Page 10 of 17 FirstFirst ... 89101112 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 165

Thread: Dutch fury at US general's gay theory over Srebrenica

  1. #91
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    LIBTARDISTAN
    Last Seen
    05-01-10 @ 11:38 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    3,629

    Re: Dutch fury at US general's gay theory over Srebrenica

    Quote Originally Posted by TheNextEra View Post
    Of course you do, because it is against gays and we all know how much you hate gays. You are prolly one of the ignorant people that thought only gays can get AIDS.
    I don't hate them, I just hate when they flamingly flaunt it....
    That was the case in the beginning, until gays on the 'down low' spread it to the hetero population.....

  2. #92
    Dungeon Master
    Somewhere in Babylon
    Jetboogieman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Somewhere in Babylon...
    Last Seen
    @
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    24,296
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Dutch fury at US general's gay theory over Srebrenica

    Quote Originally Posted by Partisan View Post
    That was the case in the beginning, until gays on the 'down low' spread it to the hetero population.....
    What the hell is that suppose to mean?

  3. #93
    Hippie Hater
    texmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Dallas TEXAS
    Last Seen
    08-20-15 @ 01:17 AM
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    3,969

    Re: Dutch fury at US general's gay theory over Srebrenica

    Quote Originally Posted by Redress View Post
    You are trying too hard. Let's look at an actual normal dictionary to see how most people use the word "hearsay". Hearsay | Define Hearsay at Dictionary.com


    –noun
    1.
    unverified, unofficial information gained or acquired from another and not part of one's direct knowledge: I pay no attention to hearsay.
    2.
    an item of idle or unverified information or gossip; rumor: a malicious hearsay.
    –adjective
    3.
    of, pertaining to, or characterized by hearsay: hearsay knowledge; a hearsay report.

    Interesting, no requirement mentioned for a court for something to be hearsay.
    And in keeping with your dishonest persona you don't even provide the link to your definition nor did you answer my challenge to find where it is used in a Senate sub committee.

    Once again your dishonesty rules the day.

    And I can give you more definitions where it specifically mentions a court of law and unlike you, I'll be honest enough to link to those definitions.

    Hearsay is information gathered by one person from another concerning some event, condition, or thing of which the first person had no direct experience. When submitted as evidence, such statements are called hearsay evidence. As a legal term, "hearsay" can also have the narrower meaning of the use of such information as evidence to prove the truth of what is asserted. Such use of "hearsay evidence" in court is generally not allowed.

    [ame=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hearsay]Hearsay - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame]

    Hearsay in United States law

    [ame=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hearsay_in_United_States_law]Hearsay in United States law - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame]

    And in that entire article it never ever discusses the Senate sub committee as a place where hearsay is used anywhere.

    Now, the reason I doubt his word is because it's hearsay,
    Again not a court of law which you laughably tried to wiggle out of.

    Your dishonesty is trying to use a term only used in a court of law and apply it to a hearing before the Senate in some vain attempt to discredit what he reporting hearing from the Dutch Army chief of staff.

    and as such useless, and there is an actual report done on the situation(we call this "evidence") that comes to a different conclusion. You believe only what you want to believe, whereas the rest of us look at the evidence and draw conclusions.
    So, you have no evidence that he is lying.

    NONE. ZERO. ZIP NADA. You have only your emotional feelings to base that on.

    What a despicable excuse to distrust a man who served our country for decades honorably.
    Last edited by texmaster; 03-20-10 at 02:31 PM.
    Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.

    John Adams

  4. #94
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    LIBTARDISTAN
    Last Seen
    05-01-10 @ 11:38 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    3,629

    Re: Dutch fury at US general's gay theory over Srebrenica

    Quote Originally Posted by Andalublue View Post
    Boy, I loved that. I wish I'd been able to do that! Do you think that kid will be calling many more people "Faggot"?
    So, is it a hate crime when a gay assaults a straight person?....
    That's all I saw in that video.....

