- Joined
- Dec 23, 2009
- Messages
- 16,881
- Reaction score
- 2,980
- Location
- virginia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Private
At least I don't try to lie about it.
That's what pathological liars say.
At least I don't try to lie about it.
That's what pathological liars say.
So he's lying about what he said about liberals and DNA?
Which is it?
Please let us know which face is talking next time.
Don't get in a lather, hoss.
I am saying he is talking in absolutes or in other words tunnel vision rhetoric.
I'm not. Just exposing your hypocrical statements :2wave:
Then say that next time.
So he's lying about what he said about liberals and DNA?
Which is it?
Please let us know which face is talking next time.
I don't think lying is in anyone's DNA do you?
:rofl Have you read some of the posts at the link you provided? Very funny stuff! As you're reading, you can actually begin to imagine the author eating out of Obama's hand before each new paragraph.
"What should I say next?" asked the pawn. "Just tell the people I'm creating jobs," replied Obama. "And don't forget to add a bit of crisis in the mix to make sure people are scared into believing what you say about me."
Oh dear, this was the first thread I looked at after googling "best political forum" and seeing the "bias optional, civlity a must" rubric. And the first post in the thread repeatedly uses the insulting "tea bagger" and goes downhill from there. Where I come from "civility" means you accord your opponents the presumption of good will, don't consider them "morons," etc.
Well, I'll try.
I am of two minds on this story, assuming it happened at all, which I don't accept as a given. First one is, this is the biggest domestic policy measure since the 1930s and will affect the lives and fortunes of every American, so of course emotions run high, and of course a few nuts or marginal viewpoints become unhinged by it - so what? Making that an "issue" is pure partisan exploitation. (Of course there were no unhinged remarks back when war protests were the thing, were there? Hah!)
The second is the very real possibility that these were agents provocateurs engaged by some far left interest or group. A group like BAMN is perfectly capable of such an act, and probably individuals associated with ACORN also.
Had I been there I would have questioned the individual closely, and if it wasn't apparent that he wasn't just a complete whacko or moron, tried to follow him back to a car to get a license plate number. A real journalist (they're the ones who view political events skeptically rather than at face value) would use that number to find the vehicle's owner and look for lefty associations.
The
Oh dear, this was the first thread I looked at after googling "best political forum" and seeing the "bias optional, civlity a must" rubric. And the first post in the thread repeatedly uses the insulting "tea bagger" and goes downhill from there. Where I come from "civility" means you accord your opponents the presumption of good will, don't consider them "morons," etc.
Well, I'll try.
I am of two minds on this story, assuming it happened at all, which I don't accept as a given. First one is, this is the biggest domestic policy measure since the 1930s and will affect the lives and fortunes of every American, so of course emotions run high, and of course a few nuts or marginal viewpoints become unhinged by it - so what? Making that an "issue" is pure partisan exploitation. (Of course there were no unhinged remarks back when war protests were the thing, were there? Hah!)
The second is the very real possibility that these were agents provocateurs engaged by some far left interest or group. A group like BAMN is perfectly capable of such an act, and probably individuals associated with ACORN also.
Had I been there I would have questioned the individual closely, and if it wasn't apparent that he wasn't just a complete whacko or moron, tried to follow him back to a car to get a license plate number. A real journalist (they're the ones who view political events skeptically rather than at face value) would use that number to find the vehicle's owner and look for lefty associations.
The
I disagree Vader. They went through a lot of hard knocks and abuse to get there despite overwhelming hatred from their opponents.
"We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone", was a sign that was before you were born. I remember traveling the South in the early sixties. All the eateries had a segregated window that said "colored" above it.
I don't think you have any idea of what they went through.
[/quote]I had a black friend in the army who was a friend of Medgar Edwards and he told me a few stories about what it was like growing up in Cleveland, Tenn; where everybody with a pickup truck had guns in rifle racks and cb radios.
Medgar Evers - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
HAHAHAHHA
Andrew Breitbart offers to give 10 grand to the united negro college fund for any solid evidence that the word "nigger" was thrown at the black congressman as they claim.
So far, NO MONEY HAS HAD TO BE PAID :rofl
It’s time for the allegedly pristine character of Rep. John Lewis to put up or shut up. Therefore, I am offering $10,000 of my own money to provide hard evidence that the N- word was hurled at him not 15 times, as his colleague reported, but just once. Surely one of those two cameras wielded by members of his entourage will prove his point.
2010: A Race Odyssey — Disproving a Negative for Cash Prizes or, How the Civil Rights Movement Jumped the Shark - Big Government
You need to understand that many of us were not aware of the 'urban' definition of the term "tea baggers" and it's digusting consotation. Therefore if we used it it was because of the understanding that it was a knickname for people who usd the tea bag to symbolize the tea party which they in turn "borrowed" from our history. .
Gee, what do you think? :roll:Just curious ?? Do you use the term "teabaggers" as an insult or were you as I was not aware of the filthy act that it apparently implies and did you consider them "teabaggers" becasue they hung tea bags from their hats?
Gee, what do you think? :roll:
I don't remember them calling themselves teabaggers. Is that the case?If a liberal group had NAMED THEMSELVES the "butt munchers" or something like that without knowing what it meant, you'd be calling them that for years, and you know it. And I wouldn't blame you one bit. That's just too damn good to let go.
I don't remember them calling themselves teabaggers. Is that the case?
At least the democrats say things besides , no.
Because 515 Billion dollars a year on the defense budget is the Right's idea of fiscal conservatism. It's a recession, money needs to be spent.
I don't remember them calling themselves teabaggers. Is that the case?
Tea party protesters use racial epithet against Georgia's John Lewis - Yahoo! News
Tea party protesters use racial epithet against Georgia's John Lewis
....
The protesters also shouted obscenities at other members of the Congressional Black Caucus ..
That was the real disgrace of yesterday and the behavior of those Tea Baggers reflected upon the majority of them since the maority of the Tea Baggers did nothing to stop much behavior. !!!
sad sad sad !!!