• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

DC City Council votes to legalize gay marriage

texmaster said:
Ah another person laughably trying to relate race to homosexuality.

Sad. Utterly sad.
Click to expand...

What's really sad is that people like you don't see the ugliness and ignorance of your statements. The world is changing, we have a better understanding of sexual orientation and therefore a broader acceptance that it is more than a "lifestyle choice". Being black, left-handed, blue-eyed, and/or homosexual are all choices made before we are born.

Filled with fear and hate you trudge along, grasping for anything to justify something that is wrong.
 
Charles Martel,

Since you continually take things out of context and only cherry pick what you want to hear you are no longer worth debating. Those kinds of moves clearly indicate a closed mind that is here in this thread more to promote a percieved agenda than to actually discuss and debate things.

Bye. :2wave:
 
apdst said:
If Libbos couldn't scream, "racist", or, "homophobe", they wouldn't have an argument.
Click to expand...

If you could not cry about "Libbos" and make **** up about them you would have no arguments.
 
hazlnut said:
What's really sad is that people like you don't see the ugliness and ignorance of your statements. The world is changing, we have a better understanding of sexual orientation and therefore a broader acceptance that it is more than a "lifestyle choice". Being black, left-handed, blue-eyed, and/or homosexual are all choices made before we are born.

Filled with fear and hate you trudge along, grasping for anything to justify something that is wrong.
Click to expand...

So homosexuality is genetic?
 
Redress said:
If you could not cry about "Libbos" and make **** up about them you would have no arguments.
Click to expand...

What have I made up?

And, what fun would it be if we all agreed on everything?...:rofl
 
apdst said:
What have I made up?

And, what fun would it be if we all agreed on everything?...:rofl
Click to expand...

Well, let's see...No argument except crying racist or homophobe? Two arguments that I and alot of us avoid altogether(well, I think I toyed with a weak version of homophobe, but not for long). You are, as usual, making crap up and trying to attribute it to those you disagree with.

What fun would it be if we actually debated ideas instead of using mindless namecalling? I think alot.
 
EpicDude86 said:
So homosexuality is genetic?
Click to expand...

Did he use the word genetic? He said "before we are born", which is possible but not proven. Certainly very early in life at the least, possibly at conception, possibly prenatal, possibly very early in development.
 
I am curious as to why any government is in the marriage business at all?

Would it not make everyone happy if the government only recognized civil unions and the churches handled marriages?
 
Redress said:
Well, let's see...No argument except crying racist or homophobe? Two arguments that I and alot of us avoid altogether(well, I think I toyed with a weak version of homophobe, but not for long). You are, as usual, making crap up and trying to attribute it to those you disagree with.
Click to expand...



Nothing made up there! You even admit it's not made up...:rofl

What fun would it be if we actually debated ideas instead of using mindless namecalling? I think alot.
Click to expand...

You should look in the mirror and ask yourself that question. Repetively, if necessary.
 
Redress said:
Did he use the word genetic? He said "before we are born", which is possible but not proven. Certainly very early in life at the least, possibly at conception, possibly prenatal, possibly very early in development.
Click to expand...

Touche, but he referenced race, left handedness, and eye color.
 
apdst said:
Nothing made up there! You even admit it's not made up...:rofl
Click to expand...

No, I did not. Go have fun finding out how many times I called some one a racist or homophobe on this board. You will notice a distinct lack, and yet I argue positions here pretty much daily. You are wrong, and your arguments tend to be nothing more than blanket misrepresentations of those ebil "libbos".

You should look in the mirror and ask yourself that question. Repetively, if necessary.
Click to expand...

I have been arguing positions in this thread in dozens of posts. You, not once.
 
EpicDude86 said:
Touche, but he referenced race, left handedness, and eye color.
Click to expand...

Which are all examples of things determined before birth. he used the phrase "before birth", not "genetic". You chose to read into it.
 
Redress said:
No, I did not. Go have fun finding out how many times I called some one a racist or homophobe on this board. You will notice a distinct lack, and yet I argue positions here pretty much daily. You are wrong, and your arguments tend to be nothing more than blanket misrepresentations of those ebil "libbos".
Click to expand...

Just going on what you said.

Well, let's see...No argument except crying racist or homophobe? Two arguments that I and alot of us avoid altogether(well, I think I toyed with a weak version of homophobe, but not for long). You are, as usual, making crap up and trying to attribute it to those you disagree with.
Click to expand...



Maybe you need to learn to write?
 
apdst said:
Just going on what you said.





Maybe you need to learn to write?
Click to expand...

Ok, this is complicated, so I will go slow with it. See, in one case, you say "libbos" only use 2 arguments, homophobe and racist. Now I admit that I have used the homophobe argument but not often, and I stopped using it. I also point out I have made tons of arguments without using either, in fact, it would be about 99.99 % of my arguments, and 100 % more recently. Now, what that means is your statement that "libbos" only use two arguments is wrong. In fact, it is not even close to right. I would go so far as to say it's not even remotely close to anything resembling truth. Did that go over your head, or do you now follow the difference between "only" and "rarely"?
 
Redress said:
Ok, this is complicated, so I will go slow with it. See, in one case, you say "libbos" only use 2 arguments, homophobe and racist. Now I admit that I have used the homophobe argument but not often, and I stopped using it. I also point out I have made tons of arguments without using either, in fact, it would be about 99.99 % of my arguments, and 100 % more recently. Now, what that means is your statement that "libbos" only use two arguments is wrong. In fact, it is not even close to right. I would go so far as to say it's not even remotely close to anything resembling truth. Did that go over your head, or do you now follow the difference between "only" and "rarely"?
Click to expand...

There are a total 8 posts with you using the word homophobe on this forum. Of those 8 - only a single one is in reference to a specific person. That is 1 post out of a total of 186 on threads with the word 'gay' in it. Yeah. You average less then 1%. :p
 
Hatuey said:
There are a total 8 posts with you using the word homophobe on this forum. Of those 8 - only a single one is in reference to a specific person. That is 1 post out of a total of 186 on threads with the word 'gay' in it. Yeah. You average less then 1%. :p
Click to expand...

But but but...that is one of my only 2 arguments. It must be true cuz apdst told me so....
 
Redress said:
Which are all examples of things determined before birth. he used the phrase "before birth", not "genetic". You chose to read into it.
Click to expand...


How foolish of me to read into someone's post and ask a question to clarify.
 
I'm still trying to figure out how my response to hazlnut's post suddenly became about Redress. Self centered, much?
 
Redress said:
Go have fun finding out how many times I called some one a racist or homophobe on this board.
Click to expand...

It was not fun to skim through the almost 250 posts by you including the words Racist or Homophobe. But I did it...and you are, as far as this one sees, true in your statement.

Redress said:
Now I admit that I have used the homophobe argument but not often
Click to expand...

Admits, but recants. Legitimate.

Redress said:
(well, I think I toyed with a weak version of homophobe, but not for long)
Click to expand...

Admits, but only that it was a short stint...

Redress said:
It certainly sounds racist
Click to expand...

Close but no cigar here...

Redress said:
I voted for Sharpton and Rush, so I definitely think he is a racist.
Click to expand...

This one I think was sarcasm, but I guess taken out of context you did call someone a racist. :lol:

Redress said:
Butters, sir, to label a whole state as racist is, to my mind, kinda lame.
Click to expand...

Anti-Racist-calling here too...
 
Sucks to be outted like that.
 
apdst said:
If Libbos couldn't scream, "racist", or, "homophobe", they wouldn't have an argument.
Click to expand...

Now after going through Redresses posts how about you go through mine and see how often I have screamed these.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom