This isn't a cognitive lapse on my part,
Clearly it was, since you failed to understand the implications.
this is a failure on your part to properly define your position.
My position is perfectly defined.
Right now, I'm sitting, with my knees bent, elbows on desk, typing, with my head turned slightly to the left and looking down at a monitor.
My political positions are also perfectly defined, if you unclearly meant to imply some kind of philsopical stance, not a physical one.
In other words, you can't respond without earning an infraction, which in fact means that both conditions are true at the same time.
Not necessarily.
Pointing out that your assertion that I may be calling you a fool and whatever else it was you said didn't mean the second part was true.
It did't mean the first part was true.
It meant you're not very adept at presenting logical conditionals for public perusal.
The logic traps you create for yourself aren't assigned to me to unravel and correct. My name isn't Samurai Second Grade Teacher-San.
It's good to know that your argument is so weak that even you acknowledge all that is left to you is to sling personal insults.
I haven't slung personal insults, I've bent over backwards encouraging you to examine your logical posturing without actually -ewww- holding your hand to do so.
Okay, so it's vastly entertaining to watch someone like yourself work diligently with that shovel.
Can you explain why you think the hole you're in will get less deep if you persist in digging?
Can you identify the single logical flaw you made that got yourself special attention from your superior, me?