Want to know the first sign your arguments weak? When you start playing spelling nazi. Yeah, sorry, don't give a **** enough about arguing with you to sit here and run everything through spell check or read read things a dozen times to see if I didn't accidently hit the s key before I hit the e.
There's nothing "revisionist" about what I typed, its simply a different view point. One contrary to what's typically thought of and viewed by American History classes.
I'll give you a free be here. You may not want to tell posters to get the **** out, its uncivil and its flaming, figure I'd be kind and say it here since you're doing it to a mod so that another doesn't come from behind and act on it.
But fine, since you want to nit pick and continue to dance around the question...fine, take my exact same question and remove your questionable "revisionist" part. Have it simply a southern heritage class that focuses on the other reasons, ALONG with Slavery, that the south went to war (or are you seriously claiming slavery was the first, second, and ONLY reason). Have it still study Jackson and Lee. Have it look at the Southern Culture of that time. Have it look at what Southerns have contributed to the country since then.
Nothing revisionist there, nothing that can even be claimed to be revionist. So again, how about rather than getting on your little soap box because you can't dare to actually admit you're being amazingly biased and hypocritical, grabbing onto one little line and using it as if nothing else within it existed, and now answer the question truthfully and honestly.