Please quote me accurately.
And you wanted evidence? No problem. From the fort hood thread:
And another:What new information suggests he was a "sleeper agent"?
And another:Who put him in the wings? For what terrorist group was he acting as a "sleeper agent"? These terms have meanings. You clearly don't understand them.
You thanked the guy above for his post.How can there be "no question"??
All I've seen was a bunch of people scared of muslims ranting on and on about what flavour of muslim he was and why he was out to kill americans??
The reality of the situation is that IF this was the case :
- He became a citizen
- joined the millitary
- became a psychiatrist
- and then waited to be deployed
BEFORE going out, grabbing some guns and starting to shoot up the base...
I hate to break it to you, but the reality is that this situation most closely resembles the MO of a psychiatrist that was depressed, self-diagnosed himself a prescription of some SSRI drug that created in him a psychotic episode where he simply grabbed his guns and started shooting
Oh, so this guys guilty of being a muslim, therefore it's not a simple mass shooting, but a 'terrorist attack'... come on... seriously?
And you "thanked" him for that postThere were even more warning signs that might have alerted the Army in recent months:
— In the days and weeks before the shooting, Hasan voiced his objections to Muslims fighting the war on terror to members of his mosque, the Islamic Community of Greater Killeen. Congregants at the mosque said he voiced his objections to Muslims serving in the U.S. military and to his impending deployment to Afghanistan.
— Over the summer, Hasan's comments led Osman Danquah, co-founder of the mosque, to recommend that it deny Hasan's request to become a lay Muslim leader at Fort Hood, the Associated Press reported.
There are others but I don't want to be found guilty of child abuse so I'll stop.
If you would like to further embarrass yourself Catz, please let me know
Last edited by texmaster; 05-04-10 at 10:01 AM.
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
Print Story: NYC bomb suspect nabbed aboard Dubai-bound plane - Yahoo! NewsNYC bomb suspect nabbed aboard Dubai-bound plane
By TOM HAYS and COLLEEN LONG, Associated Press Writers Tom Hays And Colleen Long, Associated Press Writers 1 hr 15 mins ago
NEW YORK – A U.S. citizen who had recently returned from a five-month trip to his native Pakistan, where he had a wife, was arrested at a New York airport on charges that he drove a bomb-laden SUV meant to cause a fireball in Times Square, federal authorities said.
Faisal Shahzad was on board a Dubai-bound flight at Kennedy Airport when FBI agents and New York Police Department detectives took him into custody late Monday, law enforcement officials said. One official said he claimed to have acted alone.
U.S. authorities "will not rest until we have brought everyone responsible to justice," Attorney Eric Holder said early Tuesday, suggesting additional suspects are being sought.
Shahzad, 30, is a naturalized U.S. citizen and had recently returned from a five-month trip to Pakistan, where he had a wife, according to law enforcement officials who spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the investigation into the failed car bombing.
What they are saying is that the vast, vast majority of the Tea Partiers are sane individuals with no history or penchant for terrorist attacks and that jumping to the conclussion its a "tea partier" based on absolutely nothing...no history of terrorist attacks, no prevelance of terrorist attacks, etc....is idiotic.
Sure, any large group is going to have some nut balls in it on the fringes. That doesn't mean that you should rush to judgement that its that group's member that did something when that kind of person would be the exception, not the rule for the group.
"This must've been a McDonald's worker! What? You don't agree? What do you think ALL McDonald workers are clean as the wind driven snow? No, then it must have been a McDonald's worker".
Suggestions that "OMG it was a tea partier" is just ab out as ridiculous as the above.
No one is saying that the Tea Party, or any group, is absolutely pure. What they are saying is its incredibly to jump to a conclussion that its even likely or plausible that it was a Tea Partier when there's been no history or basis to even make such a suggestion.
"I am appalled that somebody who is the nominee...would take that kind of position"
"A court took away a presidency"
"...the brother of a man running for president was the governor of the state..."
It's horrifying because Trump is blunt instead of making overt implications.