• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Israel intercepts Gaza flotilla, says Hamas

Anybody mind giving the legal precedent which allows Israel or any country to take over a ship in international waters?
 
Sorry Apoc, but I found that amusing. Accurate, but amusing.

I'm glad someone could find something amusing in this thread cause I just couldn't.
 
Right how would you feel at night when you are most vulnerable a bunch of commandos come armed dropping in from helicopters? I'd feel like it was time for me to spring into action because those commandos are probably wanting to kill me and I won't let them do it without a fight.

you mean after the repeated warnings?
 
The reason I called Israel a terrorist nation was cause Digsbe was so at ease just calling Palestine a terrorist nation. At least that was my impression.

I never said the Palestinians. I was talking about the PLO and Hamas along with other organizations that commit or support terrorism. I support a two state solution, but I also support Israeli security and I'm against Arab aggression. There are many crazy organizations and people who militantly oppose any kind of Jewish state in the Middle East, and these organizations (like Hamas, Hezbolah, and the PLO) deserve to be retaliated against and destroyed.
 
Anybody mind giving the legal precedent which allows Israel or any country to take over a ship in international waters?

I thought Israel was not signed on the international waters agreement?
Besides, the ship's intention was decalred, the direction was Gaza and peaceful solutions were refused by its leaders.
 
Anybody mind giving the legal precedent which allows Israel or any country to take over a ship in international waters?

Israel ain't signatory to the international treaties regarding international waters
 
I thought Israel was not signed on the international waters agreement?
Besides, the ship's intention was decalred, the direction was Gaza and peaceful solutions were refused by its leaders.

Do you really live in Israel?
 
The Republican party is a ****ing terrorist organization but still we tolerate them and their members.
:doh the Republican party is not a terrorist organization. Is a terrorist organization anyone that doesn't agree with you? Please stop the straw mans and absurd accusations.
 
No, I'm just writing Israel as my location because females dig it.

They think you are rich but just wait till they find out how frugal you are and that you have a small penis:lol::2razz::3oops::shock:
 
:doh the Republican party is not a terrorist organization. Is a terrorist organization anyone that doesn't agree with you? Please stop the straw mans and absurd accusations.

You make absurd accusations as well.
 
. They IDF knew full well what was in those ships, since Custom's allowed the different ships to move out of port from the Al Jazeera news report.
 
Anybody mind giving the legal precedent which allows Israel or any country to take over a ship in international waters?
The US Navy boards ships in international waters quite frequently and inspects for illicit drugs, counterfeit commercial goods, black-market weapons, nuclear proliferation materials, and human trafficking (slave ships). I think donsutherland1 covered immunity from boarding quite well in Post #58.
 
turns out Israel can have legal justification

The San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea was adopted in June 1994 after a series of round tables of naval and legal experts convened by the International Institute of Humanitarian Law. In paragraph 67 it permits belligerents to attack merchant vessels flying the flag of neutral States if they "are believed on reasonable grounds to be carrying contraband or breaching a blockade, and after prior warning they intentionally and clearly refuse to stop, or intentionally and clearly resist visit, search or capture". Paragraph 146 permits the capture of neutral merchant vessels outside neutral waters if they are engaged in any of the activities referred to in paragraph 67.[48] Yochanan Visser, a Dutch-language analyst for the Israel Facts Group, contended in an article for Het Vrije Volk that the provisions of the San Remo manual made Israel's action legal under international law.[49]

Gaza flotilla clash - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Last edited:
Please point out my absurd accusations and explain why they are absurd.
Ok, how about this for an absurd and excessive accusation. You are sounding like an old fart christian extremist and you are only 19.
 
They think you are rich but just wait till they find out how frugal you are and that you have a small penis:lol::2razz::3oops::shock:

I'm sorry to hear about your saddening experience with the female world.
 
Ok, how about this for an absurd and excessive accusation. You are sounding like an old fart christian extremist and you are only 19.

Please don't make personal attacks against me. I won't make any against you. Yes I am a Christian, and I will be 20 in two weeks. How is that absurd?
 
Israel ain't signatory to the international treaties regarding international waters

Not being signatory to a treaty does not mean a country is not subject to the laws within it. Israel can't simply take over a ship in international waters.
 
Please don't make personal attacks against me. I won't make any against you. Yes I am a Christian, and I will be 20 in two weeks. How is that absurd?

Ok. will refrain from that.
 
Ok, how about this for an absurd and excessive accusation. You are sounding like an old fart christian extremist and you are only 19.

Moderator's Warning:
Enough of the discussing of each other. Any more baiting will recieve consequences. This goes for everyone.
 
Back
Top Bottom