Page 6 of 12 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 113

Thread: Obama administration formally declares danger of carbon emissions

  1. #51
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    LIBTARDISTAN
    Last Seen
    05-01-10 @ 11:38 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    3,629

    Re: Obama administration formally declares danger of carbon emissions

    Quote Originally Posted by Whip Comes Down View Post
    Show us the proof, A Dog.
    The 'satanic e-mails' should be enough proof that the books were cooked...

  2. #52
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Last Seen
    09-22-10 @ 04:36 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    11,430

    Re: Obama administration formally declares danger of carbon emissions

    Quote Originally Posted by hazlnut View Post
    Wrong. False. Show me the emails that said that.
    Look for them yourself.

    It was shown that the only way to get Mann's "Hockey Stick" was to deliberately process the data in a manner that would produce a hockey stick for random data anyway. That's a called fraud.

    Hmmm.....Mann....Mann....where have I heard that name lately...oh, yeah, Mann is the guy that was instructing others in methods to "hide the decline".

    AGW is a fraud, you're in denial.

  3. #53
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    In the land of steers and queers
    Last Seen
    06-03-10 @ 12:07 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    1,563

    Re: Obama administration formally declares danger of carbon emissions

    Quote Originally Posted by Partisan View Post
    The 'satanic e-mails' should be enough proof that the books were cooked...
    Show us the proof, Pee Dog.

  4. #54
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    LIBTARDISTAN
    Last Seen
    05-01-10 @ 11:38 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    3,629

    Re: Obama administration formally declares danger of carbon emissions

    Quote Originally Posted by Scarecrow Akhbar View Post
    Look for them yourself.

    It was shown that the only way to get Mann's "Hockey Stick" was to deliberately process the data in a manner that would produce a hockey stick for random data anyway. That's a called fraud.

    Hmmm.....Mann....Mann....where have I heard that name lately...oh, yeah, Mann is the guy that was instructing others in methods to "hide the decline".

    AGW is a fraud, you're in denial.
    ^^^^ This pretty much sums it up.....
    Al Gore's inexplicable cancellation of his appearance at the summit sure does raise an eyebrow.....
    How can you miss an event that you've nutured when it is so close to fruition?....
    It's as bad as a partial birth abortion, IMO.....

  5. #55
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Last Seen
    09-22-10 @ 04:36 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    11,430

    Re: Obama administration formally declares danger of carbon emissions

    Quote Originally Posted by phattonez View Post
    The same reason they didn't build a decent mass transit system in Los Angeles--it would have been too efficient and cost effective.
    Ah...no. The Green Line ends, after taking an airport avoiding curve, some three miles from the airport. And that was, as stated, because goonions prevented the implementation of a rational mass transit exchange at the airport. So now the airport is serviced by goonion taxis, goonion bus drivers, and over-priced parking, and the Green Line Ends near the corner of Marine Avenue and Inglewood Boulevard in Redondo Beach. But it does have cool looking ray-gun looking things on top of the station that used to rotate.


    Quote Originally Posted by phattonez View Post
    Because we spent so much on a freeway system and decided to spread out our development. It was the fault of city planning, not some shadowy-organization.
    No, you're just wrong there. The Green Line has a high bridge over Aviation Boulevard, and they could easily have laid the route directly to the LAX terminal, even put it underground, just like Pacific Coast Highway ducks under the LAX runways.

    The "failure" of city planning was the success of goonion lobbyests. The City of Syracuse and it's Hancock Airport has suffered under similar damage by low tech, small brained special interest thug groups.

    Quote Originally Posted by phattonez View Post
    Because the Green Line was planned during the Cold War and El Segundo was a major job center because of aerospace engineering. Unfortunately, while it was being planned/built, the Soviet Union collapsed. Who knew?
    You're not trying to argue that it simply wasn't possible to intelligently design the Green Line to stop at both LAX and Space Park, are you, so they picked the one aerospace company over the MAJOR international airport hub?

    Be for real.

    Do not deny the power of the gooion force, Luke.

    Quote Originally Posted by phattonez View Post
    When people think of nuclear, they think of bombs.
    That's because they're ignorant.

    Ignorant people shouldn't be allowed to vote.

  6. #56
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    In the land of steers and queers
    Last Seen
    06-03-10 @ 12:07 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    1,563

    Re: Obama administration formally declares danger of carbon emissions

    Quote Originally Posted by Scarecrow Akhbar View Post
    the only way to get Mann's "Hockey Stick" was to deliberately process the data in a manner that would produce a hockey stick.
    What does that mean, A Dog?
    Last edited by Whip Comes Down; 12-08-09 at 07:20 PM.

  7. #57
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Last Seen
    09-22-10 @ 04:36 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    11,430

    Re: Obama administration formally declares danger of carbon emissions

    Quote Originally Posted by Partisan View Post
    ^^^^ This pretty much sums it up.....
    Al Gore's inexplicable cancellation of his appearance at the summit sure does raise an eyebrow.....
    How can you miss an event that you've nutured when it is so close to fruition?....
    It's as bad as a partial birth abortion, IMO.....
    But the Frantic Denial Phase is always interesting. Look at the Flaming Lefties running around, glaring at the sky and demanding that it fall down NOW!

    They did the same thing when Nuclear Winter was finally dismissed as a hoax, too.

  8. #58
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Last Seen
    09-22-10 @ 04:36 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    11,430

    Re: Obama administration formally declares danger of carbon emissions

    Quote Originally Posted by Whip Comes Down View Post
    What does that mean A Dog?
    What it says, of course.

  9. #59
    User
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last Seen
    01-03-10 @ 06:41 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    88

    Re: Obama administration formally declares danger of carbon emissions

    Very hard to show you the proof when all of the raw data has been deleted. So it will take another 15 to 20 years to duplicate the research to determine whether or not the conclusion of AGW is valid. Of course all of the data was 'on paper' although the publication in the late 90s and further analysis continued up through 2003 and beyond - no data was ever put on a computer for analysis. All analysis was by hand? No computers were used? Give me a break.

    The first thing a true scientist does is insure the survival of his/her raw data. It is the basis of everything that the scientist is working on. And yet every single one of the AGW crowd has claimed that the raw data has been destroyed. Of course the e-mails that were released to the public discussing such data destruction were all 'hypothetical' discussions that had nothing to do with the actual destruction of the raw data. Any scientist would look at this and toss out all conclusions that were drawn from the missing data.

    Yes, technically AGW is still a valid theory until proven wrong. But it is still a THEORY - until raw data that is made available to the public and other scientists proves it valid or not. But we now have to wait for 15 to 20 years to build up the data again . . .

  10. #60
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    LIBTARDISTAN
    Last Seen
    05-01-10 @ 11:38 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    3,629

    Re: Obama administration formally declares danger of carbon emissions

    Quote Originally Posted by Whip Comes Down View Post
    What does that mean A Dog?
    Someone needs to do their homework......

Page 6 of 12 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •