There is no such thing as a “Natural Born Dual-Citizen“.
Originally Posted by PogueMoran
I didnt have to read the article to tell you that you cant read.
In other words-no state, municipal, local or federal civilian law enforcement agency should be able to use weapons that the political entity controlling that agency has declared are too dangerous for other civilians to merely possess.
Once a political entity has determined that a weapon is suitable for civlian law enforcement officers to be provided by our tax dollars, that political entity should be estopped from banning the possession of such weapons by other honest civilians
You know the time is right to take control, we gotta take offense against the status quo
Originally Posted by A. de Tocqueville
Neither side in an argument can find the truth when both make an absolute claim on it.
I'm pretty sure TN is not the only state where this is allowed.
A prerequisite of getting a CCW is having a history of being a law-abiding citizen... the stats back up that law-abiding CCW permit holders cause far less trouble than the general population.
It is the people who are inclined to break the law who are the problem, and they don't base their decision to go armed or not on whether it is legal or not.
For decades, the pendulum swung way too far to the side of disarming honest citizens in the name of "public safety". However, now the pendulum is swinging the other way, and it has momentum. A lot of this is because people have realized that gun control laws in the US do not have positive effects on crime, but armed citizens do.
Fiddling While Rome Burns
Carthago Delenda Est
"I used to roll the dice; see the fear in my enemies' eyes... listen as the crowd would sing, 'now the old king is dead, Long Live the King.'.."