• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Canadian fighters scrambled after 'potential threat' on flight

Jetboogieman

Jetboogieman

Somewhere in Babylon
Moderator
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 12, 2010
Messages
35,178
Reaction score
44,136
Location
Somewhere in Babylon...
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
(CNN) -- Two Canadian fighter jets on Saturday escorted a Cathay Pacific Airways flight into Vancouver International Airport in response to a bomb threat on the plane, authorities said.

"A security issue raised on the ground in Vancouver meant extra security for the aircraft inbound to the airport and upon arrival," Gus Whitcomb, a spokesman for Cathay Pacific, said in a statement. "We are not aware of any issues arising on board the aircraft itself."

The security issue was a bomb threat that had been called in at 10:43 a.m. (1:43 p.m. ET), Cpl. Sherrdean Turley of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police told reporters outside the airport.
Click to expand...

Canadian fighters scrambled after 'potential threat' on flight - CNN.com
 
zimmer said:
Kanuckistan still has fighters?

You mean the Voodoos and CF-104's are still in operation?
Or did they scramble the Snowbirds in their ancient trainers?

.
Click to expand...

**** **** **** (*^*(&%$!)@*&^0!@^03^ 12

:2canadian:blowup::2canadian
 
zimmer said:
Kanuckistan still has fighters?

You mean the Voodoos and CF-104's are still in operation?
Or did they scramble the Snowbirds in their ancient trainers?

.
Click to expand...

CF-188's. Very effective.
 
Redress said:
It irritates me no end that they use the wrong name for them. They even mention it is really called the CF-188 in the first line, but still use the CF-18 designation...
Click to expand...

Did they buy 1 or 2?

;)

.
 
Redress said:
It irritates me no end that they use the wrong name for them. They even mention it is really called the CF-188 in the first line, but still use the CF-18 designation...
Click to expand...

They're F/A-18's with new stickers.
 
Jetboogieman said:
If I dissed your military, you'd be going ape****. So :kissass
Click to expand...

Well, what is there to diss about the US Military?
The best, best equipped, and trained fighting force on the planet.
With the state of the art American saving, enemy reducing toys.

With 2 C-5's we could transport almost all of Kanuckistan's military personnel and equipment. We could start in Esquimalt, hop to Cold Lake, Petawawa, and then to Goose Bay... that's about all that's left of the military... or? Ok, a couple other outposts... more for S&R than a military installation.

Kanuckistan, when it was known as Canada, had a great, brave fighting force. Now it's a bit bigger than a large Boy Scout troop, and about as well equipped. The US does yer protect'in and the heavy lifting darl'in.

That said, there are brave Canadians out there... too bad they are treated as they are, and too bad Kanuckistani's of today are a shadow of their former pioneering selves. It's a different country from the one Roderick Haig-Brown wrote about not too long ago.

The Sheeples of Kanuckistan, coming soon to the Discovery Channel.

.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom