- Joined
- May 13, 2009
- Messages
- 20,627
- Reaction score
- 14,970
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
It was on their views that the organization was established. They are relevant because they are the foundation and backbone of why the organization operates.Founder's views are irrelevant.
Why though? The man was donating with the intent of specifically wanting to kill black babies. Money is money regardless of who holds it, but should they accept donations from a blatant racist that wants to use Planned Parenthood to further his racist agenda through black abortions?They should accept donations from anyone who will donate. Racist or not. Racist's money spends just as good as non-racists.
Why not in the suburbs though? As stated before, 60% of abortions are roughly white women. They are still the majority. One can argue that the black abortion rate is higher because they target those areas. Do you think it would be different if they weren't in black neighborhoods and were primarily located in white ones or in the suburbs?They put clinics in neighborhoods that need them, which are poorer neighborhoods, which are often minority neighborhoods.
They market it by being in the black neighborhoods. They aren't going to be openly racist about marketing campaigns, but they target black women through the location that they chose to put their clinic in. The fact is that the organization had no opposition to accepting money from a blatant racist, they were founded by a racist eugenicist, and they even agreed with the racist on the phone saying it was "understandable" to want to kill black babies.How can they "go out of their way" to ensure and promote abortions for black women? Tell me how they market this service to black women. Show me their racist marketing campaign. Hell, show me ANY abortion marketing campaign. I'll just wait over there while you spin your wheels.