- Joined
- Jul 31, 2005
- Messages
- 36,705
- Reaction score
- 17,867
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
People may interpret things diferently. I may see things diferently than you and you see things diferently than me. ?
There is a difference between interpretation and blatantly lying. The pro-illegals are blatantly lying about what the bill does. Even before the modification the bill did not allow police to walk up to anyone to prove their legal status. This has been explained over and over again. LAWFUL CONTACT must first be made, that means you must be pulled over for speeding or some other traffic violation, that means DUI checks and other forms of lawful police contact. The pro-illegals are blatantly lying about what the bill does in order to demonize it.
The founding fathers had that all figured out that is why they created the Supremes and the Supremes have that great hit called InTerPreTaTion !!!
So in a 5 to 4 decision are you saying that the 4 who voted that way are liars
Most of that stuff does not need interpretation it just needs to be taken literally and what the intentions were when each of those amendments were written, not some BS modern interpretation.