• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Barack Obama’s former mentor criticises ‘complacent Administration’

zimmer

Educating the Ignorant
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 19, 2008
Messages
24,380
Reaction score
7,805
Location
Worldwide
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative
Barack Obama’s former mentor criticises ‘complacent Administration’ - Times Online
US & Americas News
From The Times
February 1, 2010

Barack Obama’s former mentor criticises ‘complacent Administration’

Professor Edley, who worked in the Clinton and Carter Administrations and is now Dean of the Law School at the University of California, Berkeley, added: “I wouldn’t give [Obama] as high a grade as President as I gave him when he was my student. I know he can do better.”

Mr Emanuel’s willingness to let health reforms slide could condemn Mr Obama to “a caretaker presidency”, Paul Krugman, the Nobel prize-winning economist, has warned.
"Caretaker"... he's more like the undertaker.

.
 
Re: Barack Obama’s former mentor criticises ‘complacent Administration’

I agree 100%. Obammer is so busy trying not to step on anyone's toes, that he can't accomplish anything. My wife and I were behind the man all through his campaign. Last week we didn't even watch his State of the Union address.

Political double-talk and promises that I've heard before. He's done nothing. Hell, the bailouts and stimulus were thought up during W's administration.

Nothing.
 
"Caretaker"... he's more like the undertaker.

.
undertaker.jpg
 
I agree 100%. Obammer is so busy trying not to step on anyone's toes, that he can't accomplish anything. My wife and I were behind the man all through his campaign. Last week we didn't even watch his State of the Union address.

Political double-talk and promises that I've heard before. He's done nothing. Hell, the bailouts and stimulus were thought up during W's administration.

Nothing.


Mickey, Mickey.....tsk, tsk.....You and other liberals fell for the hype in the campaign. You fell for the garbage that Obama was the man you'd been waiting for. A blank slate, one that openly said that he was someone that went into it projecting that people could paint on him what ever they wanted to see. And now you complain that he is an empty suit? :lol:

See, you radical libs want him to go further, when it is clear that the majority of the country is screaming STOP!!!! Good Theater though.....:popcorn2:


j-mac
 
Re: Barack Obama’s former mentor criticises ‘complacent Administration’

Mickey, Mickey.....tsk, tsk.....You and other liberals fell for the hype in the campaign. You fell for the garbage that Obama was the man you'd been waiting for. A blank slate, one that openly said that he was someone that went into it projecting that people could paint on him what ever they wanted to see. And now you complain that he is an empty suit? :lol:

See, you radical libs want him to go further, when it is clear that the majority of the country is screaming STOP!!!! Good Theater though.....:popcorn2:


j-mac
The alternative at the time was McSame. What's a constituent to do?
 
The alternative at the time was McSame. What's a constituent to do?


I agree we have poor choices right now. At the heart of this IMHO is 'Progressivism'. It has infiltrated BOTH parties and muddled the message.

We need candidates with clear principles who are not afraid to stand on them.


j-mac
 
I agree we have poor choices right now. At the heart of this IMHO is 'Progressivism'. It has infiltrated BOTH parties and muddled the message.

We need candidates with clear principles who are not afraid to stand on them.


j-mac

About every candidate that runs on Reagan principles wins, a la Scott Brown.

When will Republicans learn that? They're so busy trying not to get attacked by the media that they forget what most voters want.
 
The alternative at the time was McSame. What's a constituent to do?

Look at who is believable.

Look at where they come from; Ayers, Wright, Rezko aren't the type of people I'd want a family member to associate with, so why would I want the President to?

Look for experience. Obama had scant experience.

Look how they got to where they are. Obama was a community organizer/agitator, was brought into Harvard through the back door, won his place in Illinois using hard ball tactics, and was lofted every softball imaginable during 08.

That's a pretty good start, dontcha think?

McSame is a Lib; you would have been better off voting for him, but one year of the Wrecking Ball we have and as a lame duck Democrat Party Wrecker for 3-years might have been the better choice... though it didn't seem like we would be gifted like that last November.

We might have gotten lucky, but at the cost of several trillion for the Grandkids and their Grandkids. They can thank him and his party later.

.
 
Last edited:
I agree 100%. Obammer is so busy trying not to step on anyone's toes, that he can't accomplish anything. My wife and I were behind the man all through his campaign. Last week we didn't even watch his State of the Union address.

Political double-talk and promises that I've heard before. He's done nothing. Hell, the bailouts and stimulus were thought up during W's administration.

Nothing.

Republicans would be happy with nothing. What we don't like is incompetence, nationalizing industries, smash industries in the mouth, being subservient to outside interests, bending to terrorists and spending like a crack whore with a third grade education that won the lottery.

.
 
About every candidate that runs on Reagan principles wins, a la Scott Brown.

When will Republicans learn that? They're so busy trying not to get attacked by the media that they forget what most voters want.

Scott Brown is a pro-gay marriage, pro-choice, socially liberal candidate....What "Reagan Principle" did he run under when Reagan was an homophobic, pro-life, socially conservative Republican? Oh wait...I get it. Scott Brown wants to increase the national debt by 18%?
 
Last edited:
The alternative at the time was McSame. What's a constituent to do?

Vote third party

About every candidate that runs on Reagan principles wins, a la Scott Brown.

When will Republicans learn that? They're so busy trying not to get attacked by the media that they forget what most voters want.

LMAO the same Scott Brown that supported Romneycare! Tell me when did you hit your head?
 
Back
Top Bottom