• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Holder Hasn't Read AZ Law He Criticized

Crunch said:
They would have to read it first...... ain't gunna happen because then they'd have to lie about what they read and we all know they would never do that ..... it's easier not to read it and just spout nonsense. :mrgreen:
Click to expand...

They probably did read it and still chose to ignore it and then when called on it they will just claim they have yet to read it. These people have to resort to lies regarding the illegal immigration issue. For example they claim anyone against illegal immigration is a xenophobic racist, they claim a multi-ethnic/multiracial group such as the minutemen is a racist vigilante group, they lump illegals with immigrants, they paint all Hispanics as being pro-illegals, they claim that illegal immigration is not a crime even though it is punishable up to six months in jail according to Title 8 Section 1325 of the U.S. Code, "Improper Entry by Alien," , and now they are lying about Arizona's law as allowing racial profiling.
 
jamesrage said:
The media is pro-illegal, so one of Bush's AG's criticizing Arizona's anti-illegal immigration law without first reading it would not have been scandalous and Bush would be tossing Calderon's salad just as Obama did regarding illegal immigration.
Click to expand...



Yeah, you're right about that, however I was talking about how brazen this administration appears that they can go on television and trash something, misrepresent it, outright lie about it, then turn around and say that they haven't read it.


j-mac
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom