Page 7 of 13 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 129

Thread: Iranian Missile May Be Able to Hit U.S. by 2015

  1. #61
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Last Seen
    01-03-16 @ 02:05 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    12,761

    Re: Iranian Missile May Be Able to Hit U.S. by 2015

    Quote Originally Posted by Vader View Post
    Because Iran is nation governed by insance islam-o-nazi zealot assholes who are hellbent on creating nuclear weapons. I suspect they would do so to use them on Israel.

    While Islam governs a nation, that nation is unworthy to have nuclear weapons. Period.

    Iran MUST be disarmed immediately.
    I don't think you really quite understand just how RETARDED this logic is...

    First off, Iran doesn't even have the capacity to enrich uranium to a level that is useable for nuclear weapons. They are being quite forthcoming about these developments for nuclear reactors. But that's not even the point I was going to make...

    This same retarded logic was used on Sadam... 'he has nukes so we have to invade because he's a crazy dictator with nukes'. (To paraphrase, don't make me hunt down the exact quotes, thanks)

    So, OUR BEST SOLUTION to stopping a crazed dictator with nuclear weapons is to invade his country and give him all the reason to MAKE USE of those same weapons that you are trying to prevent from being used. The thing about a crazed dictator is that he will have a good hiding spot, SO, he'll have ample opportunity as his last expression of power launch those nuclear weapons, and you'll have made matters worse.

    That's like trying to stop drunk driving by opening a drive-thru shooter bar.

  2. #62
    Outer space potato man

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:19 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    51,709

    Re: Iranian Missile May Be Able to Hit U.S. by 2015

    Quote Originally Posted by Agent Ferris View Post
    And what would stop them from giving this missile technology to others willing to use it the same as they have with their current missile technology?


    Where exactly is some terrorist group going to put this?
    He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear
    Quote Originally Posted by Lutherf View Post
    We’ll say what? Something like “nothing happened” ... Yeah, we might say something like that.

  3. #63
    Sage

    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:40 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Liberal
    Posts
    8,351

    Re: Iranian Missile May Be Able to Hit U.S. by 2015

    Quote Originally Posted by BmanMcfly View Post
    I don't think you really quite understand just how RETARDED this logic is...

    First off, Iran doesn't even have the capacity to enrich uranium to a level that is useable for nuclear weapons. They are being quite forthcoming about these developments for nuclear reactors. But that's not even the point I was going to make...

    This same retarded logic was used on Sadam... 'he has nukes so we have to invade because he's a crazy dictator with nukes'. (To paraphrase, don't make me hunt down the exact quotes, thanks)

    So, OUR BEST SOLUTION to stopping a crazed dictator with nuclear weapons is to invade his country and give him all the reason to MAKE USE of those same weapons that you are trying to prevent from being used. The thing about a crazed dictator is that he will have a good hiding spot, SO, he'll have ample opportunity as his last expression of power launch those nuclear weapons, and you'll have made matters worse.

    That's like trying to stop drunk driving by opening a drive-thru shooter bar.
    I wonder what your reaction here would be if Iran gave a missle with the bomb to Venezuela. Sounds like that should be fine with the people who do not mind if Iran gets the bomb.

    If that would trouble you, please explain why.

  4. #64
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    United States
    Last Seen
    01-21-16 @ 12:21 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    51,124

    Re: Iranian Missile May Be Able to Hit U.S. by 2015

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post


    Where exactly is some terrorist group going to put this?
    Right here:



  5. #65
    Libertarian socialist

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Staffs, England
    Last Seen
    12-01-17 @ 11:26 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    6,730

    Re: Iranian Missile May Be Able to Hit U.S. by 2015

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post


    Where exactly is some terrorist group going to put this?
    Is that a missile in your pocket..............

  6. #66
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Last Seen
    01-03-16 @ 02:05 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    12,761

    Re: Iranian Missile May Be Able to Hit U.S. by 2015

    Quote Originally Posted by washunut View Post
    I wonder what your reaction here would be if Iran gave a missle with the bomb to Venezuela. Sounds like that should be fine with the people who do not mind if Iran gets the bomb.
    Why would Iran give a missile to Venezuela?? How would that be a benefit to Iran?

