• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

DC City Council votes to legalize gay marriage

MyPvPRaidHealzAreDa'forizzle-dizzle said:
No, I didn't know what you were talking about at first. You seem to have a fixation on all things ghey that even I don't have. I just put it back there for you once you made a point of telling me what it was you were missing.

And jackass, if you think that avatar had anything to do with the debate...you might want to consider keeping up.

The comedy just keeps on coming from you.
Click to expand...

I like the mistletoe on the chest, indicating something below needs to be kissed ;)
 
Last edited:
CanSomeoneHelpMeLevel? said:
If I've given no evidence I know the differences....why would you be asking again. This isn't the issue, I've spelled the issue out clearly and plainly and proven my opponents wrong on this thread. I'm sorry if that's not to your liking. I really don't care that's it's not to your liking but I'm sorry anyway, you seem upset. So, I'm sorry.
Click to expand...

He's trying to get you to research it and come back with your own answer as an exorcise.
 
Jerry said:
:rofl I got no cumback for that :lol:
Click to expand...

applause.gif
 
jallman said:
No, I didn't know what you were talking about at first. You seem to have a fixation on all things ghey that even I don't have. I just put it back there for you once you made a point of telling me what it was you were missing.
Click to expand...

No, you didn't know what I was talking about, even though I raised the issue just yesterday. And let me get this straight..no pun intended....you think I have this fixation.....given the Santa pic you use?:rofl

And jackass, if you think that avatar had anything to do with the debate...you might want to consider keeping up.
Click to expand...

I didn't think it had anything to do with the debate, I explained in detail I thought it gave a wrong perspective on Christmas...even gave the Bad Santa movie as an analogy. So, I am keeping up even though you aren't.:cool:

The comedy just keeps on coming from you.
Click to expand...

You've this Santa pic.....couldn't even remember I was speaking about it from just yesterday.....put it back on when I thanked you for it disappearing....and the comedy keeps coming from me?

THis is such a classic case of projection, it is your argument that is chock full of comedy and error. But, I'm enjoying it, shooting down arguments without foundation one of my specialties. Have a great day.
 
jallman said:
For a cartoon, it does kinda make my yule log twitch.
Click to expand...

Again, cartoons and pictures result in certain behaviors, but it's all they are.....behaviors. It's interesting you can prove my arguments correct.
 
Jerry said:
I already knew you knew that :2wave:
Click to expand...

Guess you were just reminding Jallman how much you liked it then. The rest of us already knew.

A sheep in wolf's clothing not hard to spot. Not for a trained professional.
 
Charles Martel said:
No, you didn't know what I was talking about, even though I raised the issue just yesterday. And let me get this straight..no pun intended....you think I have this fixation.....given the Santa pic you use?:rofl
Click to expand...

Well you are the one who remembered it and brought it up despite it having not been a point of conversation up until that point so you tell me, Chuckles.

I didn't think it had anything to do with the debate, I explained in detail I thought it gave a wrong perspective on Christmas...even gave the Bad Santa movie as an analogy. So, I am keeping up even though you aren't.:cool:
Click to expand...

You did all that after the fact. It wasn't part of anything until you decided to fixate on it after being called out for your mind-numbing stupidity.

You've this Santa pic.....couldn't even remember I was speaking about it from just yesterday.....put it back on when I thanked you for it disappearing....and the comedy keeps coming from me?
Click to expand...

Yeah that's what I said, isn't it? Reading is FUNdamental.

THis is such a classic case of projection,
Click to expand...

You wanna talk about projection? A clear case of projection is someone who runs around telling others what their sexual orientation is, using some half baked reasoning that because their semen went from a turkey baster to a lesbian's cooter, that suddenly he isn't gay anymore.

You do realize that the quiet whispers back and forth now are how the hell you got so ****ed in the head that you needed to do those kinds of mental somersaults about another person in an effort to secure your own perceptions about yourself?

Do you realize how much of a laughing stock you are to almost everyone in this thread?

it is your argument that is chock full of comedy and error. But, I'm enjoying it, shooting down arguments without foundation one of my specialties. Have a great day.
Click to expand...

You better find a new hobby because you suck at this one. You haven't shot down crap except your own credibility.

But keep with the "I know you are but what am I" responses. The hilarity of it all is a delightful way to laugh away the afternoon.
 
Charles Martel said:
I see you calling it nonsense, you haven't addressed my argument.
Click to expand...

You have made no argument that is not either nonsense or that is unsubstantiated. Make one and I'll address it...if you can...which I doubt.



Your colossal misunderstanding once again exposed, you're now making analogies of child conception to being left handed. You're in fact so wrong here, you're blinded by your own error. It's that huge.
Click to expand...

And again you demonstrate your inability to understand this issue by failing to recognize a simple analogy. I'm sure sucks being wrong. Just man up and admit it.



Oh...yes they are. Any behavior whether sexual, predatory, unethical, normal, abnormal, or circus like pales in comparison to the behavior engaged upon when the child was conceived. No person or persons you'll ever be with will ever be as critical, as important, as real. You are now the parent of a child. Either a mother or a child. That is your primary responsibility now, that human being is now YOUR child. Conceived in the ultimate heterosexual behavior, there is NOTHING....I repeat so you can understand your colossal error, Captain.....NOTHING remotely close to homosexual can reproduce, it cannot procreate, it is selfish pleasure, it is behavior, is isn't human sexuality. If you cannot see this clearly, I cannot help you to understand. It's right there in front of your mirror each morning, your denial of the truth and reality quite obvious.
Click to expand...

As usual, you are completely wrong. Nothing here but mindless opinion. But please, show some substantiation for your position...if you can...which you can't.



Every member arguing here. Every single person you know. Every single person you've EVER known....was produced from heterosexual behavior.....sorry, it's a fact. If you know someone who was born of artificial insemination, then it's artificial...the human body is clearly designed for heterosexual behavior, the human orgasm...including the woman's...primary purpose is procreation...not your behavioral pleasures. And when I say "you" here Captain, I am not speaking AT you. I am making a manking argument, I would hope that clear. I'm enjoying the banter-filled debate, not trying to start a fight.
Click to expand...

I quoted the key word...which you continue to fail to understand. Heterosexual behavior, yes. Heterosexual orientation, NO. This is why you are wrong, continue to be wrong, and WILL continue to be wrong. You do not understand the difference between sexual behavior and sexual orientation.



Your actual beliefs here are the problem, Captain. You're so wrong...you are compounding colossal error after misunderstanding after having no idea. Let's agree to disagree.
Click to expand...

No, the problem is that not only are your beliefs nothing more than opinion, with no facts within several light years of them, but they are absolutely based on a complete misunderstanding of the concepts being discussed. I do not believe anyone in history has been as wrong as you. Please tell us all how that feels.

And...the smoke over that horizon there is the remains of your argument after having being shot down in flames like a world war one Spad. I pray you can be more successful with someone else less educated on this matter. I have yet to hear a coherent argument from you, let's move on, shall we?
Click to expand...

So, as your arguments sits smoldering in the fertilizer that it is, I do hope that you have been educated on this. I know that you came into this discussion with zero knowledge on the issue, and your inability to listen to facts seems like a major detriment to your ability to gain some understanding. But don't worry. I will continue to correct your posts each and every time you err. And considering that each and every post of yours is an error, I have my work cut out for me.
 
Last edited:
Charles Martel said:
It's a free country Kal, you're free to be as wrong as anyone.:2razz:



The differences here between orientation and behavior aren't the issue. My argument here is you are designed to procreate. Everyone knows this. It is so obvious, it isn;t an argument. Our human sexuality...isn't limited to behavior...in fact, behavior is but a fraction of our human sexuality. THe greater protion of our human sexuality....that is primary and precedence over behavior..occurs after the orgasm. Conception, pregnancy, child birth...it is ALL very much our human sexuality. The argument you agree to....and thus making you wrong here....is that behavior...by choice..to have sex with a member of the same gender, defines your orientation and sexuality. And you may argue that until the cows come home.

However, once you've engaged in becoming a parent....you've now defined yourself, there is nothing whatsoever homosexual about becomong a parent, and that is your primary reality...like it or not. One may enjoy same gender sex, may prefer to act out in a number of ways. The fact that the individual is a parent is the primary definition, sorry.

There isn't anything homosexual about procreation. Homosexuality in fact stops at behavior, it is nothing else. The lack of any homosexual behavior would NOT affect mankind in any negative way, shape, or form. Except decrease AIDS contractions especially here in the US where men having sex with men dominates our AIDS stats.

Colossal errors aren't restricted, Kal, feel free to be wrong. Most others here are.:cool:
Click to expand...

The fault is in your basic premise. There is no evidence that a human's singular purpose is to procreate, nor that the most important thing one does is procreate. These are nothing but opinions. You also have no understanding if the difference between sexual behavior and sexual orientation. Face it, Charles, you have no argument. You have an agenda, probably based on something personal.
 
texmaster said:
Very well said.

CC and others can try and pretend that if you define homosexuality into subsects long enough it will somehow lend crediance to the argument that it is a behavior that cannot be helped.
Click to expand...

You are another one who doesn't understand the argument.

I like you really enjoy the left/right hand argument since one can learn to use the left or right hand.
Click to expand...

Yet, they would STILL be left or right handed, even if they learned to use the other hand. THIS is what you refuse to see because it destroys your argument.

What it boils down to is this. People who want gay marriage, not civil unions but gay marriage have to be able to provide an argument that shows some kind of equal footing with the practice of heterosuxality going back thousands of years and by its very nature is essential to the procreation of the species. They cannot do that but it is an alternative lifestyle. That is why it continues to fail when called on for a vote. The majority of people in this country understand that. Civil unions is a very sound compromise but for the zealots, it simply isn't enough until they are on equal footing with traditional marriage but since they cannot explain or prove that the genetic nature of this lifestyle is equal to heterosexual marriage, their goal changes from proving their case to declaring victory with repeated "you don't understand" despite not explaining their conclusions with factual backing.
Click to expand...

No, what it boils down to is that those who oppose GM have no factual backing at all. All they have is their own morality, their insistence at involving themselves in the lives of others, and non-factual opinions.
 
Charles Martel said:
They've no factual backing I concur and why it's downright hillarious when I'm asked to provide the same. Even when I have.
Click to expand...

Except you never have...because you have none.
 
Charles Martel said:
That certainly ain't my best next thing, been there done that. Captain is dead on inaccurate here and hasn't supported the argument he attempts. Whatsoever. So, good luck.:lol:
Click to expand...

Actually, one thing that is NOT your best thing is understanding the argument that we are having. You have demonstrated no knowledge of the issue. Shame. You make lots of pompous statements, all vainly searching for an idea but never finding one.
 
CaptainCourtesy said:
You are another one who doesn't understand the argument.
Click to expand...

Yes yes. Your high levels of smartness. You've prosthelytized this theory often as well.

Yet, they would STILL be left or right handed, even if they learned to use the other hand. THIS is what you refuse to see because it destroys your argument.
Click to expand...

LOL Wow is your logic bad. You can learn to use both yet you use this to claim that homosexuality is a heriditary trait.

Yet you admit you can learn to use the opposite hand.

*shakes head* Its sad to see you can't understand when your argument has exposed as a fraud.

By your logic, a homosexual could learn to be bisexual but still be homosexual.

Its that kind of failed logic that dooms you each and every time.

Putting aside the fact you can't even prove the two instances are related in any way with a shred of factual data

No, what it boils down to is that those who oppose GM have no factual backing at all. All they have is their own morality, their insistence at involving themselves in the lives of others, and non-factual opinions.
Click to expand...

You're right. We only have the sexual attraction, compatible sexual organs and procreation on our side where you have a "hunch" :rofl

Give it up CC.

You have no evidence, only theories. You can't come to grips with the fact it is you who want to change the law based on a theory not factual evidence.

Oh and one more thing.

Folks who use their right hand all their life don't come out of the closet all of a sudden and become left handed. LOL
 
Last edited:
This thread may not be as homoerotic as Jallman and his avatars, but damn it's trying.
 
EpicDude86 said:
This thread may not be as homoerotic as Jallman and his avatars, but damn it's trying.
Click to expand...

I know, right? We got a Charlie, a hamster, a guy in superhero tights. All we need now is a roll of duct tape and a can of Crisco and we got ourselves a party.
 
So as I read it this is the same reason why the vote happen in Maine the Governer and Speaker of the House decide to make Gay Marriage Legal with out allowing the people to vote on the subject. Hence question 1 this past fall and we all saw what happen there.

The bottom line is this yes City Council are elected to do City Business not to make Moral Laws which this is. If they wish to allow Gay Marriage then they are going to need not only Congress to give them permission but the Citz. of Maryland and Virgina must also have a right to vote on the subject since Tax's from both of these States go to fund the District.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom