• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[R.I.P.] Howard Zinn, historian who challenged status quo, dies at 87

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
13,406
Reaction score
8,258
Location
Milwaukee, WI
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Howard Zinn, historian who challenged status quo, dies at 87



Howard Zinn, the Boston University historian and political activist who was an early opponent of US involvement in Vietnam and a leading faculty critic of BU president John Silber, died of a heart attack today in Santa Monica, Calif, where he was traveling, his family said. He was 87.

"His writings have changed the consciousness of a generation, and helped open new paths to understanding and its crucial meaning for our lives," Noam Chomsky, the left-wing activist and MIT professor, once wrote of Dr. Zinn. "When action has been called for, one could always be confident that he would be on the front lines, an example and trustworthy guide."

For Dr. Zinn, activism was a natural extension of the revisionist brand of history he taught. Dr. Zinn's best-known book, "A People's History of the United States" (1980), had for its heroes not the Founding Fathers -- many of them slaveholders and deeply attached to the status quo, as Dr. Zinn was quick to point out -- but rather the farmers of Shays' Rebellion and the union organizers of the 1930s.

As he wrote in his autobiography, "You Can't Be Neutral on a Moving Train" (1994), "From the start, my teaching was infused with my own history. I would try to be fair to other points of view, but I wanted more than 'objectivity'; I wanted students to leave my classes not just better informed, but more prepared to relinquish the safety of silence, more prepared to speak up, to act against injustice wherever they saw it. This, of course, was a recipe for trouble."

Certainly, it was a recipe for rancor between Dr. Zinn and Silber. Dr. Zinn twice helped lead faculty votes to oust the BU president, who in turn once accused Dr. Zinn of arson (a charge he quickly retracted) and cited him as a prime example of teachers "who poison the well of academe."

Dr. Zinn was a cochairman of the strike committee when BU professors walked out in 1979. After the strike was settled, he and four colleagues were charged with violating their contract when they refused to cross a picket line of striking secretaries. The charges against "the BU Five" were soon dropped, however.

Dr. Zinn was born in New York City on Aug. 24, 1922, the son of Jewish immigrants, Edward Zinn, a waiter, and Jennie (Rabinowitz) Zinn, a housewife. He attended New York public schools and worked in the Brooklyn Navy Yard before joining the Army Air Force during World War II. Serving as a bombardier in the Eighth Air Force, he won the Air Medal and attained the rank of second lieutenant.

After the war, Dr. Zinn worked at a series of menial jobs until entering New York University as a 27-year-old freshman on the GI Bill. Professor Zinn, who had married Roslyn Shechter in 1944, worked nights in a warehouse loading trucks to support his studies. He received his bachelor's degree from NYU, followed by master's and doctoral degrees in history from Columbia University.

Dr. Zinn was an instructor at Upsala College and lecturer at Brooklyn College before joining the faculty of Spelman College in Atlanta, in 1956. He served at the historically black women's institution as chairman of the history department. Among his students were the novelist Alice Walker, who called him "the best teacher I ever had," and Marian Wright Edelman, future head of the Children's Defense Fund.

During this time, Dr. Zinn became active in the civil rights movement. He served on the executive committee of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, the most aggressive civil rights organization of the time, and participated in numerous demonstrations.

FULL STORY

RIP :(
 
Howard Zinn was a fairly insightful anarchist and socialist commentator. While there's some definite friction with my own perspective there, he was a libertarian-at-heart who challenged imperialistic empire first and foremost. May he rest in peace.
 
I never agreed with his approach or his conclusions, but as a lover of historical research and the spread of historical knowledge, the man deserves respect.
 
Professor Zinn was a formidable friend to radical workers worldwide and a formidable enemy to scabs, fascists and greedheads everywhere. The working people of the United States are forever indebted to him for awakening (some of) them to their own history. Farewell Professor, brother, comrade Zinn.
 
Good riddance.
 
Moderator's Warning:
This is an RIP thread, so let's cut out the bickering.
 
As a student at Boston University it was sad to learn that we lost some one like Zinn. I had heard him speak before and while I did not agree with some of what he said it was a joy listening and talking to him.
 
I liked his People’s History. When I read it in college history, it was the time I was exposed to the idea of applying critical thought to history. Didn’t agree with everything he said, but at least it got me thinking about the topic instead of blindly accepting the rote facts pounded into my skull since elementary school.
 
I liked his People’s History. When I read it in college history, it was the time I was exposed to the idea of applying critical thought to history.

Yeah, the thought was so critical it was spawn by a "history" book without source citations.

Zinn wrote in a clear manner, which I admired, but he desired to produce a work of propaganda. That's not critical thought, but indoctrination.
 
Last edited:
Zinn wrote in a clear manner, which I admired, but he desired to produce a work of propaganda. That's not critical thought, but indoctrination.

First, everyone is biased.

Second, most of it came from primary materials and is easily corroborated.

Third, I don't think calling him a "propagandist" and saying his work is "indoctrination" is valid in an RIP thread.
 
First, everyone is biased.

Second, most of it came from primary materials and is easily corroborated.

Third, I don't think calling him a "propagandist" and saying his work is "indoctrination" is valid in an RIP thread.
"The right-wingers who attacked Howard Zinn's The People Speak can't dispute that the speeches, letters, petitions and songs performed in the film are real. If they are, then why shouldn't people--including young people--hear them?"
--Brian Jones
Might the history channel possibly air the people speak, maybe just once more in the Professor's memory?
 
"The right-wingers who attacked Howard Zinn's The People Speak can't dispute that the speeches, letters, petitions and songs performed in the film are real. If they are, then why shouldn't people--including young people--hear them?"
--Brian Jones
Might the history channel possibly air the people speak, maybe just once more in the Professor's memory?

Not all right wingers attack Zinn. I am one of those who don't. While I feel that his approach was certainly biased towards his political ideology, A Peoples' History of the United States was factual, telling the story of America, not through fables or blue ribbon commissions, but from the lives of everyday people. Not everybody wants to hear that Columbus, who we celebrate a holiday for, is responsible for the complete extermination of the Arawak indians, or that George Washington died of syphilis, but those events happened.

I like to believe that America, like almost every other nation in the world, has its own foibles, but part of our history is how we learned from our mistakes, which is part of what has made us so great. There is no need to whitewash history, but to embrace the good, and know the bad, so that we can ensure that the bad never happens again. As the old adage goes, those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it. And, of course, in order to learn from history, one must know it.

Just my 2 cents on this matter. And yes, like him or not, Zinn was a great man. RIP.
 
Last edited:
The thing I liked about People's History was that it at least sent a message that the main historical narratives don't cover everyone. There's people who lose and who aren't the bad guys. i don't agree with all of it, but it does give you perspective.
 
Could we also cut back on celebrating the death of a good man just a little bit? Sorry, guess that's a partisan stance.

He lied and altered history and brain washed countless students, he was not a good man.
 
Moderator's Warning:
Necro'd thread should have stayed dead. Closing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom