Originally Posted by Blackdog
"Sarah Palinís oldest daughter, Bristol, is seeking child support from Levi Johnston, the father of her 1-year-old son. A court document says she is providing nearly all of the care for the baby, Tripp, and is seeking $1,750 a month. She says Mr. Johnston has paid only $4,400 in more than a year. His lawyer, Rex Butler, says that his client wanted to give money for the babyís care on several occasions, requesting that Ms. Palin bring Tripp with her, but that she was a no-show."
Now please explain what Sarah Palin, has to do with this or anything I said?
Flying of the handle before you have all the details is just so stupid.
YOUR POST IS THE SOURCE OF THAT INFORMATION.
Thanks for playing sir ... but you failed.
What is the big story? He isn't paying what he should according to the law to support his own child--another dead beat dad.
Levi has pulled in "in excess of $105,000 in 2009 through various media interviews and modeling related activities." The $105,000 figure is significant, because under Alaska law a non-custodial parent must pay 20% of income up to $105,000 a year -- which comes to $1,750 a month.
Bristol Palin to Levi Johnston -- Pay Up Deadbeat | TMZ.com
If it was Mrs. Sarah Palin, it would say that. It says Ms. Palin who is the unmarried Bristol, hence the Ms. and not Mrs. Now since Sarah Palin has no custodial rights, why would Levi Johnston, be going after Sarah Palin? Or asking her to visit?
Your argument makes no sense, and is moronic at best.
The only real failure here is me letting you suck me into your patented brand of insanity.
Last edited by Black Dog; 01-23-10 at 07:19 PM.
No Lives Matter
Child support is for the benefit of the child. It has nothing to do with whether the custodial parent is behaving properly in the eyes of the noncustodial parent. If the custodial parent is not complying with a lawful custody order, the noncustodial parent can pursue that in a separate matter.
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
Jerry jerry jerry jerry jerry
THE GREATEST FREEDOM IS THE FREEDOM TO OPPRESS OTHERS
I think this gives Sarah Palin one more real life qualification because many Americans can relate to having problem children who make bad choices.
Obama has always lived in a bubble and it's already obvious he hasn't had to make tough choices in real life or ever really faced any adversity.
I'm more likely to vote for Palin over Obama after learning of this.