A misunderstanding of evolution? Can you think of any other way other than using technology to procreate? I'd love to hear this one.This shows a misunderstanding of evolution. Design requires some one to do the design, which I do not believe in.
Of course it is. Heterosexual sex is the only means of procreation yet you want to claim the very act of procreation being heterosexual intercourse is not genetic when it is the only way to pass genetics from one generation to another.Never denied basic reproduction, but it has nothing to do with your claim that heterosexuality is genetic.
How does that not compute in your mind?