It's a little disheartining. Initially, I had full faith in the IPCC. Sure, climatologists are just physics students who flunked out. Yeah, the IPCC obviously has a confirmation bias. But if something about the climate was going to be catergorized and explained; I thought the IPCC would do it.
Of course, I never thought they'd turn to some half-assed scientist's media interview.
So... pull your head out of the sand... or some other place where it's asphyxiating.
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dtbn9zBfJSs"]YouTube- Bjorn Lomborg: Our priorities for saving the world[/ame]
No we don't.It does not change the fact that we have to deal with the disappearance of the glaciers one way or another.
Billions are dependent on glaciers for clean drinking water?Billions of people are dependent on them for their clean drinking water, what to do about that?
That is pure bull****.
First we had the new Ice Age on the way, then Global Warming... when that was being debunked it changed to Climate Change, and their latest charade... Extreme Weather.How about the insane weather patterns we have seen the last few months, setting record after record. Yes that is part of global warming too.
Some people will believe anything... no matter how much evidence is brought forth about fixed models, bad math, and outright scheming to cook the books.
Are you Algore or Ted Danson? The bull**** alarmism and verbal theatrics are nausiating.We should be doing something to possibly slow the decline if we could and at worst have plans in place to deal with the disasters for billions of people that is on the way.
This is typical Europe Sheeple speak. There is no discussion there, and all the airwaves vomit out this propaganda. Fact is... I have never seen a Global Warming contrarian on Euro TV. Why is that?
Last edited by zimmer; 01-23-10 at 04:32 AM.
I AM DEPLORABLE.
NEVER CRIMINAL HILLARY (S-NY)