• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Teachers suspended for spraying non-Christian teacher w/ squirt bottle

T

Toothpicvic

Banned
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
1,801
Reaction score
462
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Note to Mods - link is NBC News - video is embedded in blog

Teachers in hot "holy" water. - Snake Snake's MySpace Blog |

Apparently they think their "1st Amendment" rights (to spray a fellow teacher with a squirt bottle) were violated - but apparently they weren't violating hers by attacking her for expressing her religious views. :rofl

BTW, why is it that these self-professed "Christian" bytches are always fat? Isn't gluttony a sin?
 
Last edited:
It says blog, do you understand what that means?
 
And in other news: 'Former fundie starts another thread about some off the wall Christian who did something weird'... :rolleyes:
 
MyOwnDrum said:
And in other news: 'Former fundie starts another thread about some off the wall Christian who did something weird'... :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

I think this calls for a poll.
MOD, get on it.
 
1069 said:
I think this calls for a poll.
MOD, get on it.
Click to expand...

Phew -- for a second, I thought you said "pole". I don't EVER want to see either one dancing on no pole!
 
Teachers suspended for spraying non-Christian teacher w/ squirt bottle
Click to expand...

Sounds like assault, to me, and grounds for termination.

Case closed.

Next?
 
Toothpicvic said:
Note to Mods - link is NBC News - video is embedded in blog

Teachers in hot "holy" water. - Snake Snake's MySpace Blog |

Apparently they think their "1st Amendment" rights (to spray a fellow teacher with a squirt bottle) were violated - but apparently they weren't violating hers by attacking her for expressing her religious views. :rofl

BTW, why is it that these self-professed "Christian" bytches are always fat? Isn't gluttony a sin?
Click to expand...

They should be fired. Period. I would have said the same if an atheist walked in and did it to a Christian.
 
FilmFestGuy said:
They should be fired. Period. I would have said the same if an atheist walked in and did it to a Christian.
Click to expand...

So should the athiest teacher for trying to spread her religion and it is a relgion because it requires faith to not believe in God.
 
texmaster said:
So should the athiest teacher for trying to spread her religion and it is a relgion because it requires faith to not believe in God.
Click to expand...
actually, that does deserve to be looked into
if the teacher was educating rather than proseletizing atheistic views, then no harm done
but if she is found to have been advocating an athiest viewpoint, then that is no different than a teacher advocating the adherance to any particular religion
 
justabubba said:
actually, that does deserve to be looked into
if the teacher was educating rather than proseletizing atheistic views, then no harm done
but if she is found to have been advocating an athiest viewpoint, then that is no different than a teacher advocating the adherance to any particular religion
Click to expand...

That's fair. The NBC video made it seem like it was a class discussion on atheism not so much proseletizing. But if she were, then that's something which would need to be handled as well. From the tone of the video, it sounds more like some teachers didn't particularly like the atheist dialog and embarrased the teacher in an unprofessional manner while she was teaching. If that is the case, then the actions taken were just.
 
texmaster said:
So should the athiest teacher for trying to spread her religion and it is a relgion because it requires faith to not believe in God.
Click to expand...

If she was preaching atheist views, ok. But it's not clear if that was what was going on. Also, it takes no faith to not believe in a god.
 
texmaster said:
So should the athiest teacher for trying to spread her religion and it is a relgion because it requires faith to not believe in God.
Click to expand...

She wasn't the one who committed assault.

edit: Wait, are you suggesting we should make expressing your religious views illegal?
 
Last edited:
texmaster said:
So should the athiest teacher for trying to spread her religion and it is a relgion because it requires faith to not believe in God.
Click to expand...

no.... it doesnt require faith to not believe in something that cant be proven.
 
texmaster said:
So should the athiest teacher for trying to spread her religion and it is a relgion because it requires faith to not believe in God.
Click to expand...

Actually, the Christian teachers have the right to spray water all they want, but if they spray water on someone else, without their permission, then they have violated that person's right to their wish to not be sprayed. All rights are based on property, and someone's body is his or her own property. It takes a Liberal to want to see the person who was violated fired too, 'ya Liberal. :mrgreen:
 
Ikari said:
If she was preaching atheist views, ok. But it's not clear if that was what was going on. Also, it takes no faith to not believe in a god.
Click to expand...

If she wasn't preaching and merely discussing yes I agree.
 
Deuce said:
She wasn't the one who committed assault.
Click to expand...

LOL Assult with a bottle of water. Now thats rich. And thats assuming she is telling the truth. The other teachers deny doing it.

edit: Wait, are you suggesting we should make expressing your religious views illegal?
Click to expand...

Yes thats exactly what I said. You do love fabricating the truth about your opponent don't you?
 
Caine said:
no.... it doesnt require faith to not believe in something that cant be proven.
Click to expand...

Of course it does. You cannot prove God doesn't exist so if you believe He doesn't that requires faith.
 
danarhea said:
Actually, the Christian teachers have the right to spray water all they want, but if they spray water on someone else, without their permission, then they have violated that person's right to their wish to not be sprayed. All rights are based on property, and someone's body is his or her own property. It takes a Liberal to want to see the person who was violated fired too, 'ya Liberal. :mrgreen:
Click to expand...

#1 I never said if they did this they didn't voilate the law.

#2 Of course it isn't liberal to want to keep an athiest teaching athiesm in a public school. What exactly are you smoking today? New supplier?
 
So you approve that this Christan teacher assaulted a person, because of their beliefs? I thought the continuation was something that the conservatives fought for instead it looks like you are someone who is a hypocrite.
 
texmaster said:
Of course it does. You cannot prove God doesn't exist so if you believe He doesn't that requires faith.
Click to expand...

Sure, if you say so...
 
Toothpicvic said:
Note to Mods - link is NBC News - video is embedded in blog

Teachers in hot "holy" water. - Snake Snake's MySpace Blog |

Apparently they think their "1st Amendment" rights (to spray a fellow teacher with a squirt bottle) were violated - but apparently they weren't violating hers by attacking her for expressing her religious views. :rofl

BTW, why is it that these self-professed "Christian" bytches are always fat? Isn't gluttony a sin?
Click to expand...

I love how that teabrain hag is trying to spin it as a 'breach of the first amendment'. No, dummy, it's not. Try again.

The Freedom to upbraid a fellow teacher in front of students?-- that's covered under which amendment.

Can't the tea party at least try to be consistent and back things that aren't far-right issues.
 
texmaster said:
#1 I never said if they did this they didn't voilate the law.

#2 Of course it isn't liberal to want to keep an athiest teaching athiesm in a public school. What exactly are you smoking today? New supplier?
Click to expand...

It is Liberal to interpret the Constitution is a loose constructionist way, which is exactly what you are doing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom