When the first one does finally go off it will no doubt be in Washington D.C. and many Innocent people will be killed along with those in the Obama administration and Government.
I hope a contingency has been worked out to have someone in charge after such an attack.
I don't quite understand the use of the term terrorists in the story because I thought these were going to be "man-caused" disasters according to Homeland Secretary Janet baby.
Well with the lackadaisical attitude Obama has about terrorists and how he bows to those who support them in the middle east it's only a matter of tiime before Hillary will be proved right.
I wonder if the terrorists will make sure Obama is out of town when they set one off. They wouldn't want to hurt him.
Is Obama sympathetic to them or just pathetic?
From The Times April 12, 2010
Terrorists including al-Qaeda pose a serious threat to world security as they attempt to obtain atomic weapons material, Hillary Clinton, the US Secretary of State, declared on the eve of a global summit in Washington to prevent a nuclear terror attack.
President Obama will call on the leaders of 47 nations today — the biggest gathering of heads of state by a US leader since the founding of the UN in 1945 — to introduce tougher safeguards to prevent nuclear material ending up in the hands of terrorists. As far back as 1998, Osama bin Laden stated that it was his Islamic duty to acquire and use weapons of mass destruction.
During the two-day Nuclear Security Summit, Mr Obama will try to convince representatives, including David Miliband. who is standing in for Gordon Brown, that the dangers of loosely guarded atomic material are so grave that a global agreement is needed to stop al-Qaeda going nuclear.