    If that would trouble you, please explain why.
    I couldn't see that happening...

    I know everyone thinks that middle easterners are all crazy jihadists out to destroy america and it's allies... but let's think REAL here.

    When was the last time you heard war rhetoric against north korea?? (Hint: it was after they showed the world that they had a nuclear arsenal) That's because the principle I'm talking about is REAL. Nuclear weapons are a bigger defensive weapon then an offensive weapon, that is unless you get a nuclear bomb into a suitcase and smuggle it into the target country.

    That's because there's a lag time of several hours between the launch of a nuclear weapon and it's hitting the target. In that time, the retaliatory strike can be launched. What would be the point of winning a war if there's an 80% loss of your people and the annihilation of all the important infrastructure of your country??

    So, yes... it's retarded to say : He has nukes so we must invade... especially if the person is REALLY as crazy as he's sold in the media (true for both Iraq and Iran), because if the person REALLY does have the weapons and you invade, then this 'crazed dictator' will unleash all the fury they can muster before being killed.

  7. #67
    Banned Goobieman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Last Seen
    03-22-15 @ 02:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    17,343

    Re: Iranian Missile May Be Able to Hit U.S. by 2015

    Let us all thank GWB for ignoring the rants from the anti-US left and press onward with the development and deployment of the NMD.

  8. #68
    Banned Goobieman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Last Seen
    03-22-15 @ 02:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    17,343

    Re: Iranian Missile May Be Able to Hit U.S. by 2015

    Quote Originally Posted by BmanMcfly View Post
    So, OUR BEST SOLUTION to stopping a crazed dictator with nuclear weapons is to invade his country...
    Who is talking about invading and occupying Iran?

  9. #69
    Sage

    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:40 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Liberal
    Posts
    8,351

    Re: Iranian Missile May Be Able to Hit U.S. by 2015

    Quote Originally Posted by BmanMcfly View Post
    Why would Iran give a missile to Venezuela?? How would that be a benefit to Iran?



    I couldn't see that happening...

    I know everyone thinks that middle easterners are all crazy jihadists out to destroy america and it's allies... but let's think REAL here.

    When was the last time you heard war rhetoric against north korea?? (Hint: it was after they showed the world that they had a nuclear arsenal) That's because the principle I'm talking about is REAL. Nuclear weapons are a bigger defensive weapon then an offensive weapon, that is unless you get a nuclear bomb into a suitcase and smuggle it into the target country.

    That's because there's a lag time of several hours between the launch of a nuclear weapon and it's hitting the target. In that time, the retaliatory strike can be launched. What would be the point of winning a war if there's an 80% loss of your people and the annihilation of all the important infrastructure of your country??

    So, yes... it's retarded to say : He has nukes so we must invade... especially if the person is REALLY as crazy as he's sold in the media (true for both Iraq and Iran), because if the person REALLY does have the weapons and you invade, then this 'crazed dictator' will unleash all the fury they can muster before being killed.
    It was a hypothetical question, which no one cared to answer.

  10. #70
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Last Seen
    01-03-16 @ 02:05 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    12,761

    Re: Iranian Missile May Be Able to Hit U.S. by 2015

    Quote Originally Posted by Goobieman View Post
    Who is talking about invading and occupying Iran?
    Oh nobody in particular... now, this was off a quick search for front page youtube vids from news sources and a quick search for "Iran war" with google news... if you really want I could poke around deeper, but let's not be delusional.

    1 - Palin letting it slip that there is intention to go to war with Iran
    [nomedia="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4D9LofMCa8A"]YouTube- Palin Declares War on Iran[/nomedia]

    2 - A compilation of news source rhetoric going on comparing Iraq to Iran
    [nomedia="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-eyuFBrWHs"]YouTube- FOX ATTACKS: Iran[/nomedia]

    3 - http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2010/...ames-gulf.html

    4 - Discussion of sanctions
    The slippery slope to strikes on Iran - Flynt Leverett & Hillary Mann Leverett - POLITICO.com

    5 - And again
    Gates Says U.S. Lacks a Policy to Thwart Iran - NYTimes.com

Page 7 of 13 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •