"God Bless Our Troops in Harms Way."
I refuse to accept the view that mankind is so tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war that the bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood can never become a reality. - MLK
Again if you really believed that Tiller was a baby killing monster then you should be glad that he was taken out regardless of the method used to take him out and applauding the man who stopped the monster. Not sitting there jumping on the abortionist bandwagon trying to score cool points with people who use the term "fetus" to dehumanize and justify killing a baby.I believe Tiller is the scum of the earth but we live by law and we have to abide by it..
If a man stopped someone from killing someone else on the street or who was trying to rape a woman you would call the man a hero for stopping that scumbag. You wouldn't be sitting there saying oh that individual shouldn't have taken the law into his own hands,hes a murderer,he should have waited until the police did something,I hope he gets the death penalty I would volunteer to pull to the switch". But Scott Roeder who has killed a baby killing monster and therefore prevented that baby killing monster from killing more and you want to condemn him and hop on the abortionist band wagon like somehow kissing their asses will not make them think you are nuts for thinking a fetus is a human being/baby.
Do you honestly believe that abortionist are sitting at home thinking "man I was going to be pro-life, but seeing Scott Roeder shoot that late term abortionist just made me change my mind."? A scientist could come out tomorrow and say that fetus has consciences thought as 12 weeks after conception or that a "fetus" at any stage of development can be simply transferred to another womb or cold storage to be transplanted later at a later date and abortionist would still support abortion.......This guy that killed him probably set our movement back 20 years.
If What Tiller was doing was legal then how can he be a murderer in your eyes? Murder is simply nothing more than a legal term. If some how you view what Tiller the Baby killer did no different than someone locked up on death row has done. Then that means you should view every life that Tiller the baby killer has taken no different than the life or lives someone on death row has taken.So Tiller in your eyes should be seen as nothing more than a serial killer who had to be stopped by any means necessary unless you don't really see Tiller's victims the same as any other innocent person on the street. Since you use the term murderer to describe both Tiller and Roeder then Tiller should be nothing more than a mass murderer or serial murderer and therefore not innocent himself.But since the law does not in shape or form care about Tiller's victims you should be cheering the person who threw away his freedom to take out that baby killing monster........They are both muderers in my eyes.....
"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murder is less to fear"
Cicero Marcus Tullius
Your scenario is nothing like this situation though. It would be more like you thought you knew a rapist who was loose, and hunted him down and killed him without notifying the authorities. Tiller was in church for gods sake, he was not harming any one at all. If you go into a church and shoot an usher because he had commited a rape, and might again the next day, then yes, you are a scumbag.If a man stopped someone from killing someone else on the street or who was trying to rape a woman you would call the man a hero for stopping that scumbag. You wouldn't be sitting there saying oh that individual shouldn't have taken the law into his own hands,hes a murderer,he should have waited until the police did something,I hope he gets the death penalty I would volunteer to pull to the switch".
That is incorrect. Our laws allow for just such a thing. Every person in the US has the right to defend themselves against bodily harm. We even have the right to defend others. Now on many occasions when people defend themselves the legitimacy of their defense must be decided by a jury of their peers, but still the right exists.
Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations; entangling alliances with none.