  5. #95
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    LIBTARDISTAN
    Last Seen
    05-01-10 @ 11:38 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    3,629

    Re: Dutch fury at US general's gay theory over Srebrenica

    Quote Originally Posted by Jetboogieman View Post
    What the hell is that suppose to mean?
    Aids started in the gay community, or do you dispute that?.....

  6. #96
    Dungeon Master
    Somewhere in Babylon
    Jetboogieman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Somewhere in Babylon...
    Last Seen
    @
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    24,296
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Dutch fury at US general's gay theory over Srebrenica

    Quote Originally Posted by texmaster View Post
    NONE. ZERO. ZIP NADA. You have only your emotional feelings to base that on.

    What a despicable excuse to distrust a man who served our country for decades honorably.
    I dont think the issue should be whether he's lying or not. I dont believe he is lying about what he was told.

    But that doesnt make it fact that it was what caused the massacre, nor does it make the Dutch Chief of Staff right either, how do we know that man doesnt have massive prejudices?

  7. #97
    Dungeon Master
    Somewhere in Babylon
    Jetboogieman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Somewhere in Babylon...
    Last Seen
    @
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    24,296
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Dutch fury at US general's gay theory over Srebrenica

    Quote Originally Posted by Partisan View Post
    Aids started in the gay community, or do you dispute that?.....
    In the news... no one knows for absolutely sure when or where AIDS started. Unless you're willing to provide absolute evidence for patient 000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 then that train of thought does not compute.

  8. #98
    Hippie Hater
    texmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Dallas TEXAS
    Last Seen
    08-20-15 @ 01:17 AM
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    3,969

    Re: Dutch fury at US general's gay theory over Srebrenica

    Quote Originally Posted by Jetboogieman View Post
    I dont think the issue should be whether he's lying or not. I dont believe he is lying about what he was told.
    But you are the ONLY one against this that actually understands that. The rest including most articles blame the general himself. Thats my problem with all of this. The dishonesty in attacking the messenger in this case the US general.

    Signature changed just for that reason!

    But that doesn't make it fact that it was what caused the massacre, nor does it make the Dutch Chief of Staff right either, how do we know that man doesnt have massive prejudices?
    I'm 100% with you. It does not mean the general is right. But without any recant by the witness he named, there is no logical reason to deny that is what he said.

    And I would submit to you if this chief of the army really does have a prejudice against homosexuals himself then we would have heard about it.

    Now an honesty inquiry would be welcome. Not simply calling any solider in the Dutch army a bigot or homophobe but actually look at the recruiting numbers, the battles that have been fought and perform an honest evaluation.
    Last edited by texmaster; 03-20-10 at 02:37 PM.
    Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.

    John Adams

  9. #99
    Dungeon Master
    Somewhere in Babylon
    Jetboogieman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Somewhere in Babylon...
    Last Seen
    @
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    24,296
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Dutch fury at US general's gay theory over Srebrenica

    Quote Originally Posted by texmaster View Post
    And I would submit to you if this cheif of the army really does have a prejudice against homosexuals himself then we would have heard about it.
    I don't know about that. He's Chief of Staff for the Dutch army. Not Fred Phelps. How much Public knowledge do you think exists about a dude's personal beliefs who was in charge years ago

  10. #100
    Hippie Hater
    texmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Dallas TEXAS
    Last Seen
    08-20-15 @ 01:17 AM
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    3,969

    Re: Dutch fury at US general's gay theory over Srebrenica

    Quote Originally Posted by Jetboogieman View Post
    I don't know about that. He's Chief of Staff for the Dutch army. Not Fred Phelps. How much Public knowledge do you think exists about a dude's personal beliefs who was in charge years ago
    Former soldiers for one would be a great source. My point is you cannot dismiss his words simply because you don't like the answer.
    Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.

    John Adams

Page 10 of 17 FirstFirst ... 89101112 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •