• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Palin Blasts Emanuel for Calling Dem Idea 'Retarded'

jackalope said:
Game - Set - Match.
Click to expand...

Only because you tend to be Redress's little fluffer when you can't make arguments yourself.

There was no "endgame" in that. Just more of Redress transferring her own shortcomings on to others.

Show me once where I just "made crap up" and then she might have had something of a point. But I didn't. It's just more of Redress's PDS FAIL.
 
jallman said:
She didn't blast him for being politically incorrect. She blasted him for making statements that hit an issue close to her and for being disrespectful while carrying out the duties of a public office.
Click to expand...

She "blasted" him simply to keep he name in the news. Watch what pickyune **** she tweets about.
 
Erod said:
So let me take inventory for a second so I know the new liberal rules:

You can't call people "terrorists".

But you can call them "retards".

OK, got it.
Click to expand...

Enough with this stuff. Nobody has stated any "liberal rules." Just for you, I officially give you permission to call someone a terrorist whenever you want.
 
ADK_Forever said:
She "blasted" him simply to keep he name in the news. Watch what pickyune **** she tweets about.
Click to expand...

Why are you watching her tweets if you dislike her so much? Does she even tweet or are you just frothing at the mouth again like you did yesterday?
 
jallman said:
Why are you watching her tweets if you dislike her so much? Does she even tweet or are you just frothing at the mouth again like you did yesterday?
Click to expand...

Same reason people look at car wrecks.
 
My mistake - I see the news articles that says Palin did see Perry's comments.
 
jallman said:
Only because you tend to be Redress's little fluffer when you can't make arguments yourself.

There was no "endgame" in that. Just more of Redress transferring her own shortcomings on to others.

Show me once where I just "made crap up" and then she might have had something of a point. But I didn't. It's just more of Redress's PDS FAIL.
Click to expand...


Not at all, Jallman.

It's cuz yer girl is a hypocritical whiny thing and Red got it exactly right. Also, I'm happy to let others speak, so have no trouble giving props to others. I don't feel the need to occupy all the space. Not at all.



What you made up in the post Red responded to? You made yourself a biggggg ole strawman:


So I will take that as a "yes, she did condemn him but I can't admit that because I have no objectivity on this issue".


Which I responded to separately. (ie double standards on condemning vs firing).


It is worth noting that you also made up the notion that Red can't admit to having no objectivity on this issue.


The only ones exhibiting no objectivity on this issue are the ones denying there's hypocrisy in action.
 
Redress said:
Same reason people look at car wrecks.
Click to expand...

Because they are classless, dim-witted twits that would rather see destruction than help build anything?

Yeah, that's pretty much my take on a few people around here...
 
jallman said:
Why are you watching her tweets if you dislike her so much? Does she even tweet or are you just frothing at the mouth again like you did yesterday?
Click to expand...

Of course she tweets. She does everything but, scream from her igloo. Anything to get people to look at her. I didn't say "I" watch her tweets. I assumed you did. Most of her loyal subjects follow her every move.
 
jallman said:
Well as much as you like to shovel it off on us, one would hope you like the bull**** you sputter around in so much.
Click to expand...


Get out of the basement mud. It doesn't belong up here.
 
jallman said:
Because they are classless, dim-witted twits that would rather see destruction than help build anything?

Yeah, that's pretty much my take on a few people around here...
Click to expand...


Cut it out. Palin is a newsmaker, and commenting on the news she makes is totally in bounds.



Palin is a ****ing walking disaster. Not to mention a major political figure, and a highly popular pundit. What she says WILL be noticed.
 
jackalope said:
Not at all, Jallman.

It's cuz yer girl is a hypocritical whiny thing and Red got it exactly right.
Click to expand...

OK, you little cybersisters can stick together and keep patting each other on the back for being shallow and dim in your lack of objectivity. You can cry and bitch and moan about every little thing Palin says and you can be as catty and irrelevant as you want to be.

I am just so enlightened at how the tabloid effect is the preference over reason when certain once of you encourage each other to crank up the stupid.

But do enjoy yourselves. I've nothing else left to say at this point because it's a waste of breath attempting to have a rational, issue based discussion with either of you.

Good day.

*now cue up Redress's usual smarmy invention of some reason why I bowed out. :roll:
 
ADK_Forever said:
Of course she tweets. She does everything but, scream from her igloo. Anything to get people to look at her. I didn't say "I" watch her tweets. I assumed you did. Most of her loyal subjects follow her every move.
Click to expand...



*snicker* at scream from her igloo ....


Does she tweet by the way? She must. I know she facebooks. Her facebook posts make big news quite often.
 
jallman said:
OK, you little cybersisters can stick together and keep patting each other on the back for being shallow and dim in your lack of objectivity. You can cry and bitch and moan about every little thing Palin says and you can be as catty and irrelevant as you want to be.

I am just so enlightened at how the tabloid effect is the preference over reason when certain once of you encourage each other to crank up the stupid.

But do enjoy yourselves. I've nothing else left to say at this point because it's a waste of breath attempting to have a rational, issue based discussion with either of you.

Good day.

*now cue up Redress's usual smarmy invention of some reason why I bowed out. :roll:
Click to expand...


The namecalling is lame, and adds to my conviction that you don't have a good argument to make in this thread.
 
ADK_Forever said:
Of course she tweets. She does everything but, scream from her igloo. Anything to get people to look at her. I didn't say "I" watch her tweets. I assumed you did. Most of her loyal subjects follow her every move.
Click to expand...

Here again, you make it an issue of whether I have some loyalty or not. You can't argue the point, you have to argue the person. Because you have no point.

And I love the ignorant, asinine igloo comments. It says volumes more about the maker of that comment than it does about Palin.
 
jallman said:
OK, you little cybersisters can stick together and keep patting each other on the back for being shallow and dim in your lack of objectivity. You can cry and bitch and moan about every little thing Palin says and you can be as catty and irrelevant as you want to be.

I am just so enlightened at how the tabloid effect is the preference over reason when certain once of you encourage each other to crank up the stupid.

But do enjoy yourselves. I've nothing else left to say at this point because it's a waste of breath attempting to have a rational, issue based discussion with either of you.

Good day.

*now cue up Redress's usual smarmy invention of some reason why I bowed out. :roll:
Click to expand...

Would you like a kleenex for those tears?
 
MyOwnDrum said:
Sorry Hatuey, but this IS in poor taste to post this photo of this little boy. Really not necessary...
Click to expand...

Mocking little retarded kids. That's how low some people sink. Not like I haven't seen it before though.
 
misterman said:
Mocking little retarded kids. That's how low some people sink. Not like I haven't seen it before though.
Click to expand...

It's only reflective of the general lowbrow depth most Palin threads sink to as soon as the cyber sisters get going. :shrug:
 
jallman said:
It's only reflective of the general lowbrow depth most Palin threads sink to as soon as the cyber sisters get going. :shrug:
Click to expand...


Hatuey's a cyber sister?


Also, I think Palin threads deteriorate when Palinistas who lack objectivity get personally offended when the object of their adoration is criticized.


GMAFB on that. As IF *any* public figure will escape criticism. Supporters should try to refrain from adding to the whiny aura that sludges after Palin everywhere she goes.
 
jackalope said:
Hatuey's a cyber sister?


Also, I think Palin threads deteriorate when Palinistas who lack objectivity get personally offended when the object of their adoration is criticized.


GMAFB on that. As IF *any* public figure will escape criticism. Supporters should try to refrain from adding to the whiny aura that sludges after Palin everywhere she goes.
Click to expand...
"palinista" i like it.
 
jallman said:
So what? Now we're gonna go hunt down everyone Palin has ever come in contact with, directly (or indirectly if directly doesn't turn anything up) that used the word "retarded", expect her to know about each individual use, and then spend the rest of her days writing condemnations for it or else she's a hypocrite?

That's just stupid and beyond the expectations laid on anyone else. PDS FTW with you people. :roll::roll::roll:
Click to expand...

I think the problem is that Palin heard it from somebody who read it in the WSJ over a WEEK AGO. It is not even that she herself, grabbed the WSJ and said "Oh well this is horrible." No. She heard it from somebody who read about it a week and Palin decided to go on a complain fest about it now.

Obama chief of staff’s 'retarded' insult brings fallout, Palin criticism - Yahoo! News

Palin, whose son Trig is afflicted with Down syndrome, said she was informed of Emanuel's comment by a fellow parent of a special-needs child and pleaded with the president to "show decency" to the political process by "eliminating" the Chicago native from his inner circle.

In a post titled "Are You Capable of Decency, Rahm Emanuel?," Palin wrote, "Just as we’d be appalled if any public figure of Rahm’s stature ever used the 'N-word' or other such inappropriate language, Rahm’s slur on all God’s children with cognitive and developmental disabilities — and the people who love them — is unacceptable," adding, "it's heartbreaking."
Click to expand...

This was done for political reasons. She is just trying to milk her 15 minutes a bit further. Nothing more. Nothing less. I'm not saying that she shouldn't be insulted at the use of the word. I am just saying that the timing and circumstance around her outrage are QUITE suspect.
 
Last edited:
Hatuey said:
I think the problem is that Palin heard it from somebody who read it in the WSJ over a WEEK AGO.
Click to expand...

Do you have anything to back up that assertion?

It is not even that she herself, grabbed the WSJ and said "Oh well this is horrible." No. She heard it from somebody who read about it a week and Palin decided to go on a complain fest about it now.
Click to expand...

Do you have anything to back up that assertion.

Obama chief of staff’s 'retarded' insult brings fallout, Palin criticism - Yahoo! News



This was done for political reasons. Nothing more. Nothing less.
Click to expand...

Do you have anything to back up that assertion?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom