- Joined
- May 19, 2006
- Messages
- 156,720
- Reaction score
- 53,497
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Yes yes. Your high levels of smartness. You've prosthelytized this theory often as well.
No, as usual I state facts. Not my fault if you choose not to accept them.
LOL Wow is your logic bad. You can learn to use both yet you use this to claim that homosexuality is a heriditary trait.
Yet you admit you can learn to use the opposite hand.
*shaeks head* Its sad to see you can't understand when your argument has exposed as a fraud.
By your logic, a homosexual could learn to be bisexual but still be homosexual.
Its that kind of failed logic that dooms you each and every time.
Putting aside the fact you can't even prove the two instances are related in any way with a shred of factual data
Like I said, another one who does not understand the conceptual difference between orientation and behavior. Let me spell out the analogy so you MIGHT get it. If someone is oriented to being right handed, and therefore behaves right handed, they can certainly learn to behave left handed, but that does not change that they will be oriented to being right handed, still.
Do you get it now? Or must I explain it for the 7th time? Or perhaps you don't WANT to understand it because it destroys your argument.
You're right. We only have the sexual attraction, compatable sexual organs and procreation on our side where you have a "hunch" :rofl
Appeal to nature logical fallacy...as usual from you. Fail. Again.
Give it up CC.
You have no evidence, only theories. You can't come to grips with the fact it is you who want to change the law based on a theory not factual evidence.
No, give it up, textmaster. You have no facts and your logic is completely faulty. All you have are opinions and logical fallacies.