Because if not, and you're just assuming, then should we likewise ban any christian from sitting on such cases cause it could be "assumed" they would rule against it?
My opponent is a liar, and he can not be trusted
This election began like a car wreck; a bad thing, but I couldn't help but look away. It's now more like a beheading video; a sickening display where I can't hit the red X fast enough.
I'd like to point out, once again, that all of these unfounded assumptions about the judge's political views are a tacit admission that anti-gay marriage policies are designed to screw over gay people, and not out of any legitimate belief about the institution of marriage.
Are you coming to bed?
I can't. This is important.
Someone is WRONG on the internet! -XKCD
And who cares if the judge is gay anyway? What you think being attracted to men somehow hinders his ability to reason?II - All Opening Post threads posted in *BN* must have:
• Static link to an article from a bona-fide news organization.
• Dateline within the past 48 hours.
• Exact same title as the cited article.
• Quoted short excerpts from the article.
• Your own unique content to spur discussion.
Last edited by Jerry; 02-11-10 at 08:50 PM.