• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trial to Begin in Abortion-Doctor Killing

Oh I comprehend just fine mr snark. What I see is you pulling a tactic that is tired and old.

It's old and tired to object to unfair generalizations?

james used "Libs" as a generalization. You know what that is don't you? If it applies, then take it to heart, if not don't worry about it.

No. It doesn't work that way.

You could justify lots of things with that crazy logic. "Jews suck the blood of children." Hey, if you're a Jew but you don't actually drink child blood, "don't worry about it."

See, it is the larger point of his that you try and derail with your childishness here. Instead of speaking to the characterization, you choose the ultimately failing tactic of making it personal. That looses every time.

But it IS personal.

Why can't james just not make unfair generalizations, huh?
 
Oh I comprehend just fine mr snark. What I see is you pulling a tactic that is tired and old. james used "Libs" as a generalization. You know what that is don't you? If it applies, then take it to heart, if not don't worry about it. See, it is the larger point of his that you try and derail with your childishness here. Instead of speaking to the characterization, you choose the ultimately failing tactic of making it personal. That looses every time.

So, my suggestion is that when you take your next Semester's choices home to talk over with mommy, you should go back and take a little speech, and debate to refresh what you think you know.
:2wave:


j-mac

And your comments still do no negate nor refute any of the comments I have made. As for your mommy comment, it only shows your maturity is less than mature.

He made a false generalization and got called on it, deal with it.
 
Last edited:
His baby total was zero, or he would have been a criminal, unlike his murderer.

Never mind first and second trimeister he killed babies in the 3rd trimeister that were viable outside the womband that at the moment is legal murder.......
 
Never mind first and second trimeister he killed babies in the 3rd trimeister that were viable outside the womband that at the moment is legal murder.......

I refer you to post #330. No babies.
 
I refer you to post #330. No babies.

The scientific community says different...I will take their word for it..

Some day we will meet our maker..........If I am wrong then its no big deal...No life was taken...If your wrong then you advocated killing babies....I like my side better.........
 
The scientific community says different...I will take their word for it..

Some day we will meet our maker..........If I am wrong then its no big deal...No life was taken...If your wrong then you advocated killing babies....I like my side better.........

In this case, what the scientific community says is trumped my the legal community. Legally, he committed no murders.
 
He performed abortions on babies in the3rd trimeister, babies that could live outside the womb...By definition that is legal murder..........

Unless you can show me the legal statute that says that this is murder, it is NOT.
 
In this case, what the scientific community says is trumped my the legal community. Legally, he committed no murders.

Its legal to kill babies in the womb now but with God's help and one more conservative justice on the SCOTUS Roe V Wade will be history and butchers who perform unnecessary abortions will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law....................I just hope I live long enough to see that day my friend.........
 
I believe its called Partial Birth Abortion passed by the snate and upheld by the SCOTUS..............

If it is legally termed murder then I will retract, but I'm pretty sure it is not. Therefore, legally, it cannot be called murder.
 
Last edited:

From the above link:

Any physician who, in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, knowingly performs a partial-birth abortion and thereby kills a human fetus shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both. This subsection does not apply to a partial-birth abortion that is necessary to save the life of a mother whose life is endangered by a physical disorder, physical illness, or physical injury, including a life-endangering physical condition caused by or arising from the pregnancy itself. This subsection takes effect 1 day after the date of enactment of this chapter.

Not murder. Tiller was not a murderer under legal terms.
 
Last edited:
If it is legally termed murder then I will retract, but I'm pretty sure it is not. Therefore, legally, it cannot be called murder.

Because of a very liberal SCOTUS in 1973 it is legal in accordance with Roe V Wade......that does not make it right though....
 
Its legal to kill babies in the womb now but with God's help and one more conservative justice on the SCOTUS Roe V Wade will be history and butchers who perform unnecessary abortions will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law....................I just hope I live long enough to see that day my friend.........

Than GOD that the election of Obama prevented the likelihood that THAT will ever happen. One thing you will live long enough to see though Navy...is gay Marriage. I know you hate it....but its coming your way...very soon!
 
Because of a very liberal SCOTUS in 1973 it is legal in accordance with Roe V Wade......that does not make it right though....

But it's legal and therefore is NOT murder.
 
Than GOD that the election of Obama prevented the likelihood that THAT will ever happen. One thing you will live long enough to see though Navy...is gay Marriage. I know you hate it....but its coming your way...very soon!

You mean that one term president who will lose one judge to ovarian cancer next year and Douglas will be 90 and retire and then butchering in the womb will stop........As far as gay marriage goes, I don't even worry about that, you are losing every day on that one......The people have spoke DD.....Live with it.......
 
Back
Top Bottom