- Joined
- Jan 10, 2009
- Messages
- 42,744
- Reaction score
- 22,569
- Location
- Bonners Ferry ID USA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
No, you have not show that. I have no idea why you think you have. I understand definitions, and don't dispute those definitions, but the fact remains, what is proposed is a 2.5% tax on those who don't comply. So, you "reasoning" aside, the fact is still the fact.
And I see nothing that can't be complied with, and you have not presented anything real that is proposed that can't be.
Fact is that the politicians are calling it a tax. That is a lie. As we have been trying to show you. It is a fine. You can call a duck a swan but that doesn't mean that the duck IS a swan.