• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Human role in climate change not in doubt-UN's Ban

j-mac

DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 11, 2009
Messages
41,104
Reaction score
12,202
Location
South Carolina
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
UNITED NATIONS, Dec 8 (Reuters) - U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said on Tuesday that emails leaked from a British university have done nothing to undermine the United Nations' view that climate change is accelerating due to humans.


Reuters AlertNet - Human role in climate change not in doubt-UN's Ban


Allright, come on now....manipulated stats, destroyed data, clear agenda. Nothing has changed?

How long will we let this total hoax go?


j-mac
 
"We thought they were not going to have many cars, due to it being a climate convention," she says. "But it seems that somebody last week looked at the weather report."

Ms Jorgensen reckons that between her and her rivals the total number of limos in Copenhagen next week has already broken the 1,200 barrier. The French alone rang up on Thursday and ordered another 42. "We haven't got enough limos in the country to fulfil the demand," she says. "We're having to drive them in hundreds of miles from Germany and Sweden."

And the total number of electric cars or hybrids among that number? "Five," says Ms Jorgensen. "The government has some alternative fuel cars but the rest will be petrol or diesel. We don't have any hybrids in Denmark, unfortunately, due to the extreme taxes on those cars. It makes no sense at all, but it's very Danish."

The airport says it is expecting up to 140 extra private jets during the peak period alone, so far over its capacity that the planes will have to fly off to regional airports – or to Sweden – to park, returning to Copenhagen to pick up their VIP passengers.

Copenhagen climate summit: 1,200 limos, 140 private planes and caviar wedges - Telegraph



:rofl Typical!....What hypocrites.


j-mac
 
What manipulated stats, Mac Dog?


Manuipulated numbers to make the whole lie work. Read the e-mails.


***Note to Mods. I just noticed the Good Reverends thread, since I used a part of the same discussion without looking, could you please merge the threads. Thanks. Sorry Rev.


j-mac
 
Allright, come on now....manipulated stats, destroyed data, clear agenda. Nothing has changed?

How long will we let this total hoax go?


j-mac

Just like to correct one thing here.

A hoax is a joke. GW is no joke. It is outright fraud, not a hoax.
 
Gore cancelled his appearance at the Copenhagan summit....;)
I'd like to hear him 'splain that away....:)
 
That's a serious accusation, boo dog. Can you back it up?

I was thinking wow I wish I could quote what everyone had written so I could say right on, you got it right.

Then I came upon this quint essential example of the failure of of our education system, and a clear illustration of why some might say Liberalism is a mental illness, and frankly I was taken aback.

The emails clearly show a laundry list of frauds that have been claimed in the HOAX of Global Warming and yet not only does a mere underling cling to an indefensible position but attempts to make you defend what has already be proven beyond any doubt.

This goes back to the use of such radical guide books as those of Saul Alenskey, Karl Marx, and the newest from Robert Creamer, and in the pattern of the National Socialist Party of 1939.

Distract
Obfuscate
Make use of false flag operations
Call people names and put them on the defensive.
Accuse the other side of what you are in fact doing.
If ask if the sky is blue, reply: Yes I love vanilla ice cream and move on as if you answered the real question.
Never address a direct question with an answer remotely connected to the issue at hand, unless a miracle has happened and you can win the argument.

It's all like I always say the Liberals go all the way back to the school child mentality.

I know you are but what am I?
 
Last edited:
More and more every day we are finding out more about the myth of global warming...........
 
Last night I heard some liberal nit wit on a commentary show, talking about how three chunks the size of TX had been lost due to GW, and that Alaska's temp had risen some 6 degrees in the past 50 years. Where do these congress critter, idiots get their info from? Or better yet, they just make **** up, and think we are too stupid to see through their lies.


Right Whip?


j-mac
 
What manipulated stats, Mac Dog?


Mann's Hockey Stick and Anthropogenic Global Warming Theory in general.

If they didn't cook the books, they'd still have the ingredients, ie, the raw data.

The only reason to lose raw data is to commit fraud.
 
I'll put you down as not having any evidence whatsoever that global warming is a myth.

Since when does the onus fall upon others to disprove your claims?

Whip Comes Down is a closet homosexual!!! Prove me wrong!

:rofl
 
Why don't you post what you believe is the best evidence that Mann's Hockey Stick was manipulated?


More recent scientific work has thoroughly debunked the Mann "hockey stick" analysis. It has been shown to rest on "collation errors, unjustified truncation or extrapolation of source data, obsolete data, incorrect principal component calculations, geographical mislocations and other serious defects," as well as "incorrect mathematics." There are indications, at least, that some of the errors on the part of Mann and his collaborators were deliberate--an instance of the corruption of science by politics and perverse financial incentives that underlies the entire global warming movement.

Power Line - The Hockey Stick Hoax

There you go dog!



j-mac
 
He's a whipped dawg.
 
Why don't you post what you believe is the best evidence that Mann's Hockey Stick was manipulated?

Maybe it was manipulated, maybe it was an error in methodology, maybe it was faulty math, but before the warmers start waving their banners, they should at least have the scientific honesty to demand stringent critical analysis and proof of the methods used before they start proclaiming "truth".

The primary problem I have with the AGW camp is that its proponents use fear to sell the product. I'm amazed at how many people who condemn religion on the basis that it is fear-based will so readily buy into manmade global warming hype.


But now a shock: Canadian scientists Stephen McIntyre and Ross McKitrick have uncovered a fundamental mathematical flaw in the computer program that was used to produce the hockey stick. In his original publications of the stick, Mann purported to use a standard method known as principal component analysis, or PCA, to find the dominant features in a set of more than 70 different climate records.
But it wasnt so. McIntyre and McKitrick obtained part of the program that Mann used, and they found serious problems. Not only does the program not do conventional PCA, but it handles data normalization in a way that can only be described as mistaken.
Now comes the real shocker. This improper normalization procedure tends to emphasize any data that do have the hockey stick shape, and to suppress all data that do not. To demonstrate this effect, McIntyre and McKitrick created some meaningless test data that had, on average, no trends. This method of generating random data is called Monte Carlo analysis, after the famous casino, and it is widely used in statistical analysis to test procedures. When McIntyre and McKitrick fed these random data into the Mann procedure, out popped a hockey stick shape
!
Technology Review: Global Warming Bombshell
 
Back
Top Bottom