• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ariz. governor signs immigration enforcement bill

Chappy

User
DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 24, 2009
Messages
2,443
Reaction score
733
Location
San Francisco
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Liberal
Excerpted from “Ariz. governor signs immigration enforcement bill” By PAUL DAVENPORT and JONATHAN J. COOPER, Associated Press, 20 minutes ago
[SIZE="+2"]A[/SIZE]rizona's tough immigration enforcement bill will become law despite being criticized by President Obama as 'misguided."

Gov. Jan Brewer signed the bill into law on live television on Friday. It takes effect in 90 days after the current legislative sessions in the next several weeks.

Brewer says the law "protects every Arizona citizen."

The sweeping legislation makes it a crime under state law to be in the country illegally. It would also require local police officers to question people about their immigration status if there is reason to suspect they are illegally.

Obama said in Washington the measure could violate people's civil rights and said he's instructed the Justice Department to see if it is legal. …

Wow! Just, wow! This bill is a colossal error.
 
Wow! Just, wow! This bill is a colossal error.
Well, if the Democrats get a pass for the healthcare turd then Az. gets a pass on this IMO. It's a bad law but "something needed to be done", yall remember that right?
 
Early Arizonan reaction to the bill signing is dismay and vows to take the state to court.

Excerpted from “Arizona governor signs immigration law; foes promise fight” by Alia Beard Rau, The Arizona Republic, Apr. 23, 2010 01:47 PM
[size="+2"]H[/size]ispanic leaders addressing the hundreds of protesters at the Capitol immediately vowed to wage a legal fight. …

… [T]he anti-bill protesters began shouting in unison, "Shame on You! Shame on You!"

A handful of teenage girls was seen openly weeping after it was announced that Brewer had signed the bill. …

Maricopa County Supervisor Mary Rose Wilcox said afterwards that the American Civil Liberties Union and the Mexican-American Defense Fund have already promised to fight implementation of the law.

"This is only the first step of a long battle, and I don't lose,'" Wilcox said.

She also chastized Brewer, calling her cold-hearted.

"When the president says this is wrong, it's a shame she put herself above him,'' Wilcox said. …
 
You can't blame Arizona at all on this. I don't see the problem with it. If you are here illegally, what is wrong with a state picking up the slack for the federal government? After all, the costs for medical care, housing, crime, and public education associated with those that come here illegally is primarily born by the states, so why not let the states help enforce immigration law?

I am left of center on a lot of issues. But the fact is, we can't afford to provide education and healthcare for the kids of every illegal that makes it across the Sonora Desert.
 
Last edited:
From what I understand about the bill I support it. Why not have a law to enforce laws? Arizona made a smart decision in passing this legislation. Crack down on illegal immigration and charge them with their crimes.
 
FANTASTIC!

Finally someone standing up to criminals!
 
Most voting Arizonans want the Mexicans to go home....so she didn't have much choice but to sign in. She would never retain office any other way.
 
I believe we will see massive displays of direct action against this law in the form of demonstrators refusing to hand over their papers. There will be boycotts and conferences and conventions will be canceled. This will be 1990 all over again.
 
I believe we will see massive displays of direct action against this law in the form of demonstrators refusing to hand over their papers. There will be boycotts and conferences and conventions will be canceled. This will be 1990 all over again.

Oh yes. We should just let people break our laws and to hell with the people who die along the way.
 
I believe we will see massive displays of direct action against this law in the form of demonstrators refusing to hand over their papers. There will be boycotts and conferences and conventions will be canceled. This will be 1990 all over again.

Great, they can go to jail for breaking the law and be exposed as people who support breaking immigration laws. Let them protest, I have no sympathy for them. What about the law abiding citizens or legal immigrants in Arizona? All Arizona is doing is making it a state offense to commit a federal crime, they are also taking measures to enforce the law. Is this a bad thing? If anything it's a wonderful thing. I applaud Arizona for passing this bold legislation :applaud
 
Great, they can go to jail for breaking the law and be exposed as people who support breaking immigration laws. Let them protest, I have no sympathy for them. What about the law abiding citizens or legal immigrants in Arizona? All Arizona is doing is making it a state offense to commit a federal crime, they are also taking measures to enforce the law. Is this a bad thing? If anything it's a wonderful thing. I applaud Arizona for passing this bold legislation :applaud

Law abiding citizens don't count. If they are robbed or killed thats just something you are going to have to accept. Didn't you get the memo?
 
You can't blame Arizona at all on this. I don't see the problem with it. If you are here illegally, what is wrong with a state picking up the slack for the federal government? After all, the costs for medical care, housing, crime, and public education associated with those that come here illegally is primarily born by the states, so why not let the states help enforce immigration law?
.

This is why I find it hilarious when pro-illegals say illegal immigration a federal issue.If it was a federal issue then the federal should be picking up the tab for those things. But then again even if it is the feds picking up the tab it is still tax payer money which comes form the states. So illegal immigration is a state problem.
 
Wow! Just, wow! This bill is a colossal error.

How is it a colossal error? And please none of that pro-illegals propaganda.
 
The issue is that in Arizona, you are now required by law to carry with you at all times proof of your citizenship or legal entry into the state and that a police officer can demand those papers for any reason; you are wearing the wrong sneakers; the shape of your hat suggests a foreign style, etc. I find it interesting that a non-Arizona drivers license may be insufficient proof that you are here legally.
 
The issue is that in Arizona, you are now required by law to carry with you at all times proof of your citizenship or legal entry into the state and that a police officer can demand those papers for any reason; you are wearing the wrong sneakers; the shape of your hat suggests a foreign style, etc. I find it interesting that a non-Arizona drivers license may be insufficient proof that you are here legally.

Could you please specifically cite where the bill says that?
The sweeping legislation makes it a crime under state law to be in the country illegally. It would also require local police officers to question people about their immigration status if there is reason to suspect they are illegally.
This is from your own source, all I see in it is that the police now have the right to question people about their immigration status if they have a good reason to. There is nothing wrong with that in my opinion, in fact it's a good thing.
 
So, are there really people mad about a state passing a law that says people in the country illegally are breaking the law?
 
Wow! Just, wow! This bill is a colossal error.



So... enforcing the law is a colossal error?

Making something a state crime because the Fedgov isn't doing anything remotely effective is stupid?
 
This is why I find it hilarious when pro-illegals say illegal immigration a federal issue.If it was a federal issue then the federal should be picking up the tab for those things. But then again even if it is the feds picking up the tab it is still tax payer money which comes form the states. So illegal immigration is a state problem.

The U.S. government sets immigration law. Not the states. It is a federal issue.
 
Could you please specifically cite where the bill says that? …

Let's see what the Cato Institute says …

Excerpted from ‘“Papers, Please” in Arizona’ Posted by Jim Harper, CATO@Liberty, April 22, 2010 @ 1:46 pm
[SIZE="+2"]T[/SIZE]he Arizona legislature recently sent Senate Bill 1070 to the governor.

According to this summary from the Arizona legislature, the bill would require Arizona officials and agencies to determine the immigration status of any person with whom they have “lawful contact” where reasonable suspicion exists regarding the immigration status of the person. Any person arrested in Arizona would also have to have their immigration status established and verified with the federal government before they were released.

The documents that can be used to prove legal immigration status under the bill include a valid Arizona driver license, a valid Arizona nonoperating identification license, a valid tribal enrollment card or other tribal identification, or a valid federal-, state- or local-government-issued identification, if the issuing entity requires proof of legal presence before issuance.

If the governor signs the bill, what creates “reasonable suspicion” about immigration status is a question that will have lawyers busy for years.

I’m interested in how well practiced Arizonans and Arizona government officials will become at checking the papers of people in their state. …
 
It doesn't say that people are forced to carry those things with them at all times though. I think it's fine to have people validate themselves. All it's saying is that you must validate yourself before you are released and then lists what counts as acceptable validation.
 
Another question is how much safer will Arizonans be with new law being enforced …

“The Arizona immigration law will likely hinder federal law enforcement from carrying out its priorities of detaining and removing dangerous criminal aliens. With the strong support of state and local law enforcement, I vetoed several similar pieces of legislation as Governor of Arizona because they would have diverted critical law enforcement resources from the most serious threats to public safety and undermined the vital trust between local jurisdictions and the communities they serve. I support and am actively working with bipartisan members of Congress to pass comprehensive immigration reform at the federal level because this issue cannot be solved by a patchwork of inconsistent state laws.” — Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, Gov. Jan Brewer's predecessor as Arizona governor
 
Reasons to never go to Arizona:

[X] Crazy hot.
[X] Can't find a good beach anywhere.
[X] Immigration laws which make everyone and anyone an illegal immigrant.

---------------

Arizona is the new Alaska only Alaska wins cause they have glaciers.
 
Back
Top Bottom