Page 85 of 97 FirstFirst ... 3575838485868795 ... LastLast
Results 841 to 850 of 967

Thread: Navy will soon let women serve on subs

  1. #841
    King Of The Dog Pound
    Black Dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    South Florida
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    34,495

    Re: Navy will soon let women serve on subs

    Quote Originally Posted by Moot View Post
    Benjii likes the protests...he'd be largely irrelevant without them. So he needs to speak where he knows there will be protests against him and that makes him responsible for the protests.
    Quote Originally Posted by Absentglare View Post
    You can successfully wipe your ass with toilet paper, that doesn't mean that you should.

  2. #842
    Professor
    CrusaderRabbit08's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Last Seen
    05-13-10 @ 02:41 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    2,022

    Re: Navy will soon let women serve on subs

    Quote Originally Posted by Blackdog View Post
    No it does not hold true today. It did not hold true when I was in, let alone over 20 years later.
    I just told you that a combat medic was a different MOS from the various hospital medical MOS's. You can't take a respiratory specialist (68V) and assign him as a combat medic (68W) overnight. He'll have to go back to school for at least 4 months to get training in that MOS.

  3. #843
    Sage
    Navy Pride's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Pacific NW
    Last Seen
    05-07-15 @ 02:01 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    39,883

    Re: Navy will soon let women serve on subs

    Quote Originally Posted by Gibberish View Post
    So there are many that are unable to meet the mental requirements of their post? Not to mention, for those that are married, their inability to stay faithful to their wedding vows.
    I am going to ask you the same question I asked a couple of lefties awhile back who ignored my question...

    Your in a foxhole and being over run by the enemy......who would you rather have in the hole with you a 100 lb woman or a 200 lb man?
    "God Bless Our Troops in Harms Way."

  4. #844
    Goddess of Bacon

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Charlottesville, VA
    Last Seen
    05-28-12 @ 09:35 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    13,988

    Re: Navy will soon let women serve on subs

    Quote Originally Posted by Navy Pride View Post
    I am going to ask you the same question I asked a couple of lefties awhile back who ignored my question...

    Your in a foxhole and being over run by the enemy......who would you rather have in the hole with you a 100 lb woman or a 200 lb man?
    I don't know any women who weigh 100lbs.

    But what would their weight have to do with their ability? I'd rather have a person most qualified. Not an overweight man, and not an anorexic woman. Why go to opposite ends of the spectrum? How about giving healthy weights for either gender? How about giving their respective abilities? Who's the better shot?
    Last edited by rivrrat; 02-28-10 at 11:58 PM.

  5. #845
    King Of The Dog Pound
    Black Dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    South Florida
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    34,495

    Re: Navy will soon let women serve on subs

    Quote Originally Posted by CrusaderRabbit08 View Post
    I just told you that a combat medic was a different MOS from the various hospital medical MOS's. You can't take a respiratory specialist (68V) and assign him as a combat medic (68W) overnight. He'll have to go back to school for at least 4 months to get training in that MOS.
    It is only open to soldiers holding the rank of SGT nonpromotable and below. The 68V course is for in-service personnel only and is not open for Initial Entry Training. Soldiers holding the MOS 68A, 68P, 68K, or 68WM6 may not apply.

    Things have changed, like I said.
    Quote Originally Posted by Moot View Post
    Benjii likes the protests...he'd be largely irrelevant without them. So he needs to speak where he knows there will be protests against him and that makes him responsible for the protests.
    Quote Originally Posted by Absentglare View Post
    You can successfully wipe your ass with toilet paper, that doesn't mean that you should.

  6. #846
    Sage
    Navy Pride's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Pacific NW
    Last Seen
    05-07-15 @ 02:01 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    39,883

    Re: Navy will soon let women serve on subs

    Quote Originally Posted by rivrrat View Post
    I don't know any women who weigh 100lbs.

    But what would their weight have to do with their ability? I'd rather have a person most qualified. Not an overweight man, and not an anorexic woman.
    Some day I will introduce you to my wife.....she weighs 98 smd is not anorexic......

    I did not say the man was over weight you did........Both people equal in being in shape.........give me the 200 lb guy every time...........
    Last edited by Navy Pride; 03-01-10 at 12:07 AM.
    "God Bless Our Troops in Harms Way."

  7. #847
    Goddess of Bacon

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Charlottesville, VA
    Last Seen
    05-28-12 @ 09:35 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    13,988

    Re: Navy will soon let women serve on subs

    Quote Originally Posted by Navy Pride View Post
    Some day I will introduce you to my wife.....she weighs 98 smd is not anorexic......

    I did not say the man was over weight you did........Both people equal in being in shape.........give me the 200 lb guy every time...........
    Give me the PERSON most qualified. I don't give a **** if that person has tits or balls. Irrelevant.

  8. #848
    Sage
    Navy Pride's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Pacific NW
    Last Seen
    05-07-15 @ 02:01 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    39,883

    Re: Navy will soon let women serve on subs

    Quote Originally Posted by rivrrat View Post
    Give me the PERSON most qualified. I don't give a **** if that person has tits or balls. Irrelevant.

    And 100 times out of 100 that would be the guy......
    "God Bless Our Troops in Harms Way."

  9. #849
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    In your dreams...
    Last Seen
    05-29-12 @ 02:53 PM
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    10,621

    Re: Navy will soon let women serve on subs

    Quote Originally Posted by Navy Pride View Post
    I am going to ask you the same question I asked a couple of lefties awhile back who ignored my question...

    Your in a foxhole and being over run by the enemy......who would you rather have in the hole with you a 100 lb woman or a 200 lb man?
    I could kiss the woman before I died.

  10. #850
    Goddess of Bacon

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Charlottesville, VA
    Last Seen
    05-28-12 @ 09:35 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    13,988

    Re: Navy will soon let women serve on subs

    Quote Originally Posted by Navy Pride View Post
    And 100 times out of 100 that would be the guy......
    So you think, because you have an antiquated sexist worldview. I disagree. I don't think a penis is required to shoot a gun well.

Page 85 of 97 FirstFirst ... 3575838485868795 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •