- Joined
- Jun 11, 2009
- Messages
- 19,657
- Reaction score
- 8,454
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
I think it's because CC is a LCSW or LPC and feels he is more qualified to make conclusions on these topics than any of us. My ex is an LPC, so I understand the thinking. The trouble is they become consumed by their methods and philosophies. That doesn't mean they're wrong, but it does mean they are predictable. Whenever CC discusses these sorts of things, he sounds the same. And I've heard it all before after 25 years with the same women. The central premise to this profession is that because they study and treat the mind, they can judge your thoughts with unimpuned authority because the mind is the key to reality and therefore all of man's actions. The problems is that they are also human with flawed human minds. Furthermore the brain and the mind is so complex, that their profession (i.e., knowledge and methods) are probably the more imperfect of any. I fully expect a rebuttal, but it will be irrelevant.
For **** sake!
I give up. Many of the people here don't even have the basic intellectual capability to understand the difference between a cited and referenced journal and an unreferenced piece of political propaganda. I mean if this is really the level of intelligence of people who are opposed to same sex marriage, then I guess I have wasted my time debating this issue.