Matthew 10:34Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.
Look, there's nothing wrong with supporting Kagan and I think she'll be fine on the court, but this is just ridiculous. I don't know who told you that she was some world-famous constitutional scholar, but they didn't know what they were talking about. She's smart and very talented in her field (which is not constitutional law), but that doesn't mean you should just make up superlatives about her simply because they sound good.
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
Did any of you happen to catch Charlie Rose last night? They had a discussion on her.
Have you noticed...out of the box...the left is "complaining" that she's too "centrists". A new strategy I'm detetecting here...but, just the same old blatant lies, and intellectual dishonesty to insure "social justice" for all on the backs of the few.
Never, ever trust a leftist...they're morally bankrupt, and will look you in the eye as they lie about and obfuscate their "progressive" (communist) plans for America.
“I think if Thomas Jefferson were looking down, the author of the Bill of Rights, on what’s being proposed here, he’d agree with it. He would agree that the First Amendment cannot be absolute.” - Chuck Schumer (D). Yet, Madison and Mason wrote the Bill of Rights, according to Sheila Jackson Lee, 400 years ago. Yup, it's a fact.
Ironic how you're so bothered by lies and damn lies when your boy W. lead us into a war over a lie.Have you noticed...out of the box...the left is "complaining" that she's too "centrists". A new strategy I'm detetecting here...but, just the same old blatant lies, and intellectual dishonesty to insure "social justice" for all on the backs of the few.
$900 billion pissed away 4700 Americans dead and that doesn't bother you in the least, but the left building up a supreme court nomination by a Democratic president and you've got your panties in a bundle...
Lookiing back over the last decade, I'd say you've got it all backwards. The righties and neo-con men have been screwing you left and right. Scumbaggery of the highest order and the GOP-Fox News sheep just get down on their knees and lap it up like a bunch of dogs...Never, ever trust a leftist...they're morally bankrupt, and will look you in the eye as they lie about and obfuscate their "progressive" (communist) plans for America.
so using the lib standards I suggest you post up or be considered a liar as I was told.
and tell me how my analysis is faulty. The law says a man may marry a woman. IF we get into whether there is an attraction what is an objective standard soon morphs into a subjective one.
[ame=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coalition_to_Stop_Gun_Violence]Coalition to Stop Gun Violence - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame]
1974, the United Methodist General Board of Church and Society formed the National Coalition to Ban Handguns, a group of thirty religious, labor, and nonprofit organizations with the goal of addressing "the high rates of gun-related crime and death in American society" by licensing gun owners, registering firearms, and banning private ownership of handguns with "reasonable limited exceptions" for “police, military, licensed security guards, antique dealers who have guns in unfireable condition, and licensed pistol clubs where firearms are kept on the premises.” In the 1980s and 1990s, the coalition grew to 44 member groups. In 1989, the National Coalition to Ban Handguns changed its name to the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence, in part because the group felt that "assault rifles" as well as handguns, should be outlawed.[
VPC - Handgun Ban Fact Sheet
homicides, suicides, and unintentional shootingsï are carried out with easily concealable pistols and revolvers. The public health model as well as the traditional approaches employed in protecting consumer health and safety lead to one inevitable conclusion: handguns should be banned
two major dem supporting groups. try again