• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

DC City Council votes to legalize gay marriage

Yes yes. Your high levels of smartness. You've prosthelytized this theory often as well.

No, as usual I state facts. Not my fault if you choose not to accept them.



LOL Wow is your logic bad. You can learn to use both yet you use this to claim that homosexuality is a heriditary trait.

Yet you admit you can learn to use the opposite hand.

*shaeks head* Its sad to see you can't understand when your argument has exposed as a fraud.

By your logic, a homosexual could learn to be bisexual but still be homosexual.

Its that kind of failed logic that dooms you each and every time.

Putting aside the fact you can't even prove the two instances are related in any way with a shred of factual data

Like I said, another one who does not understand the conceptual difference between orientation and behavior. Let me spell out the analogy so you MIGHT get it. If someone is oriented to being right handed, and therefore behaves right handed, they can certainly learn to behave left handed, but that does not change that they will be oriented to being right handed, still.

Do you get it now? Or must I explain it for the 7th time? Or perhaps you don't WANT to understand it because it destroys your argument.



You're right. We only have the sexual attraction, compatable sexual organs and procreation on our side where you have a "hunch" :rofl

Appeal to nature logical fallacy...as usual from you. Fail. Again.

Give it up CC.

You have no evidence, only theories. You can't come to grips with the fact it is you who want to change the law based on a theory not factual evidence.

No, give it up, textmaster. You have no facts and your logic is completely faulty. All you have are opinions and logical fallacies.
 
I know, right? We got a Charlie, a hamster, a guy in superhero tights. All we need now is a roll of duct tape and a can of Crisco and we got ourselves a party.

images


images



You were saying...
 
LOL Wow is your logic bad. You can learn to use both yet you use this to claim that homosexuality is a heriditary trait.

Yet you admit you can learn to use the opposite hand.

*shaeks head* Its sad to see you can't understand when your argument has exposed as a fraud.

By your logic, a homosexual could learn to be bisexual but still be homosexual.

Its that kind of failed logic that dooms you each and every time.

Putting aside the fact you can't even prove the two instances are related in any way with a shred of factual data

You reveal that you still lack to understand what is being said and quite clearly. Right handedness is associated with control from the left side of the brain, and so even if you learn to use your left hand equally well(which has some real effects by the way), you will still be hard wired to be right handed. Some one with a homosexual orientation can engage in heterosexual sex(an act, not an orientation), and still have a homosexual orientation.



You're right. We only have the sexual attraction, compatable sexual organs and procreation on our side where you have a "hunch" :rofl

Give it up CC.

You have no evidence, only theories. You can't come to grips with the fact it is you who want to change the law based on a theory not factual evidence.

Oh and one more thing.

Folks who use their right hand all their life doesn't all of a sudden become left handed. LOL

You again complain about a lack of evidence, when presenting none. Start supporting your claims with, I dunno, sources maybe?
 
You reveal that you still lack to understand what is being said and quite clearly. Right handedness is associated with control from the left side of the brain, and so even if you learn to use your left hand equally well(which has some real effects by the way), you will still be hard wired to be right handed. Some one with a homosexual orientation can engage in heterosexual sex(an act, not an orientation), and still have a homosexual orientation.

Still can't admit you have no factual basis can you relating right or left hand to homosexuality.

Sad really.

Look up the definition of theory and you will find your entire argument on this.

You again complain about a lack of evidence, when presenting none. Start supporting your claims with, I dunno, sources maybe?

Still lying about this I see. Never mind the fact I used your own article, quoted it as evidence disputing your claim.
 
You reveal that you still lack to understand what is being said and quite clearly. Right handedness is associated with control from the left side of the brain, and so even if you learn to use your left hand equally well(which has some real effects by the way), you will still be hard wired to be right handed. Some one with a homosexual orientation can engage in heterosexual sex(an act, not an orientation), and still have a homosexual orientation.

This has been explained to these folks several times in this thread. Their refusal to acknowledge this is, IMO, deliberate because it destroys their argument. From here on, since they are trolling with their refusal to accept logic, I propose that we dismiss any of their erroneous claims in this matter by stating the following:

"By logic, you have already been proven wrong on this. Your refusal to admit that reduces your argument to zilch and destroys your credibility. Move on." Feel free to copy and paste this. Oh...and anyone who uses this to attempt to support their lack of logic in a mocking way will be seen as trolling and may get infracted. Consider that an official warning.
 
No, as usual I state facts. Not my fault if you choose not to accept them.

I don't accept your theories as facts sorry.

Like I said, another one who does not understand the conceptual difference between orientation and behavior. Let me spell out the analogy so you MIGHT get it. If someone is oriented to being right handed, and therefore behaves right handed, they can certainly learn to behave left handed, but that does not change that they will be oriented to being right handed, still.

And still can't prove homosexual orientation is something you are born with.

The more you spew this theory without factual backing, the more foolish you look.

Do you get it now? Or must I explain it for the 7th time? Or perhaps you don't WANT to understand it because it destroys your argument.

You can explain your theories all you like. Until you can support them with actual factual backing you will have to live with the fact you have theories, not evidence.

Appeal to nature logical fallacy...as usual from you. Fail. Again.



No, give it up, texmaster. You have no facts and your logic is completely faulty. All you have are opinions and logical fallacies.

Right. Let's throw out procreation and sexual compatibility between the sexes and only rely on your theories for basing a new law.

Your arrogance and ignorance on this subject is amazing.
 
You are an idiot. You aren't even being coherent at this point.
Does anyone else know what this jackass moron is talking about?
Yes, your ability to form a coherent argument is unsurpassed by all the other retards.
you tell me, Chuckles.
called out for your mind-numbing stupidity
You do realize that the quiet whispers back and forth now are how the hell you got so ****ed in the head
called out for your mind-numbing stupidity
Anyone else get the impression that jallman had a bit too much coffee this morning?

nervous_dogs.gif
 
You're right. We only have the sexual attraction, compatible sexual organs and procreation on our side where you have a "hunch" :rofl

I dunno I can think of other orifices that are compatible for a phallus, and heck, that phallus can even be a banana if one wanted, it is ideally created and shaped for the purpose, even has 3 ridges to fit the grasping hand perfectly!

Since bananas are compatible for sexual use, this is perfectly natural as well.

Not only is your argument a fallacy, but it falls on its face when applied to that you want to discredit by it.
 
Last edited:
Still can't admit you have no factual basis can you relating right or left hand to homosexuality.

Sad really.

Look up the definition of theory and you will find your entire argument on this.



Still lying about this I see. Never mind the fact I used your own article, quoted it as evidence disputing your claim.

It's an illustration, it's not exact.

That is because I gave evidence, something you have gone out of your way to do. When you get around to presenting sourced evidence, get back to me, till then nothing you have said has any factual bearing.
 
I dunno I can think of other orifices that are compatible for a phallus, and heck, that phallus can even be a banana if one wanted, it is ideally created and shaped for the purpose, even has 3 ridges to fit the grasping hand perfectly!

Since bananas are compatible for sexual use, this is perfectly natural as well.

Not only is your argument is a fallacy, but it falls on its face when applied to that you want to discredit by it.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YfucpGCm5hY"]YouTube- Origin of species - Science Fail[/ame]
 
Mean while back in the real world this item that the DC City Council voted on will not pass Federal or State Rules. See my past post to understand why. :2wave:

Now I return you to the Redress/Texmaster/CC gay threesome :mrgreen::rofl
 
I don't accept your theories as facts sorry.

It is irrelevant as to whether your choose to believe facts or not. It does not affect me in any way.



And still can't prove homosexual orientation is something you are born with.

The more you spew this theory without factual backing, the more foolish you look.

Guess what? I never claimed that you are born with ANY sexual orientation. Research shows that one's sexual orientation, gay OR straight is created by a one, some, or a combination of the following factors: biology; heredity; hormonal/chemical/genetic structure; social constructs. What the actual make up IS, is unknown, but these are the components that are possible.



You can explain your theories all you like. Until you can support them with actual factual backing you will have to live with the fact you have theories, not evidence.

Since the creation of ANY sexual orientation is just theory, you have zero facts for your position...as I have shown by exposing your logical fallacies time and time again.



Right. Let's throw out procreation and sexual compatibility between the sexes and only rely on your theories for basing a new law.

All irrelevant and again, as usual, appeal to nature logical fallacy. I know it is hard to give up on something that you've used time and again, but since it makes your position look absolutely silly you might want to consider the possibility of not using it.

Your arrogance and ignorance on this subject is amazing.

Arrogance and confidence in my accurate knowledge. The only ignorance on this subject, here, I see comes from you and Charles.
 
Anyone else get the impression that jallman had a bit too much coffee this morning?

nervous_dogs.gif

Moderator's Warning:
Unnecessary picture trolling. Please do not do this again.
 
I figured someone would pick up on my allusion to that gobbledygook :2razz:

It's one of my all time favorite videos, and the gay overtones are hilarious.
 
I don't understand your explanation of the difference between orientation and act.


From Merriam-Webster, I hope that's not too gay for you CC:


From the APA:
Sexual orientation is a pattern of emotional, romantic and/or sexual attractions towards men, women, or both, and refers to a person's personal and social identity based on those components.

Sexual behavior are actions that are sexual in nature.

As you can see, these two definitions CAN BE mutually exclusive.
 
Mean while back in the real world this item that the DC City Council voted on will not pass Federal or State Rules. See my past post to understand why. :2wave:

Now I return you to the Redress/Texmaster/CC gay threesome :mrgreen::rofl

No payoff in a threesome debate with two unics.

Not enough KY in the world to help that situation.

I'm out :rofl
 
It's one of my all time favorite videos, and the gay overtones are hilarious.

Heh, I was about to post it when I saw yours. I'd post the response, "God's Pineapple", but those aren't really suitable for insertion anywhere.
 
Heh, I was about to post it when I saw yours. I'd post the response, "God's Pineapple", but those aren't really suitable for insertion anywhere.

Ok, I laughed hard at that, and winced. Well played!
 

I've asked you twice now for an answer to my question. All I want is a direct answer.

Not more mumbo jumbo.

Now before I write you off as having about as much knowledge on this issue as a rock....What is the difference between Sexual Orientation and Sexual Behavior.

Last chance.
 
I've asked you twice now for an answer to my question. All I want is a direct answer.

Not more mumbo jumbo.

Now before I write you off as having about as much knowledge on this issue as a rock....What is the difference between Sexual Orientation and Sexual Behavior.

Last chance.
Sexual Orientation is the person your mind is attracted to and wants to have sex with.

Sexual Behavior is the person you actually have sex with.

Little oversimplified.
 
I've asked you twice now for an answer to my question. All I want is a direct answer.

Not more mumbo jumbo.

Now before I write you off as having about as much knowledge on this issue as a rock....What is the difference between Sexual Orientation and Sexual Behavior.

Last chance.

From the APA:
Sexual orientation is a pattern of emotional, romantic and/or sexual attractions towards men, women, or both, and refers to a person's personal and social identity based on those components.

Sexual behavior are actions that are sexual in nature.

As you can see, these two definitions CAN BE mutually exclusive.

Right there for you to see.
 
Right there for you to see.

I don't think he was asking me. I think he was asking those who either demonstrated that they do not understand the difference, or those who refuse to answer because it destroys their position...textmaster and Charles.
 
I know, right? We got a Charlie, a hamster, a guy in superhero tights. All we need now is a roll of duct tape and a can of Crisco and we got ourselves a party.

STOP MAKING FUN OF MY TIGHTS!!! They're comfy. :mrgreen:
 
I don't think he was asking me. I think he was asking those who either demonstrated that they do not understand the difference, or those who refuse to answer because it destroys their position...textmaster and Charles.

Could be, would not be the first time I have mistook a question.
 
Back
Top Bottom