Page 1 of 11 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 102

Thread: Holder Hasn't Read AZ Law He Criticized

  1. #1
    Sage

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Last Seen
    05-16-15 @ 02:32 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    12,537

    Holder Hasn't Read AZ Law He Criticized

    Holder hasn't read Arizona law he criticized - Washington Times

    Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr., who has been critical of Arizona's new immigration law, said Thursday he hasn't yet read the law and is going by what he's read in newspapers or seen on television.

    Mr. Holder is conducting a review of the law, at President Obama's request, to see if the federal government should challenge it in court. He said he expects he will read the law by the time his staff briefs him on their conclusions.

    "I've just expressed concerns on the basis of what I've heard about the law. But I'm not in a position to say at this point, not having read the law, not having had the chance to interact with people are doing the review, exactly what my position is," Mr. Holder told the House Judiciary Committee.

    This weekend Mr. Holder told NBC's "Meet the Press" program that the Arizona law "has the possibility of leading to racial profiling." He had earlier called the law's passage "unfortunate," and questioned whether the law was unconstitutional because it tried to assume powers that may be reserved for the federal government.

  2. #2
    Hippie Hater
    texmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Dallas TEXAS
    Last Seen
    08-20-15 @ 01:17 AM
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    3,969

    Re: Holder Hasn't Read AZ Law He Criticized

    This guy has got to be the most incompetent AG in our nation's history.

    He has been openly discussing taking legal action against a law he has never read.

    You don't get any worse.
    Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.

    John Adams

  3. #3
    Sage

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Last Seen
    05-16-15 @ 02:32 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    12,537

    Re: Holder Hasn't Read AZ Law He Criticized

    Some comments:

    1. Unbelievable.

    2. Completely incompetent.

    3. Comprehensively unprepared.

    4. Largely lacksadaisical, lazy and light headed.

    4. When's enough gonna be enough?

    5. He couldn't answer a simple who, when or where concerning Gitmo's closure.

    6. Hence NINTEY SENATORS smacked him down.

    7. He couldn't provide a pre-law-level PRECEDENT when it came to KSM's movement, since embarrassingly aborted, to Manhattan.

    8. He STILL CAN'T SAY where or how the terrorists will be tried.

    9. He PRECONVICTED the accused, rather crimping the purpose.

    10. He PROMISED that KSM and his creepy kind would NEVER BE RELEASED.

    11. He had to BACK DOWN on his immediate MIRANDIZING of the Mutallabs, precipitously pushing the PSE, public safety exception.

    12. Now he admits he's completely IGNORANT of the entire TEN PAGES of law he RIPS on all the Sunday talks.

    13. RACIAL PROFILING he lobs like a BOMB.

    14. Shades of Gates vs Crowley.

    15. Unconstitutional, he declares in the dark.

    16. The administration ADMITS it has NO immigration policy.

    17. There's "no appetite" this year, ad libs our impromptu prez.

    18. Instead, cheap politicizations are all he proffers.

    19. Reconditely REFUSING to enforce FEDERAL LAW on the border, he THROWS STONES at the PEOPLE OF ARIZONA for doing HIS job.

    20. His TALKING POINTS are "comprehensive immigration reform."

    21. Ok, but WHERE is it?

    22. WHEN?

    23. HOW?

    24. SQUAT is his ANSWER.

    25. The most incompetent administration in American history DOES IT AGAIN.

    The Prof

  4. #4
    Advisor
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Last Seen
    10-28-17 @ 10:53 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    488

    Re: Holder Hasn't Read AZ Law He Criticized

    Progressive ideologue, Holder....no different than our president, and Obama's latest nomination for SCOTUS

    These folks have an agenda...and it requires the destruction of America to succeed.
    Last edited by webrockk; 05-13-10 at 10:15 PM.

  5. #5
    Sage
    jamesrage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A place where common sense exists
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 09:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Conservative
    Posts
    31,067

    Re: Holder Hasn't Read AZ Law He Criticized

    Considering the fact pro-illegals and illegals have to resort to lies does anyone here actually believe Holder has not read the Arizona law he is criticizing? The only reason he says he hasn't read the law is because he doesn't plan on taking legal action against Arizona, taking legal action will result in him looking like a dumbass.
    "A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murder is less to fear"

    Cicero Marcus Tullius

  6. #6
    Guru

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Last Seen
    05-13-11 @ 09:01 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    4,075
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: Holder Hasn't Read AZ Law He Criticized

    Quote Originally Posted by jamesrage View Post
    Considering the fact pro-illegals and illegals have to resort to lies does anyone here actually believe Holder has not read the Arizona law he is criticizing? The only reason he says he hasn't read the law is because he doesn't plan on taking legal action against Arizona, taking legal action will result in him looking like a dumbass.
    Most folk realize he is a dumbass, in pretty much the same way as Obama, neither of them think before opening their mouths.

    An old saying comes to mind for all these wanna be Politicians.

    "Engage mind before engaging mouth'

  7. #7
    Advisor
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Last Seen
    10-28-17 @ 10:53 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    488

    Re: Holder Hasn't Read AZ Law He Criticized

    Quote Originally Posted by jujuman13 View Post
    Most folk realize he is a dumbass, in pretty much the same way as Obama, neither of them think before opening their mouths.

    An old saying comes to mind for all these wanna be Politicians.

    "Engage mind before engaging mouth'

    The political filth, in general, rely on 'we the peoples' short memories.

  8. #8
    Cheese
    Aunt Spiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Sasnakra
    Last Seen
    09-10-16 @ 06:10 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    28,433

    Re: Holder Hasn't Read AZ Law He Criticized

    I feel like a broken record:

    They never read ANY bill - no matter WHAT. Bill reading is not in their repertoire. They have attendees and other staff who read portions, summarize, and then report.
    A screaming comes across the sky.
    It has happened before, but there is nothing to compare it to now.
    Pynchon - Gravity's Rainbow

  9. #9
    Bus Driver to Hell
    Thorgasm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Last Seen
    12-06-17 @ 11:17 AM
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    68,191

    Re: Holder Hasn't Read AZ Law He Criticized

    You have two number fours.
    Quote Originally Posted by faithful_servant View Post
    Being a psychiatric patient does not mean that you are mentally ill.



  10. #10
    Advisor
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Last Seen
    11-20-17 @ 01:31 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    346

    Re: Holder Hasn't Read AZ Law He Criticized

    He possibly could have read the law, deciding no legal basis for a court challenge. Making such remarks to save face within the party. Another possibility, waiting for someone else to file a challenge, then file a "Friend of the Court" brief.
    Last edited by Redbeard; 05-13-10 at 11:11 PM.

Page 1 of 11 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •