker cleared of wrongdoing should not have the claims publicized. He did nothing wrong. 60 days before an election makes sense since it avoids politicization of the process. That still leaves the vast majority of the time to investigate wrongdoing.

    The second one I disagree with the lawmakers on strongly. Limiting the ability to investigate wrongdoing is not what we should want.
    Only the first one do I agree with them on, 2 and 3 are bad.

    I don't care when the election is, misconduct is misconduct.
    Climate, changes. It takes a particularly uneducated population to buy into the idea that it's their fault climate is changing and further political solutions can fix it.



  6. #6
    Liberal Fascist For Life!


    Redress's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Georgia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 08:47 PM
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    93,272
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Black lawmakers want to limit new ethics office

    Quote Originally Posted by MrVicchio View Post
    I wish you'd show more intellectual honesty and not try these passive aggressive personal attacks against me.
    Ummm...I just turned your own words around...



    Only the first one do I agree with them on, 2 and 3 are bad.

    I don't care when the election is, misconduct is misconduct.
    I understand your point on three, but I worry that it could be used as a political tool. Even with 2 year elections, it's only 60 days out of 730 days that they cannot take a referral. That leaves plenty of opportunity and eliminates the worst of the possibility of political misconduct within the committee for either party.
    We became a great nation not because we are a nation of cynics. We became a great nation because we are a nation of believers - Lindsey Graham

    Quote Originally Posted by Fiddytree View Post
    Uh oh Megyn...your vagina witchcraft is about ready to be exposed.

  7. #7
    Sage

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Last Seen
    05-16-15 @ 02:32 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    12,537

    Re: Black lawmakers want to limit new ethics office

    i wonder why pelosi, hoyer, clyburn, van hollen, et al, aren't coming along?

    must be the body language

    whatcha hiding, ms lee?

    there aren't MORE charlie rangels, are there?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •