Page 28 of 29 FirstFirst ... 1826272829 LastLast
Results 271 to 280 of 285

Thread: Obama ‘Agnostic’ on Deficit Cuts, Won’t Prejudge Tax Increases

  1. #271
    Banned Goobieman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Last Seen
    03-22-15 @ 02:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    17,343

    Re: Obama ‘Agnostic’ on Deficit Cuts, Won’t Prejudge Tax Increases

    Quote Originally Posted by Goldenboy219 View Post
    I did claim a fact.... That it would have been much worse. How much worse is, of course, my opinion.
    Nice try at equivocation. Nothing changes. You've still done exactly what I said you would do for exactly the reason I said you would.

    Now run away with that tail tucked tight.

  2. #272
    I'm not-low all the time
    Kushinator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    West Loop
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:52 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    16,257

    Re: Obama ‘Agnostic’ on Deficit Cuts, Won’t Prejudge Tax Increases

    Quote Originally Posted by Goobieman View Post
    Nice try at equivocation. Nothing changes. You've still done exactly what I said you would do for exactly the reason I said you would.

    Now run away with that tail tucked tight.
    Is this yet another attempt to avoid sound economic discussion?.?.? When you feel up to the challenge (instead of hiding behind a game of antics), we can have a debate on the subject.

    Unless of course you aspire to get your ass handed to you in a true debate involving the macro economy?
    It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion.
    "Wealth of Nations," Book V, Chapter II, Part II, Article I, pg.911

  3. #273
    Banned Goobieman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Last Seen
    03-22-15 @ 02:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    17,343

    Re: Obama ‘Agnostic’ on Deficit Cuts, Won’t Prejudge Tax Increases

    Quote Originally Posted by Goldenboy219 View Post
    Is this yet another attempt to avoid sound economic discussion
    Ironic that you whine about avoiding 'sound economic discussion' when yours is based on 'facts' that you you know cannot prove -- as you have illustrated for everyone, quite plainly.

  4. #274
    I'm not-low all the time
    Kushinator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    West Loop
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:52 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    16,257

    Re: Obama ‘Agnostic’ on Deficit Cuts, Won’t Prejudge Tax Increases

    Quote Originally Posted by Goobieman View Post
    Ironic that you whine about avoiding 'sound economic discussion' when yours is based on 'facts' that you you know cannot prove -- as you have illustrated for everyone, quite plainly.


    It is common knowledge that without government intervention, the macro economy would have been worse than it is now. How much worse? Think 1930's.

    red = fact

    blue = opinion

    You can stop trying to discuss my words unless you have nothing else to bring to the discussion. Are you afraid of a debate on the macro economy?
    It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion.
    "Wealth of Nations," Book V, Chapter II, Part II, Article I, pg.911

  5. #275
    Banned Goobieman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Last Seen
    03-22-15 @ 02:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    17,343

    Re: Obama ‘Agnostic’ on Deficit Cuts, Won’t Prejudge Tax Increases

    Quote Originally Posted by Goldenboy219 View Post
    It is common knowledge that...
    As I said before... Nice equivocation. Nothing changes.

    Your continued equivocations and attempts to get out of having to prove your claims -- just as I predicted -- serve only illustrate your eagerness to self-sodomoze your credibility as a sentient being.

    Oh, and regarding this little bit of petulance:
    Done arguing with a child.
    One of two things is true:
    -This is a lie
    -I'm not a child
    Your call.

  6. #276
    I'm not-low all the time
    Kushinator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    West Loop
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:52 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    16,257

    Re: Obama ‘Agnostic’ on Deficit Cuts, Won’t Prejudge Tax Increases

    Quote Originally Posted by Goobieman View Post
    As I said before... Nice equivocation. Nothing changes.

    Your continued equivocations and attempts to get out of having to prove your claims -- just as I predicted -- serve only illustrate your eagerness to self-sodomoze your credibility as a sentient being.

    Oh, and regarding this little bit of petulance:

    One of two things is true:
    -This is a lie
    -I'm not a child
    Your call.
    I've now switched focus towards convincing you to have a general debate on the macro economy given the global financial system's composition in the last 8 years. Up for it? Or would you rather argue sentence structure?
    It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion.
    "Wealth of Nations," Book V, Chapter II, Part II, Article I, pg.911

  7. #277
    Banned Goobieman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Last Seen
    03-22-15 @ 02:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    17,343

    Re: Obama ‘Agnostic’ on Deficit Cuts, Won’t Prejudge Tax Increases

    Quote Originally Posted by Goldenboy219 View Post
    I've now switched focus....
    Rather than continue to avoid the point, why don't you man up and admit that you made a claim that you know you cannot support?
    Last edited by Goobieman; 02-23-10 at 12:26 PM.

  8. #278
    I'm not-low all the time
    Kushinator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    West Loop
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:52 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    16,257

    Re: Obama ‘Agnostic’ on Deficit Cuts, Won’t Prejudge Tax Increases

    Quote Originally Posted by Goobieman View Post
    Rather than continue to avoid the point, why don't you man up and admit that you made a claim that you know you cannot support?
    I did confirm that i made a claim that was impossible to support. We call those opinions. You should know!

    With that aside, are you interested in a debate concerning the macro economy in the absence of various stabilization policies enacted since q4 2008? Petty squabbles regarding sentence structure and meaning do not interest me.

    If you are afraid, you may decline.
    It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion.
    "Wealth of Nations," Book V, Chapter II, Part II, Article I, pg.911

  9. #279
    Banned Goobieman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Last Seen
    03-22-15 @ 02:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    17,343

    Re: Obama ‘Agnostic’ on Deficit Cuts, Won’t Prejudge Tax Increases

    Quote Originally Posted by Goldenboy219 View Post
    I did confirm that i made a claim that was impossible to support. We call those opinions.
    YOU called it a fact.
    Man up.

  10. #280
    I'm not-low all the time
    Kushinator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    West Loop
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:52 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    16,257

    Re: Obama ‘Agnostic’ on Deficit Cuts, Won’t Prejudge Tax Increases

    Quote Originally Posted by Goobieman View Post
    YOU called it a fact.
    Man up.
    Didn't call "think 1930's" a fact. You took it as one in an attempt to argue with me without having to provide sound analysis of the economy.

    Why are you afraid to debate me in this subject, yet have all the nerve in the world to argue my sentence structure?
    It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion.
    "Wealth of Nations," Book V, Chapter II, Part II, Article I, pg.911

Page 28 of 29 FirstFirst ... 1826272829 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •