I got a few minutes, so what the hell, I will play the game.
And you would dismiss the reality of what is wasted in the area of intelligence under Obama's new interrogation methods.[
You're right. I'm not satisfied with just capturing terrorists which had nothing to do with Obama. I'm also concerned with how much information we get from them under Obama's new rules.
And you have no proof, no solid evidence we won't get everything we want from him, nor that there is any likelihood we will get more using methods Obama does not allow. You are, in fact, just throwing a hissy to hide the fact that something good has happened, which does not fit the narrative you like.
Thats a lie. Giving terrorists American civilian rights absolutely makes it harder to obtain information. What a shocker you have already ignored the underwear bomber fiasco.
Proof that this is true? Show some way that it is relevant to anything I have said.
Oh BULL****. Afghanistan yes but you are bald face lying when you claim liberals generally support the war on terror. Hell, you;ve got a president and VP who declared Iraq a failure before they were even elected when they refused to support the surge.
The war in Iraq was not the war on terror. It distracted from the war on terror.
You are a person who follows a party.
Oh BULL****(to quote you)! I belong to a party, because it most closely matches my beliefs. I have also, with some frequency, disagreed with my party. The party I choose comes from my beliefs, my beliefs do not come from my party. It's one of those differences between us. This difference means I am capable of, and have, spoken highly of those in other parties, given credit to them when they do right, and generally avoid the role of ideologue. You however, as this thread shows, cannot manage this simple exercise in critical thinking. When something good happens under a president you don't like, you find something to get upset about.
What a surprise you would ignore your party's past under Bush and how they viewed the war on terror then.
Your hypocrisy is showing Redress.
Again.
What a surprise, you ignore how the whole country came together after 9/11, supported Bush right up until he started getting stupid again and wanting to invade Iraq. We supported Bush in Afghanistan, we supported the war on terror. Not all of us, but I think most, in fact far and away most. This is not hypocrisy.
Further, even though I did not agree with the war in Iraq, I still was please when Saddam was captured. I was still proud of our troops and the job they did over there, and did not find ways to throw a fit every time they did things well and had a large success. I will leave such things to you.